MA - draconian gun bill - human silouette targets illegal, gun registry

1,710 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by falconace
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New firearm control bill is 'real bad news for Massachusetts gun owners' says gun group

https://www.foxnews.com/media/gun-group-tells-residents-consider-moving-blue-state-lawmaker-proposes-gun-control-bill


"If Massachusetts makes House Docket 4420 law, Massachusetts will become the most anti-gun state in the country," Austin Hein, the director of political operations for the National Association for Gun Rights, told Fox News.

The 140-page omnibus bill, An Act of Modernizing Firearm Laws, makes sweeping changes to Massachusetts gun laws. This includes mandating that all firearms and feeding devices be registered, banning people under 21 from buying or carrying a semi-automatic shotgun or rifle, banning concealed carry of firearms on private property unless expressly permitted and much more.

The bill also cracks down on firearm-adjacent areas including banning targets with human silhouettes at ranges, banning people under the age of 18 from possessing mace or pepper spray and adding stun guns under the definition of firearms.

MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mostly it will be junked by SCOTUS but the citizens of that state will be unlawfully oppressed for several years until it gets to the court.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never to be outdone, Newsom will have a worse bill introduced shorty.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is stay puft marshmallow man considered human?

Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Should be a super easy case to strike it down, right?

I get that the left's goal is constant confusion - but with obvious and numerous constitutional violations, getting this struck down should be a layup.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So a 17 year old female cant buy and keep pepper spray in her purse?

You libs are truly ****ing ******ed. Braindead *******s!
Old May Banker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like it's similar to some of the **** our previous president allowed nationally.

SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only impacts law abiding citizens.

The only impact to the criminal is it's makes their job easier.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Mostly it will be junked by SCOTUS but the citizens of that state will be unlawfully oppressed for several years until it gets to the court.
It should not take that long. We need fast tracks to SCOTUS where any of the Justices can bring a new state law or federal law to the court and at least place an injunction on enforcement until it can be ruled on.
I Like Mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The descendants of the fiery revolutionaries and steadfast patriots that drove Gage out of Boston and staked their lives to ending tyranny will meekly accept this.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eso si, Que es said:

Is stay puft marshmallow man considered human?




Ok I'm printing out a dozen of those. That's awesome.

ETA range targets get boring, idk why I've never considered something like that.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will dog targets still be allowed?

deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gilligan said:

Only impacts law abiding citizens.

The only impact to the criminal is it's makes their job easier.


Violent crime especially against women will rise and no one will know why
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

The bill also cracks down on firearm-adjacent areas including banning targets with human silhouettes at ranges...
The Left has finally cracked the code on gun violence, just like they did for discrimination by tearing down statues of founding fathers.
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wouldn't you just need to draw antennae on the figure?
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
imagine the reeeing if there were targets with the democrat donkey on it.

or the republican elephant
AggieIce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If I lived there I'd ignore all of it
EMY92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The bill should be renamed the "Criminal Protection Act".

Also, the folks committing the crime, don't care what the law says, that's why they're criminals.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrats trying to create felons of ordinary law abiding citizens while letting actual felons go free without prosecution.

I have no doubt in my mind how this ends.
Rebel Yell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is just stupid.

P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The military did a study after Vietnam and found out the hit rates in enemy targets went up with human shaped targets
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
**** you, progressives.

SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
maverick2076
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.U.T.U said:

The military did a study after Vietnam and found out the hit rates in enemy targets went up with human shaped targets


It wasn't so much that hit rates were up, but that soldiers were more willing to actually engage the targets instead of either pretending to fire or purposely missing. There's a good overview of this topic and the history of soldiers not actually engaging in combat in either On Killing or On Combat (can't remember which one), both excellent books by Rex Grossman.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

**** you, progressives.

SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
falconace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I lived in MA in 2008. Most of this is already law.

Handguns have to be registered already. Human silhouettes weren't allowed when I was there.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.