Mark Wahlberg speaks out

31,779 Views | 207 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by fka ftc
10thYrSr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

beanbean said:

10thYrSr said:

beanbean said:

10thYrSr said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

Until this story is picked up by an actual reputable publication I think it's likely BS



So your truth is defined by things being published by "reputable" publications? So if a stranger is in water and says "Help I'm drowning!" your response is "Wait, let's see if it is being published by reputable publications"? Do you believe anything you aren't fed?

Some things have to be accepted as truth.
LOL, this is absolutely the same thing as not believing a link to a sketchy website. Please tell me this is a sarcastic post....I can't tell anymore.


Who defines what a "sketchy" website is? I guess if you haven't heard of it? Are you confined to a limited number of websites you consider that the fount of ALL knowledge emanates from?
LOL, there is a quote going around right now attributed to Mel Gibson that says almost exactly the same thing that this Marky Mark quote says. Mel Gibson and his people have already denied that he said that. But I'm sure this time Mark Wahlberg said this. No one is denying that there isn't some messed human trafficking and child abuse going on, but forgive us while we are wanting to wait for further conformation on this quote from Mark Wahlberg than a website that no one has heard of.

I'm not one of those "but at least it started a conversation" type guys.





That's what we call a straw man argument.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not really
10thYrSr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.
10thYrSr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Not really


Yeah really.
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geddy Lee soul patch said:

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

BudFox7 said:

Lol the internet will believe anything


And people halfway sympathetic to pedos will say this is nonsense. Disgusting.
No, we just have operating BS sensors in our brains.


Look, I thought adrenochrome was just the stuff of 70's era Hunter S Thompson stories. But how many times have you said the same and been proven wrong in the last 3-4 years? Be honest with yourself. Adrenochrome is prob BS…hard to fathom. But I'm just calling out your "BS sensors"…bet they're batting no more than 50% the past few yrs. And that is being VERY generous.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's a good actor and has been reel. I respect him and will go to see his movies
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly, the timing of this media "sweep the leg" attempt makes me wonder if the story of him sharing this may have legs….what weird coincidental timing (July 13).


beanbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.
Who is defending Hollywood elites? People are skeptical that Mark Wahlberg actually said these things. We're disgusting because we weren't born yesterday and know that there are clickbait websites all over the net that make up stories?



American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wasn't that long ago that people would have said that the idea that the FBI would be involved in conspiring in a plan to kidnap an American governor to entrap US citizens was crazy over-the-top lunacy stuff too, yet….
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not one story about this in the top hits when you search Mark Wahlberg's name.
Post removed:
by user
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.


Actual strawman
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From: MarkWahlbergsCoolCousin@aol.com
To: You

If you don't forward this article to 10 friends the Hollywood executives are going to dress you up in a diaper and make you their next victim, you have been warned.
.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yea, this is a straight up lie to the people
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like Mark Wahlberg.

He is an example of a bad kid who was able, by the power of God, to get his stuff together and become a decent man.

He has no reason to lie about this stuff.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

Quote:

Describing an industry Christmas party featuring Hollywood executives from some of the most powerful studios in the world, Wahlberg said studio bosses, executive producers, international brokers, and financial stakeholders, as well as "two A-list stars," engaged in Satanic rituals, which culminated in torture and sexual abuse of children.

According to Wahlberg, four Hollywood executives dressed in Satanic outfits and masks, who were all "drinking blood, high on adrenochrome", encouraged him to "stop being a prude and join the club" by sexually abusing "two very, very young children."




https://www.sgtreport.com/tag/mark-wahlberg-hollywood-pedophiles-have-nowhere-left-to-hide/

https://fandomwire.com/were-hunting-those-evil-sons-of-bches-down-mark-wahlberg-is-hunting-one-blood-drinking-pdophile-at-a-time-out-of-hollywood/




Wahlberg then said "Say hi to your mother for me."
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.


It's a swarm of concerned moderate and leftists locusts posting at what seems like multiple times in a thread. A conservative can barely hear himself think.
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am concerned by reports like this but skeptical until Walberg actually comes out in public and says what is being claimed he said.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fear was bad but at least at that point she was actually 19. But at 14 she was, in my opinion, hyper sexualized in her role as a coming of age girl in Man in the Moon in a manner that seemingly nodded to days of Brooke Shields as a young lady.

Someone needs to interview Corey Feldman again as he had a lot to say about few years ago about this stuff.

Add in Kevin Spacey shenanigans and many, many other accounts by child actors and it's very apparent the Hollywood elite and their ultra liberal friends enjoy them some pedophilia.

All should be round up and hung in the town square.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's the deal, you can't scream about how journalism is dying and terrible and super-left wing and all that, then go posting a super sketchy article that has no sourcing from a website that might give your computer AIDS. Can't have it both ways.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Faustus said:

10thYrSr said:

Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.


It's a swarm of concerned moderate and leftists locusts posting at what seems like multiple times in a thread. A conservative can barely hear himself think.


I have a journalistic rule. If it checks EVERY. SINGLE. BOX. Odds are it's not true, and my red flag antennae start going crazy.

To me, this is the same as Smollett's deal or Tawana Brawley or anytime someone writes something racist on a restaurant check (station actually refuses to cover anything involving the latter, because it's gotten so many other stations in trouble). It checks all the boxes and, just as bad, it has zero sourcing.
Tachoro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BudFox7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

BudFox7 said:

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

BudFox7 said:

Lol the internet will believe anything


And people halfway sympathetic to pedos will say this is nonsense. Disgusting.


Someone sent you some ridiculous links with bogus quotes and you ran to a message board with it. Haha


It's funny because you should only trust approved media sources! Haha! Am I right? High five! We are better than everyone because we only get news from select sources! Lol


Qanon4evr
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

Until this story is picked up by an actual reputable publication I think it's likely BS


So your truth is defined by things being published by "reputable" publications? So if a stranger is in water and says "Help I'm drowning!" your response is "Wait, let's see if it is being published by reputable publications"? Do you believe anything you aren't fed?

Some things have to be accepted as truth.
This is more like someone telling you they saw a person drowning, then get attacked by a shark, and everyone on the beach laughed and cheered the attack on. The problem is the reporter wasn't at the beach, hasn't talked to anybody on the beach, doesn't say which beach it happened at, and nobody on any beaches seems to have any idea what the person is talking about.

Also, a quick Google search of the author "Baxter Dmitry" (like, an almost zero percent chance that's a real name, lol), has conspiracy articles that are honestly pretty creative in their ridiculoussness.
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BassCowboy33 said:

10thYrSr said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

Until this story is picked up by an actual reputable publication I think it's likely BS


So your truth is defined by things being published by "reputable" publications? So if a stranger is in water and says "Help I'm drowning!" your response is "Wait, let's see if it is being published by reputable publications"? Do you believe anything you aren't fed?

Some things have to be accepted as truth.
This is more like someone telling you they saw a person drowning, then get attacked by a shark, and everyone on the beach laughed and cheered the attack on. The problem is the reporter wasn't at the beach, hasn't talked to anybody on the beach, doesn't say which beach it happened at, and nobody on any beaches seems to have any idea what the person is talking about.
Har-vest
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Why are so many posters jumping at the opportunity to defend Hollywood elite doing insane things? I think I understand given the premium board posters who come here, but it is disgusting. Its like they can swarm a topic with numbers and wish it to not exist based on their posts.
Your reasoning on this is as poor as your reasoning to believe the story is true.
Swan Song
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stanley Kubrick told us it happens, he made a movie about it. After a private pre-release viewing of Eyes Wide Shut, he died in his sleep of a heart attack.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swan Song said:

Stanley Kubrick told us it happens, he made a movie about it. After a private pre-release viewing of Eyes Wide Shut, he died in his sleep of a heart attack.
Question: If someone was going to kill Kubrick over a film about super-creepy sex parties, why not kill him in the years it took to make the film, which would kill or drastically slow production, rather than wait until after the film was released?
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brittmoore Car Club said:

Geddy Lee soul patch said:

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

BudFox7 said:

Lol the internet will believe anything


And people halfway sympathetic to pedos will say this is nonsense. Disgusting.
No, we just have operating BS sensors in our brains.


Look, I thought adrenochrome was just the stuff of 70's era Hunter S Thompson stories. But how many times have you said the same and been proven wrong in the last 3-4 years? Be honest with yourself. Adrenochrome is prob BS…hard to fathom. But I'm just calling out your "BS sensors"…bet they're batting no more than 50% the past few yrs. And that is being VERY generous.
Really? Im curious which ones do you think I've been wrong on?
Swan Song
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No clue, either way, if I was Mark W I'd be extra careful with my health. Good thing he moved his family out of LA.

Recently I also read about employees seeing the participants at the Bohemian Grove? That was supposedly a conspiracy theory as well.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/18/bohemian-grove-elite-club-wage-theft
Jerkin_my_durkin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure if this is true that he said all this but you are crazy if you think Hollywood, MSM, elite business figures and our government elites are not a huge part of child sex trafficking. I would say at the very least 50% of them are. Hell they convinced this country to shut down over a cold, take continuous amounts of dangerous shots for that cold and that we need to support Ukraine in a pointless conflict, probably because they wanted more eastern european children to molest.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10thYrSr said:

Rapier108 said:

It's BS.

First of all, both websites are citing thepeoplesvoice.tv as the source so you do not have two independent sources. You have two dubious sites citing an even more dubious site.

As for the thepeoplesvioce.tv, it is a fake news site. It pretty much puts out fake, over the top stories that fit every far right/qanon type conspiracy theory.

I wish people would use critical thinking just once and a while. The political left is not capable of it. The political right isn't much better anymore. This article hits every single ****ing point to fit the revived and updated Satanic moral panic. (The 80s called and want their moral panic back.) When an article is this over the top, it should automatically assumed to be fake/bull**** until proven otherwise.

And the adrenochrome thing is so stupid.

It does not do all the things people claim it does. The human body produces a very tiny amount, not enough to "harvest" for any purpose. If you want real quantities, it can be manufactured in a lab.


If Mark Wahlberg said this in a Sunday school class ( as it is reported that he did) what would be the outlet present to verify this? It was a message for christians given in a special environment. There were no news outlets there with cameras.

Yet you guys continue to want sources like this guy was talking to the world.

He said it in the confines of a religious establishment and somebody in attendance wanted to make it public.

It's never going to be verified. But we all know it is true.
It isn't true. Just because you want it to be and it fits your confirmation bias does not make it so. It is no different than knowing the voices a schizophrenic is hearing are not really there. He is absolutely sure they are there, but the voices are only in his mind. Those of us still capable of critical thinking know Wahlberg didn't say it.

You believe it is true because you want it to be true and even if Wahlberg denied it, you'd still believe it and claim he was "gotten to".

You should really learn critical thinking. It is a shame your teachers and professors didn't instill it in you.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actual Talking Thermos said:

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

Quote:

Describing an industry Christmas party featuring Hollywood executives from some of the most powerful studios in the world, Wahlberg said studio bosses, executive producers, international brokers, and financial stakeholders, as well as "two A-list stars," engaged in Satanic rituals, which culminated in torture and sexual abuse of children.

According to Wahlberg, four Hollywood executives dressed in Satanic outfits and masks, who were all "drinking blood, high on adrenochrome", encouraged him to "stop being a prude and join the club" by sexually abusing "two very, very young children."




https://www.sgtreport.com/tag/mark-wahlberg-hollywood-pedophiles-have-nowhere-left-to-hide/

https://fandomwire.com/were-hunting-those-evil-sons-of-bches-down-mark-wahlberg-is-hunting-one-blood-drinking-pdophile-at-a-time-out-of-hollywood/


I'd look for confirmation from a different source. These look like some random-ass websites.
As corrupt as our MSM are I think anything from any "random-ass website" is just as reliable or more than anything from the MSM.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.