TheEternalPessimist said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Quote:

---

but rather to develop a country's resources so that they might be able to either win the war or achieve a lasting peace.

---

We tried that for 19.5 years.

Quote:

---

If you are happy with a President who intentionally destroyed the ability of the Afghan government to fight, then use your illusions as you do in so many other respects when it comes to this traitor.

---

This is laughable, they had the ability to fight, but folded in a week. Maybe trump should have had trilateral negotiations.

---

You know what is laughable?

Having a leftist come in here and pretend that this Biden presidency has been anything but a disaster for the American people.

I have never been much for seeing power wielded against my political enemies -- but your ilk has made it to where we have no choice -- when we get power back, and we most certainly will get it back, we will have revenge on the Democrats. Wherever and whenever we can, we will use the system Democrats weaponized against us and turn that system on all of you. We will end the child grooming, the baby murder, the punitive regulations that pummel the middle class and small business owners...... and we will ensure that every corrupt bureaucracy that progressives have built up since Woodrow Wilson is either eliminated completely or significantly reigned in and held accountable to the people.

The only thing that is to be determined is will we gain that power through the ballot box or through other means? Your progressive friends better pray its through the first method.

---

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Put the bottle down. Also, do not derail this already ludacris thread into a redneck civil war 2 or TEXIT there.

Hot dam angry man.

Hunter probably be serving sentence instead of just now looking at probation.

There would be no Zelenski man crushing on Ukraine war thread. There wouldn't even be a Ukraine war thread.

No seeing that sick vile dementia riddled pedo monster buffoon on tv lying, crapping in his pants, gag ball wearing indented face, wandering looking for the 'x', just wandering around, Groping preteen little girl breasts, sniffing groping babies, falling, uncomfortable staring to nowhere with mouth open, corrupt dirt leg scum bag. PLUS no awful shame to bear for the buffoons exposed by participating in the 81MM* frickery.

3 more indictments minimum. Riots in the streets non-stop. Don't think the leftists could've survived the thought of it. Probably be the closest we've come to civil war since the Civil War.

OP,
Thanks for this thread. Increased my ignore group significantly. Win!

aggiehawg said:

---

Putin would not have invaded Ukriane.

---

Why not?

Worthless thread and OP. She asks for thoughts but has pre-determined what responses are valid.

civilaggie2011 said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

Idiotic pistol brace ban wouldn't exist which turned millions of otherwise law abiding citizens into felons overnight with zero increase in public safety. Liberals are morons.

---

So Trump, who was in favor of red flag laws and the bump stock ban, would have suddenly become a defender of the 2nd Amendment?

---

Where did I say that? Do you have some sort of evidence that Trump was planning a pistol brace ban?

ETA: Your little smirk emoji is pretty idiotic looking, when you find out I've never supported Trump's bump stock ban or any other anti 2nd amendment things Trump did. The bump stock ban also set terrible precedent that has allowed the ATF to abuse the rule making process. That being said, the bump stock ban has been overturned in at least the fifth circuit and I believe one other. The pistol brace ban has been stayed in the fifth as well, where it is likely to be struck down because its blatantly unconstitutional, not that any degenerate liberal would care. There's also no evidence Trump had any plans for a pistol brace ban, nor that his agenda was anywhere near as hostile to the 2nd amendment as the scum bag Democrats.

aggieforester05 said:

---

Idiotic pistol brace ban wouldn't exist which turned millions of otherwise law abiding citizens into felons overnight with zero increase in public safety. Liberals are morons.

---

SBRs have already a required a stamp, the ATF just stopped pretending your rifle identifies as a pistol.

Manhattan said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

Idiotic pistol brace ban wouldn't exist which turned millions of otherwise law abiding citizens into felons overnight with zero increase in public safety. Liberals are morons.

---

SBRs have already a required a stamp, the ATF just stopped pretending your rifle identifies as a pistol.

---

Tell me what the point of this rule is and how it improves safety? Why does the SBR rule exist in the NFA specifically and how is that relevant today? I'm sure you'll do some research before you answer, but I suspect you're completely ignorant about the things you want banned like every gun control advocate.

Canyon99 said:

---

Worthless thread and OP. She asks for thoughts but has pre-determined what responses are valid.

---

But yet for OP...

> What would be different had Trump won in 2020?


America would still exist

Manhattan said:

---

And Baradar and 5000 Taliban had nothing to do with that? Trump got destroyed negotiating with the Taliban. Biden got us out.

---

with 13 American soldiers needlessly lost and many left behind, along with interpreters (no wonder they don't trust us.)

billions of dollars of equipment left behind and he gave up Bagram Airport with brand new procedures and RADAR facilities as well as ground based ILS etc.

We should have remained in Bagram with advisory capabilities.

Top answers:
Energy independence - We already produce as much as we consume. Do people want to stop free trade?
No war - We are not in one, at least, not a hot one.
Great economy - There's a reasonable argument to be had about federal spending driving up inflation.
Global peace - A pipe dream of the 'don't provoke Russia and China' crowd, which, oddly, sounds like the extreme left.
Closed border - A truly closed border, beside being an insanely stupid concept that would have severe detrimental affects on our 'great economy,' can't happen without legislation, that will likely never pass.

AndesAg92 said:

---

I don't disagree with all your rebuttals to Hawg. Im not much of a Trump guy. Ready for Ronny D.

But your O&G comment showed your asz. Typical smug ***** that wants to seem intelligent. Get bent.

---

Kind of a jerk response, not sure why my statement seemed smug, or why I should be called a *****. Seems like you have comprehension and/or rage problems.

You're welcome to disagree with me, but I'm far from uninformed on the topic. I work for big oil in economics.

e=mc2 said:

---

Energy independence and no war resulting in a great economy and peace.

Also a closed border which means less sex and drug trafficking and fewer fentanyl deaths.

---

And world peace, and no famine and....Its astonishing people really believe Trump alone could have done this. (however if this was supposed a winky emoji...my apologies).

civilaggie2011 said:

---

AndesAg92 said:

---

I don't disagree with all your rebuttals to Hawg. Im not much of a Trump guy. Ready for Ronny D.

But your O&G comment showed your asz. Typical smug ***** that wants to seem intelligent. Get bent.

---

Kind of a jerk response, not sure why my statement seemed smug, or why I should be called a *****. Seems like you have comprehension and/or rage problems.

You're welcome to disagree with me, but I'm far from uninformed on the topic. I work for big oil in economics.

---

I cannot figure Andes out. He is super sensitive about the weirdest things and loves to talk sh** to others online. Think's he the board dictator.

The daily press conference would be entertaining and probably some hot straight chick would be crushing media attacks with facts.