BudFox7 said:
LOYAL AG said:
BudFox7 said:
LOYAL AG said:
BudFox7 said:
Tips are gifts. You're paying the employment costs of a company to some person you likely don't know and will probably never see again.
Do people tip you for doing your job? If you do an exceptional job quarterly or yearly, your employer may tip you with a bonus.
I'm paying zero of another companies employment costs. Zero.
Tell us you're bad at math without saying you're bad at math. True wait staff get paid $2.13/hr plus tips which in a typical restaurant in CS will get them to about $15/hr, maybe $20. Labor costs are about 20% in a restaurant with wait staff being a small piece of that, maybe 25% of labor or 5% of sales. If you eliminate tips then the restaurant will have to pay $20/hr for the exact same help and the price you pay will go up commensurate with the additional cost to the employer.
I couldn't care less how you compensate your employees. It's not my obligation to do so, it's yours. Nor do I care how you price your products in an environment where you weren't able to lobby the govt for lower than standard compensation rates.
Either way you won't fool or guilt me into compensating your employees for you.
You don't or won't get it. In a world where tipping isn't the norm all restaurants go up in price. It really is simple math. At least in this world you have control over what your final total is. Take away tipping and the resulting price increase means you lose that control.
So be as sour as you'd like. And as cheap as you'd like. Today you can do that. But please understand basic math along the way.
Lol. The only reason you're for tipping is either (a) you have ownership in a restaurant (b) work in a restaurant or (c) so cowardly that you crumble in front of the tip screen from the social guilt of not gifting money to a stranger for carrying a plate to your table
Dear God. You can't be serious. Do you really not understand math? You're awfully smug for someone who, with each new post, looks really poorly educated on basic economics.
Pop quiz. In a world without tips which of the following do you think happens?
A - Waitstaff continue to work for $2.13/hr without tips.
B - Without tips waitstaff wages go up to $15/hr and the owner eats the difference.
C - Without tips waitstaff wages go up to $15/hr and the owner passes on the cost increase to the consumer.
D - waitstaff go away entirely.
Here's some hints. A is illegal so we can toss that one aside and D isn't gonna happen because most people enjoy the restaurant experience with waitstaff or it wouldn't exist. So which is it? Do prices go up or not when the owner's labor cost goes from $2.13/hr to $15/hr? I'm arguing C is the most likely outcome which means the cost of dining out doesn't change regardless of whether you tip or not.
If you want to argue the tipping system doesn't work to incentivize good service or that tipping is out of control I'm all for that discussion and agree with the latter. You're arguing that your tips are subsidizing the owners profits and that is just factually incorrect.
I don't own restaurants but I do own a business that supports several of them so I'm intimately familiar with the economics of restaurants. And I'm an educated person that understands basic math and supply and demand. And labor law in this space. So please share your background and how you reached your conclusions.
The federal government was never meant to be this powerful.