LMCane said:

---

YouBet said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

All the republicans had to do was nominate a intelligible speaking individual without a bunch of baggage.

---

This shouldn't even had mattered though. How have we gotten to the point that Democrats are so party first that they will vote for a mentally compromised stroke victim, who was already a known moron, over almost anyone else?

That is how worthless Democrats are. Everyone who voted for him should have to forfeit their vote in next election as recompense. They clearly aren't competent to vote.

---

as a conservative of course I agree that leftists are brain dead and put their party loyalty first.

but take this sentence you wrote:

"How have we gotten to the point that Democrats are so party first that they will vote for a mentally compromised stroke victim, who was already a known moron, over almost anyone else?"

now from a left wing perspective look at the same sentence:

"How have we gotten to the point that Republicans are so party first that they will vote for someone impeached twice and indicted three times, who was already a known loser in three elections, over almost anyone else?"

it goes both ways. In other words- the politics in this country are @#$@#$ up

---

Can you show us on the doll where Trump touched you?

Jocko did a very good interview with David McCormick, the guy who was Dr. Oz opponent for the Republican nomination. He made the understatement of the year: "The people of Pennsylvania are not well represented."

Sounds like a very good dude who would have been a much better choice for the people of Pennsylvania and the USA.

Link to interview:

I liked Kathy Barnette better than McCormick or Oz, but it doesn't matter. All three are 100x better than a brain-damaged empty suit for one of only 100 of the highest level lawmakers in the land. Pennsylvania is gone, probably forever, and using "Oz just wasn't a good candidate" as an excuse is a B.S. liberal talking point excuse. No R was going to win there. The democratic election machine in the cities has been "connected" and running for decades, but 2020 and 2022 have turned absentee voting into a mass-mailed one-party socialist election rig for eternity. What's sad is it was an R-controlled state house in 2020 that was duped by the scamdemic to make it happen and now they'll never get it back.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

Gee…who knew electing Herman Munster with an 8 year old's intellect was a bad idea?

---

Herman Munster would've been a much better senator.

He's now the one who knocks?

LOL

He rode the ballot harvesting operation just like biden.

He's up for re-election in the 2028 presidential election he is going to cruise to victory.

It doesn't matter who you are, what you say, or don't have the faculties to say. As long as you have the "D" by your name you are golden.

Keep in mind Pennsylvania voters had already been "team Democrat" stupid enough to make him the Lt Governor, if memory serves.

Roll the Bones said:

---

That can't be him. He's wearing a collared shirt.

---

A dirty collared shirt. What's the stuff on his collar? That's nasty

He and poopy pants are the biggest examples of all time the dems simply don't care who the candidate is. They're about winning and power and they win. Meanwhile the majority of conservatives are going to vote for a candidate who has zero chances of winning the general election.
This is why we keep losing to them.

Grapesoda2525 said:

---

AggieStan said:

---

And the republicans lost to him

---

GOP lost because they chose a carpet bagging snake oil salesman as their candidate.

---

If Oz would've been the democrat nominee would he have won and Fetterman was the republican?

oh no said:

---

I liked Kathy Barnette better than McCormick or Oz, but it doesn't matter. All three are 100x better than a brain-damaged empty suit for one of only 100 of the highest level lawmakers in the land. Pennsylvania is gone, probably forever, and using "Oz just wasn't a good candidate" as an excuse is a B.S. liberal talking point excuse. No R was going to win there. The democratic election machine in the cities has been "connected" and running for decades, but 2020 and 2022 have turned absentee voting into a mass-mailed one-party socialist election rig for eternity. What's sad is it was an R-controlled state house in 2020 that was duped by the scamdemic to make it happen and now they'll never get it back.

---

Except they circumvented the state constitution and unilaterally changed mail in balloting. I don't understand how it was allowed to stand, except if you think nefariously then you understand.

ts5641 said:

---

He and poopy pants are the biggest examples of all time the dems simply don't care who the candidate is. They're about winning and power and they win. Meanwhile the majority of conservatives are going to vote for a candidate who has zero chances of winning the general election.
This is why we keep losing to them.

---

With this line of thinking then it doesn't matter who we put out there, be it Trump DeSantis, Nikki, Haley, Tim Scott we're gonna lose either way

Fetterman is proof ballot harvesting works.

TAMU1990 said:

---

Except they circumvented the state US constitution and unilaterally changed mail in balloting. I don't understand how it was allowed to stand, except if you think nefariously then you understand.

---

FIFY

Our Consitution states that legislatures shall determine election laws. The judiciary in Pennsylvania unilaterally re-wrote election laws for the 2020 election. It was nakedly unconstitutional. The court system failed America.

C@LAg said:

---

he is an incompetent, incoherent, likely incontinent POS, but at least he is a real Pensylvanian.

---

Fetterman illustrates perfectly how dumb it is to use this as the top method to choose a candidate

He's the only political candidate besides AOC and Sheila Jackson Lee that make Biden look like a genius!

Bryanisbest said:

---

Penn not happy with Fetterman, the man they elected.
SF not happy with Chessa Boudin, the man they elected.
Chicago not happy with the mayor they elected.
New York not happy with the mayor they elected.
Houston not happy with their county judge.
Oakland not happy with their DA.
And on and on.

They only have themselves to blame. When will they learn.

---

Unless all the those elections were rigged and they never wanted those installed into office to begin with.

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Makes me think of Shrek.

What an ogre.

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

---

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Makes me think of Shrek.

What an ogre.

---

Look at those chicken legs!

annie88 said:

---

Who could've ever seen this coming?

You vote for a brain damaged dip**** you get a brain damage dip *****

Democratic Sen. John Fetterman, who has consistently struggled through public events due to the aftermath of a stroke he suffered more than a year ago, is falling to President Biden's unpopularity level in his own home state of Pennsylvania.

Fetterman has floundered through Senate hearings and other public events since taking office, often coming across incoherent due to his injuries from the stroke. His office has repeatedly slammed critics for drawing attention to the issue and maintains he is fine outside of auditory processing problems.

According to a Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday, half of Keystone State voters disapprove of Fetterman's job handling, while only 39% approve. President Biden has a worse approval rating in the state, with 57% of Pennsylvanians disapproving of his job handling as president, while 39% approve.

Voters view Fetterman much worse than his fellow statewide Democrats, the poll shows.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fetterman-approaches-biden-level-unpopularity-home-state-pennsylvania-poll

---

Technically, the citizens of Pennsylvania didn't vote Fetterman into office.

Bryanisbest said:

---

Penn not happy with Fetterman, the man they elected.
SF not happy with Chessa Boudin, the man they elected.
Chicago not happy with the mayor they elected.
New York not happy with the mayor they elected.
Houston not happy with their county judge.
Oakland not happy with their DA.
And on and on.

They only have themselves to blame. When will they learn.

---

It almost sounds like politicians no longer have to be liked to "win" elections. Weird.

aggiepanic95 said:

---

Bryanisbest said:

---

Penn not happy with Fetterman, the man they elected.
SF not happy with Chessa Boudin, the man they elected.
Chicago not happy with the mayor they elected.
New York not happy with the mayor they elected.
Houston not happy with their county judge.
Oakland not happy with their DA.
And on and on.

They only have themselves to blame. When will they learn.

---

Unless all the those elections were rigged and they never wanted those installed into office to begin with.

---

Touche'

lb sand said:

---

Jocko did a very good interview with David McCormick, the guy who was Dr. Oz opponent for the Republican nomination. He made the understatement of the year: "The people of Pennsylvania are not well represented."

Sounds like a very good dude who would have been a much better choice for the people of Pennsylvania and the USA.

Link to interview:

---

Question lb sand, if you follow Jocko more recently. Is he still a pretty neutral podcaster who doesn't engage in political topics or is he more right political in topics vs say 3 years ago?

I'm just curious as I have liked his content and wondered if there has been an evolution.

In my opinion, Jocko has done his best to not outright state a preference for one party, ideology etc. However, it appears to me that the guests that he has that are running for office are at least republicans. I know he's had Crenshaw, McCormack, Derrick Van Orden(R. Wisconsin). Maybe those guys aren't as conservative as others wished they were, but they are running as R. I know he's had others on as well. Not sure if it was the Jocko podcast, maybe on Rogan, where he had a conversation with Tulsi Gabbard.

He has made comments regarding the Afghan withdrawal and what an utter failure due to lack of leadership that was. As someone that has listened to every Jocko podcast, I would surmise he is conservative but does his best to keep out of all the political mud that labels bring.

Has America jumped the shark?

Freshman Pennsylvania U.S. Senator John Fetterman is among the least popular members of the U.S. Senate, according to a Morning Consult poll.

The poll showed Fetterman with 43% of Pennsylvanians disapproving of his job performance less than a year after voting him into the Senate. Fetterman's approval rating of 44% was also among the lowest of the seven freshman Senators.
Only Senators Mitch McConnell (R-Ky), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had higher disapproval ratings from voters in their respective states.
Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) also had 43% disapproval from their constituents.
Fetterman's approval rating among Pennsylvania Democrats (75%) was among the highest among the class of freshmen Senators with 13% of Democrats disapproving of Fetterman. Republicans

So of course, when looking at political biases, you would expect numbers like that. Republicans don't like him, Democrats still do. That would be the case for almost any representative.

Opalka said:

---

Freshman Pennsylvania U.S. Senator John Fetterman is among the least popular members of the U.S. Senate, according to a Morning Consult poll.

The poll showed Fetterman with 43% of Pennsylvanians disapproving of his job performance less than a year after voting him into the Senate. Fetterman's approval rating of 44% was also among the lowest of the seven freshman Senators.
Only Senators Mitch McConnell (R-Ky), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had higher disapproval ratings from voters in their respective states.
Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) also had 43% disapproval from their constituents.
Fetterman's approval rating among Pennsylvania Democrats (75%) was among the highest among the class of freshmen Senators with 13% of Democrats disapproving of Fetterman. Republicans

So of course, when looking at political biases, you would expect numbers like that. Republicans don't like him, Democrats still do. That would be the case for almost any representative.

---

75% being happy with that brain-dead potato tells you more about democrat voters than anything

AgBandsman said:

---

Bryanisbest said:

---

Penn not happy with Fetterman, the man they elected.
SF not happy with Chessa Boudin, the man they elected.
Chicago not happy with the mayor they elected.
New York not happy with the mayor they elected.
Houston not happy with their county judge.
Oakland not happy with their DA.
And on and on.

They only have themselves to blame. When will they learn.

---

It almost sounds like politicians no longer have to be liked to "win" elections. Weird.

---

The Democrats want to do to the entire country what they've done in the major cities...overwhelming Democrat-bot voting population who choose the same Democrat candidates every single time regardless of the awful results and nothing ever changes except the The Party insiders get to live like kings.

jt2hunt said:

---

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

---

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Makes me think of Shrek.

What an ogre.

---

Look at those chicken legs!

---

Look at the lump on the neck! Sheesh!