IRS Whistleblower Calls Garland's Bluff, Starts Naming Names

3,616 Views | 25 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by TexAgs91
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

As RedState reported, AG Merrick Garland answered questions on Friday related to the sweetheart deal that was recently given to Hunter Biden. Despite five years of investigation and numerous other possible chargeable crimes, including drugs, sex trafficking, false statements, and tax fraud, the president's son escaped with two misdemeanors, pre-trial diversion, and no jail time.

How did things get to that point? An IRS whistleblower named Gary Shapley has been at the center of exposing the DOJ's cover-up of the matter, and Garland's response was to call him a liar without actually saying it directly.

When further pressed on whether DOJ leadership stepped in at any point to stop Weiss from charging Hunter Biden with more serious crimes in other jurisdictions, Garland had this to say.
Quote:

GARLAND: I'm saying he was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own.
It's incredibly telling that when given the chance to just say "no," Garland chose to hedge instead. After all, the question isn't just whether Weiss had the authority to make decisions or not, but whether other DOJ officials, including possibly Garland, interfered in those decisions in some way.

That's the charge that Shapley made in his testimony, which was given under oath before Congress. So who's telling the truth? In response, Shapley put out a statement via his lawyers that can only be described as calling Garland's bluff.
Quote:

In an October 7, 2022, meeting at the Delaware U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. Attorney David Weiss told six witnesses he did not have authority to charge in other districts and had thus requested special counsel status.
Astonishingly, Shapley is now actually naming the six witnesses present at the meeting in question, including members of the FBI and IRS investigative teams that were working the Hunter Biden case. That certainly adds to his credibility. If he weren't telling the truth, there's very little reason to believe Shapley would be naming names and essentially challenging others to go under oath about what was said.


https://redstate.com/bonchie/2023/06/24/irs-whistleblower-calls-merrick-garlands-bluff-starts-naming-names-n766719


Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is really escalated quickly!

Need to get this guy in front of a congressional committee. There is no excuse to delay this.

I'm Gipper
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Me thinks the Arkansas suicide machine is gearing up for some action.
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oops he shot himself in the back of the head 2x then hung himself from a 20 foot tree
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No wonder they are ginning up the fake Nazi protest actors to create distraction headlines
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

No wonder they are ginning up the fake Nazi protest actors to create distraction headlines

Maybe this is why potatus retained counsel today.
oldarmyjess66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brandon in need of a good lawyer!
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Call me cynical, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is some kind of orchestrated political shenanigans. Maybe I'm wrong, but the dems really need to get rid of Biden. I see two options:

1. If Biden runs again, it's obvious to anyone with two brain cells that he's not running the country. And there's some sort of deep state operating in the shadows.
2. Get rid of him and they can try to regain some credibility.

I mean, the left has to notice this right? He's senile. He's a creep. He's said some remarkable things in the past about race and homosexuality. And by far worst of all; he's an old, white, male. Based on the criteria they keep saying matters so much, he's just about the worst possible candidate.

Of course, as another poster said, most dems would vote dem on a ballot that simply said: "democrat candidate X."
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All of that was obvious before the last election but it didn't matter. Dem voters just want to be governed harder...couldn't give two ****s if it's the president or someone behind the scenes calling the shots.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fenrir said:

All of that was obvious before the last election but it didn't matter. Dem voters just want to be governed harder...couldn't give two ****s if it's the president or someone behind the scenes calling the shots.

I get that, but shouldn't it be even more obvious now? I don't understand how one single person could vote for him let alone *81 million. It's like the deep state is just effing with us now. Like they're all laughing over drinks saying among themselves "Let's see how ridiculous of a candidate we can cram down their throats…it'll be hilarious!"

He reminds me of Lloyd Bridges from the Hot Shots movies. THAT is how ridiculous he is as "president." Only problem is, this **** ain't funny.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

This is really escalated quickly!

Need to get this guy in front of a congressional committee. There is no excuse to delay this.



Wrestling fans
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Merrick Garland is a bent cop.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.
Barr wasn't much better.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Helicopter Ben said:

Fenrir said:

All of that was obvious before the last election but it didn't matter. Dem voters just want to be governed harder...couldn't give two ****s if it's the president or someone behind the scenes calling the shots.

I get that, but shouldn't it be even more obvious now? I don't understand how one single person could vote for him let alone *81 million. It's like the deep state is just effing with us now. Like they're all laughing over drinks saying among themselves "Let's see how ridiculous of a candidate we can cram down their throats…it'll be hilarious!"

He reminds me of Lloyd Bridges from the Hot Shots movies. THAT is how ridiculous he is as "president." Only problem is, this **** ain't funny.


The left doesn't vote for a candidate now. The party picks the candidate and they vote for the candidate the party picks. It was rigged for Hillary in 2016. In 2020, it was rigged for Joe. If you recall, everyone dropped out before Super Tuesday to give it to Biden.

Yes, they go through the motions, but their entire primary season is a charade now.

Throw in ballot harvesting and changing voter laws via the state executive branches, and presto, 81 million for a lying vegetable.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.
Barr wasn't much better.

Apparently not.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.


Imagine him on the Supreme Court.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.


Imagine him on the Supreme Court.


He'd be no different than the other libs. Vote by feeling without regard for the constitution.

Honestly, it doesn't matter who the left installs as AG. The office is lawless now when the Dems are in power.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool how the "nazis" and their pursuit of one pure race, let a black guy do their dirty work.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"bent cop" Toooo tame.
More like "Cop for sale. High Hard mileage. Leaks, Limps, Lies as necessary"
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.
EVERYONE is DC is bent. They are all a bunch of crooks.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

Squadron7 said:

Merrick Garland is a bent cop.
EVERYONE is DC is bent. They are all a bunch of crooks.
I am not sure how to fix that.
Not Coach Jimbo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So investigate the investigation and see if that's prolongs things enough for people to lose interest.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This all sounds encouraging, BUT

it all depends on Republicans having a spine. Remember the one thing you can count on with Republicans and that is that they can't be counted on.

They will never do anything of consequence against a Democrat.
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.