Working the TV and opening phone and taking pics is insanely advanced for 12 months. I'd worry more about your child being Jason Bourne.ballchain said:
I am going to make a wild guess and say, at least from my own observations, that a potential cause of autism is visual/audial over stimulation in modern humans.
Too much exposure to TV, iPhones/Pads, Video Gaming, Social Media, etc. I can only imagine how boring it must be when you're inundated with all of these stimuli and then have them taken away.
I grew up in the Atari 2600 then NES world and we got maybe a few hours a week to play that *****
Kids these days are on some sort of display screen for more than half of their waking hours. Hell, my ****ing baby was working the remote to the TV, opening the camera on my phone to take pics, and scrolling/swiping whatever **** was on the screen at 12 months. At 15 months, she can turn the TV on and switch to Netflix looking for Cocomelon. What the **** kinda kid does that? DISCLAIMER: I have since limited all exposure for fear the kid will grow up bored and need to be pilled-out to exist on this plane.
Combine that with so many adults taking pills, diet, lack of exposure to God's natural creation, and here we are - in a drug-based trance so we can keep the machine running for the greater good.
They were either 1. bought out by these big pharmas/ corpsQuote:
What happened to old school democrats that were skeptical of big business?
That is not true. He has stated this multiple times. He wants real research done on both autism & vaccines.Rapier108 said:I am always skeptical of all sides of an issue. Just how I've always been, probably more so since college because of the amount of research papers I had to do which involved more hours in the library than I can count. Looking at both sides of an issue taught me to learn as much as possible on a subject matter, even if one side I vehemently disagree with, because at least then I understand where they are coming from.BG Knocc Out said:I think the hardcore blind believing pro-vaxxers who don't think they could possibly cause ANY harm to ANYONE think some of us skeptics are arguing that these vaccines cause certain, impending harm to everyone who takes them. Not saying that at all, just that there is a TON of evidence/smoke that they are causing harm to a small % of children.Rapier108 said:If she had a seizure, that could have caused brain damage.The Green Dragon said:Rapier108 said:You know the only so called "study" which claimed that was withdrawn and the author admitted he faked the entire thing.Yukon Cornelius said:
Vaccines 100% are playing a factor.
The only evidence I have is anecdotal. Family friends' daughter, like all their other kids, was extremely outgoing, talented and intelligent. She received her vaccines around 9. She had a seizure reaction and was never the same: voice changed, socialization changed - basically a completely different person over night. I saw it and that's that.
I'm not referring to rare, adverse reactions to a vaccine, which do happen. Just look at the warnings on the flu shot form one has to read and fill out. The risk of low, but never zero; same for any medication. I do not believe vaccines cause autism by themselves. I do think they should be more spread out when given to kids. Perhaps too many at once can cause an adverse immune reaction in some people.
Now the WuFlu shots, that's a completely different topic. I'm only referring to the vaccines we've been using for 30, 40, 50+ years now.
Now, if someone wants their kids to die of some preventable disease, knock yourself out. Not my kids or my decision.
It could be pure coincidence that these cases skyrocketed in the late 80's/early 90's with the rollout of the extensive and largely unnecessary vaccine schedule for babies/toddlers. But I think only a fool would say there absolutely ibn no way can be any real causation with 100% certainty. And the last three years should have been a HUGE screaming wake up call that these politicians and big pharma are not to be blindly trusted.
I don't trust big pharma, nor do I trust RFK Jr. Both have their own agenda. Big pharma wants to make the $$$, RFK Jr. wants to ban all vaccines which would bring back things like polio, tetanus, diphtheria, etc. Like with most things, the truth most likely lies somewhere between the two.
It started with zero tolerance policies in the early 1990s. A kid is powerless to fight back against bullies even if the teachers know they're putting a kid through hell and deserve it, or even defend themselves because with zero tolerance they're also the guilty one.TxSquarebody said:
When was the push to " end bullying"? Could be a correlation.