I am going to need to see the hooters in question before I make any kind of judgement. Because if they were great, at 15, I would be just as pumped as I am today about seeing nice sweater puppies.

Gradaggie05 said:

---

I didn't read past the OP.

So a dude took off his shirt in front of kids?

I can't keep up with this $h!t anymore

---

No, an ugly, most likely fat and hairy, woman who feels like a dude.

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

They are still happening, every single day. Why don't you do something about it? (To pose question I'm asked all the time as if my life's work is supposed to be sex crimes - that's for the police)

---

You and many many others could stop defending, goaltending and downplaying it for starters. I think any priest or pastor who even verbally flirts or acts inappropriately provocative with little children deserves to be skinned alive. If they twerked or dressed like scantily clad hookers, death for sure.

You don't seem to care much at all when your tribe does it though. You constantly downplay and deflect and point fingers elsewhere.

We hold our own to much higher standards of decency and acceptable behavior. Always have, throughout all of human history. Your tribe has always been the ones to be overtly sexual and openly provocative and -in-your-face. Reckless sex, drugs, sex with teenagers, perverted and twisted shows involving small children etc etc etc. I won't ever take any moral lecturing from the LGBTQ brigade. Deaf ears.

---

Clergy are doing far worse, don't kid yourself.

And I'm well aware you think you have moral high road. That's the scariest thing about some of you, you think your religion justifies your hate and other actions you allude to since you've discovered you can't post your violent plans for lgbt people at large. You say creative things like "They'll be dealt with in due time" or "God will sort them out"…

---

What a psycho thing to say. Delusional. Incredible.

And I know some gay clergy are doing far worse than what I described above. I am just saying that I would be fine with torture and execution if they engaged in even softer core behavior than we see the drag queens acting out on a regular basis in front of children. Point being, I hold them to much higher standards of morality and behavior. Just as God/Jesus did.

I would be fine with life in prison for any drag queen performing provocatively in front of children. But if supposed "men of God" dressed like hookers and gyrated for children? The most painful torture followed by death.

---

Lets assume I agree with your premise that same sex victims are some sort of homosexual act (I don't, plus these coverups involve lots of people including straight ones). Your post proves perfectly how myopic you are about these crimes and that they are ALWAYS the gays as if there were NO female victims in Catholic Church coverups (or recent baptist church report or numerous LDS cases etc etc etc).

You let your point of view blind you to real dangers in this world because your politicians told you LGBT people are dangerous and that's way easier than believing Father/Pastor Bob are a potential threat.

---

Holy crap, lots to unpack here. So it's not necessarily a homosexual act for a grown man to have sex with boys? Please tell me I just need my second cup of coffee for the day and am misreading here. That's more of a stretch than people who say that bisexual men who have sex with men aren't at all gay.

And no, I don't think it's ONLY man on boy...they just make up the vast vast majority of cases...that is undeniable. To be fair, one of the reasons (imo), is that every single church I have ever known of does a pretty damn good job of making sure girls are never left alone with men for periods at a time. The Catholic church in particular, has a history of men and boys spending lots and lots of time together.

---

LGBTQers attempt to protect their brand by claiming a man molesting a boy isn't "gay", he's a pedophile - as if the two identities were mutually exclusive. They know that a disproportionate number of child molestations are man on boy. That implicates homosexuals. They make that disappear by saying, "that man wasn't gay, he just likes kids. Specifically boys ... but hey, that's irrelevant".

This kind of thing happens every day with straight folks too. But it doesn't make the headlines.

safelightKL said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

They are still happening, every single day. Why don't you do something about it? (To pose question I'm asked all the time as if my life's work is supposed to be sex crimes - that's for the police)

---

You and many many others could stop defending, goaltending and downplaying it for starters. I think any priest or pastor who even verbally flirts or acts inappropriately provocative with little children deserves to be skinned alive. If they twerked or dressed like scantily clad hookers, death for sure.

You don't seem to care much at all when your tribe does it though. You constantly downplay and deflect and point fingers elsewhere.

We hold our own to much higher standards of decency and acceptable behavior. Always have, throughout all of human history. Your tribe has always been the ones to be overtly sexual and openly provocative and -in-your-face. Reckless sex, drugs, sex with teenagers, perverted and twisted shows involving small children etc etc etc. I won't ever take any moral lecturing from the LGBTQ brigade. Deaf ears.

---

Clergy are doing far worse, don't kid yourself.

And I'm well aware you think you have moral high road. That's the scariest thing about some of you, you think your religion justifies your hate and other actions you allude to since you've discovered you can't post your violent plans for lgbt people at large. You say creative things like "They'll be dealt with in due time" or "God will sort them out"…

---

What a psycho thing to say. Delusional. Incredible.

And I know some gay clergy are doing far worse than what I described above. I am just saying that I would be fine with torture and execution if they engaged in even softer core behavior than we see the drag queens acting out on a regular basis in front of children. Point being, I hold them to much higher standards of morality and behavior. Just as God/Jesus did.

I would be fine with life in prison for any drag queen performing provocatively in front of children. But if supposed "men of God" dressed like hookers and gyrated for children? The most painful torture followed by death.

---

Lets assume I agree with your premise that same sex victims are some sort of homosexual act (I don't, plus these coverups involve lots of people including straight ones). Your post proves perfectly how myopic you are about these crimes and that they are ALWAYS the gays as if there were NO female victims in Catholic Church coverups (or recent baptist church report or numerous LDS cases etc etc etc).

You let your point of view blind you to real dangers in this world because your politicians told you LGBT people are dangerous and that's way easier than believing Father/Pastor Bob are a potential threat.

---

Holy crap, lots to unpack here. So it's not necessarily a homosexual act for a grown man to have sex with boys? Please tell me I just need my second cup of coffee for the day and am misreading here. That's more of a stretch than people who say that bisexual men who have sex with men aren't at all gay.

And no, I don't think it's ONLY man on boy...they just make up the vast vast majority of cases...that is undeniable. To be fair, one of the reasons (imo), is that every single church I have ever known of does a pretty damn good job of making sure girls are never left alone with men for periods at a time. The Catholic church in particular, has a history of men and boys spending lots and lots of time together.

---

LGBTQers attempt to protect their brand by claiming a man molesting a boy isn't "gay", he's a pedophile. As if, they two were mutually exclusive. They know that a disproportionate number of child molestations are man on boy. That implicates homosexuals. They make that disappear by saying, "that man wasn't gay, he just likes kids. Specifically boys ... but hey, that's irrelevant".

---

It's utter insanity. No way they really believe this deep down.

Opalka said:

---

This kind of thing happens every day with straight folks too. But it doesn't make the headlines.

---

Straight lifeguards walk around in the nude in front of children flashing teets and genitalia??? I'm callin BS on that one.

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

They are still happening, every single day. Why don't you do something about it? (To pose question I'm asked all the time as if my life's work is supposed to be sex crimes - that's for the police)

---

You and many many others could stop defending, goaltending and downplaying it for starters. I think any priest or pastor who even verbally flirts or acts inappropriately provocative with little children deserves to be skinned alive. If they twerked or dressed like scantily clad hookers, death for sure.

You don't seem to care much at all when your tribe does it though. You constantly downplay and deflect and point fingers elsewhere.

We hold our own to much higher standards of decency and acceptable behavior. Always have, throughout all of human history. Your tribe has always been the ones to be overtly sexual and openly provocative and -in-your-face. Reckless sex, drugs, sex with teenagers, perverted and twisted shows involving small children etc etc etc. I won't ever take any moral lecturing from the LGBTQ brigade. Deaf ears.

---

Clergy are doing far worse, don't kid yourself.

And I'm well aware you think you have moral high road. That's the scariest thing about some of you, you think your religion justifies your hate and other actions you allude to since you've discovered you can't post your violent plans for lgbt people at large. You say creative things like "They'll be dealt with in due time" or "God will sort them out"…

---

What a psycho thing to say. Delusional. Incredible.

And I know some gay clergy are doing far worse than what I described above. I am just saying that I would be fine with torture and execution if they engaged in even softer core behavior than we see the drag queens acting out on a regular basis in front of children. Point being, I hold them to much higher standards of morality and behavior. Just as God/Jesus did.

I would be fine with life in prison for any drag queen performing provocatively in front of children. But if supposed "men of God" dressed like hookers and gyrated for children? The most painful torture followed by death.

---

Lets assume I agree with your premise that same sex victims are some sort of homosexual act (I don't, plus these coverups involve lots of people including straight ones). Your post proves perfectly how myopic you are about these crimes and that they are ALWAYS the gays as if there were NO female victims in Catholic Church coverups (or recent baptist church report or numerous LDS cases etc etc etc).

You let your point of view blind you to real dangers in this world because your politicians told you LGBT people are dangerous and that's way easier than believing Father/Pastor Bob are a potential threat.

---

Holy crap, lots to unpack here. So it's not necessarily a homosexual act for a grown man to have sex with boys? Please tell me I just need my second cup of coffee for the day and am misreading here. That's more of a stretch than people who say that bisexual men who have sex with men aren't at all gay.

And no, I don't think it's ONLY man on boy...they just make up the vast vast majority of cases...that is undeniable. To be fair, one of the reasons (imo), is that every single church I have ever known of does a pretty damn good job of making sure girls are never left alone with men for periods at a time. The Catholic church in particular, has a history of men and boys spending lots and lots of time together.

---

LGBTQers attempt to protect their brand by claiming a man molesting a boy isn't "gay", he's a pedophile. As if, they two were mutually exclusive. They know that a disproportionate number of child molestations are man on boy. That implicates homosexuals. They make that disappear by saying, "that man wasn't gay, he just likes kids. Specifically boys ... but hey, that's irrelevant".

---

It's utter insanity. No way they really believe this deep down.

---

Theres a lot to the mind of a pedophile - I don't really care the gender of predator/victim, but like rape isn't always about sex I don't think pedophilia genders are always about sexual orientation. You said yourself, boys are often alone with priests (for reasons that baffle me) - that makes them easier prey for the bad priests.

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

And like others have said, a church sex abuse scandal will end in an arrest. A trans flashing their junk in front of kids ends in applause from the left.

This is a woman flashing her boobs to minors. Arrest her.

TXAGFAN said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Nobody is defending this or any other example like this.

---

But you're guaranteed to show up with your whataboutisms on every single thread just like this. Why do you let it bother you? Do you really think you're going to change anyone's mind? It's tiresome.

---

Because the rhetoric from right is that LGBT people are DANGEROUS and that has real implications. Meanwhile, the real danger is all around you and people you know (most sex offenders are known to victim/family). They're your neighbor, people sitting in pews, etc. It's not the lgbt bogeyman.

---

Gender theory, queer theory, and normalizing LGBTQ lifestyle is dangerous to young people. It should be treated as such.

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

You should never normalize the abnormal, no matter what it is.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

They are still happening, every single day. Why don't you do something about it? (To pose question I'm asked all the time as if my life's work is supposed to be sex crimes - that's for the police)

---

You and many many others could stop defending, goaltending and downplaying it for starters. I think any priest or pastor who even verbally flirts or acts inappropriately provocative with little children deserves to be skinned alive. If they twerked or dressed like scantily clad hookers, death for sure.

You don't seem to care much at all when your tribe does it though. You constantly downplay and deflect and point fingers elsewhere.

We hold our own to much higher standards of decency and acceptable behavior. Always have, throughout all of human history. Your tribe has always been the ones to be overtly sexual and openly provocative and -in-your-face. Reckless sex, drugs, sex with teenagers, perverted and twisted shows involving small children etc etc etc. I won't ever take any moral lecturing from the LGBTQ brigade. Deaf ears.

---

Clergy are doing far worse, don't kid yourself.

And I'm well aware you think you have moral high road. That's the scariest thing about some of you, you think your religion justifies your hate and other actions you allude to since you've discovered you can't post your violent plans for lgbt people at large. You say creative things like "They'll be dealt with in due time" or "God will sort them out"…

---

What a psycho thing to say. Delusional. Incredible.

And I know some gay clergy are doing far worse than what I described above. I am just saying that I would be fine with torture and execution if they engaged in even softer core behavior than we see the drag queens acting out on a regular basis in front of children. Point being, I hold them to much higher standards of morality and behavior. Just as God/Jesus did.

I would be fine with life in prison for any drag queen performing provocatively in front of children. But if supposed "men of God" dressed like hookers and gyrated for children? The most painful torture followed by death.

---

Lets assume I agree with your premise that same sex victims are some sort of homosexual act (I don't, plus these coverups involve lots of people including straight ones). Your post proves perfectly how myopic you are about these crimes and that they are ALWAYS the gays as if there were NO female victims in Catholic Church coverups (or recent baptist church report or numerous LDS cases etc etc etc).

You let your point of view blind you to real dangers in this world because your politicians told you LGBT people are dangerous and that's way easier than believing Father/Pastor Bob are a potential threat.

---

Holy crap, lots to unpack here. So it's not necessarily a homosexual act for a grown man to have sex with boys? Please tell me I just need my second cup of coffee for the day and am misreading here. That's more of a stretch than people who say that bisexual men who have sex with men aren't at all gay.

And no, I don't think it's ONLY man on boy...they just make up the vast vast majority of cases...that is undeniable. To be fair, one of the reasons (imo), is that every single church I have ever known of does a pretty damn good job of making sure girls are never left alone with men for periods at a time. The Catholic church in particular, has a history of men and boys spending lots and lots of time together.

---

LGBTQers attempt to protect their brand by claiming a man molesting a boy isn't "gay", he's a pedophile. As if, they two were mutually exclusive. They know that a disproportionate number of child molestations are man on boy. That implicates homosexuals. They make that disappear by saying, "that man wasn't gay, he just likes kids. Specifically boys ... but hey, that's irrelevant".

---

It's utter insanity. No way they really believe this deep down.

---

Theres a lot to the mind of a pedophile - I don't really care the gender of predator/victim, but like rape isn't always about sex I don't think pedophilia genders are always about sexual orientation. You said yourself, boys are often alone with priests (for reasons that baffle me) - that makes them easier prey for the bad priests.

---

You think priests that prey on boys do so because that's what's available?

You don't think those priests deliberately put themselves in situations because they had access to boys?

You really believe the victims' sex was irrelevant to the offender?

one safe place said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

You should never normalize the abnormal, no matter what it is.

---

This is understated. Normalizing the abnormal is inconsistent with natural human behavior and science.

A double amputee is not physically normal. Does not mean we should treat them poorly, discriminate against them, and should make reasonable accommodations. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special so that everyone wants to go out and chop limbs off.

Heterosexual behavior in the animal kingdom, which humans are a part, is normal. Homosexual behavior is not normal. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special, particularly to elementary school kids, so that being LGBTQ+++ is the cool thing to do.

My 4-year-old just came up to me, tears in her eyes, and said "Mommy, why do the evil Republicans want to take away my gay porn books?"

I- I have no words.

— Ashley St. Clair (@stclairashley) May 2, 2023

The disgusting part of this is you know she was wetter than that pool water when doing that !!!

SHOW ME!!


Not one LGBTQ zealot has been personally harmed by any "words" from a politician on the Right.

But how many people have been killed, harassed, their businesses gutted, SC lives threatened BY THE LEFT!!!

Pull the plank out of your own eyes, before worrying about the splinter in mine.

Come on man. You lose all credibility when you can't acknowledge how much damage the Left has done to relations in this country. I would even agree that some on the right like the division too.

Lack of introspection will kill all of your hopes for change.

Plus, you sound just like a Democrat when confronted with really bad behavior you just want to point a lame finger at some nobody politicians on the Right.

You need to be better than that.

Personally, I will just add you to my ignore list because facts have no place in your heart and your mind so it is a waste of time to try and engage in meaningful conversations.

Which is what this country desperately needs right now. Bypass the parties and their leaders, bypass the propagandist media, and have real person to person conversations to try and salvage something good that still exists in the US of A.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

Brittmoore Car Club said:

---

Holy crap, lots to unpack here. So it's not necessarily a homosexual act for a grown man to have sex with boys? Please tell me I just need my second cup of coffee for the day and am misreading here. That's more of a stretch than people who say that bisexual men who have sex with men aren't at all gay.

And no, I don't think it's ONLY man on boy...they just make up the vast vast majority of cases...that is undeniable. To be fair, one of the reasons (imo), is that every single church I have ever known of does a pretty damn good job of making sure girls are never left alone with men for periods at a time. The Catholic church in particular, has a history of men and boys spending lots and lots of time together.

---

LGBTQers attempt to protect their brand by claiming a man molesting a boy isn't "gay", he's a pedophile. As if, they two were mutually exclusive. They know that a disproportionate number of child molestations are man on boy. That implicates homosexuals. They make that disappear by saying, "that man wasn't gay, he just likes kids. Specifically boys ... but hey, that's irrelevant".

---

It's utter insanity. No way they really believe this deep down.

---

Theres a lot to the mind of a pedophile - I don't really care the gender of predator/victim, but like rape isn't always about sex I don't think pedophilia genders are always about sexual orientation. You said yourself, boys are often alone with priests (for reasons that baffle me) - that makes them easier prey for the bad priests.

---

An element of rape is literally sexual contact, so yes, rape is about sex. Also, boys left alone with straight priests didn't get molested. The Catholic church scandal was a homosexual scandal.

TexasAGGIEinAR said:

---

That idiot would be lifeless and at the bottom of the pool if "it" attempted this in Arkansas. Someone needs to just start punching these people in the mouth.

---

At a minimum.

rgag12 said:

---

Aggie95 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

these two sentences don't compute.

I welcome all of your conservative/church sex abuse scandal posts. As a Catholic, I have endured plenty of those posts in the past.

---

And like others have said, a church sex abuse scandal will end in an arrest. A trans flashing their junk in front of kids ends in applause from the left.

---

The priest scandals also sour everyone, including that poster, on the church in general. Admittedly, this is perfectly understandable and what should happen. The story is all over the news and on the front page of web sites. It becomes a common theme in pop culture -- television, film, and standup.

They are ostracized in any normal, healthy society. I don't see any of this trend going the other way until that starts happening with the alphabet offenders as well.

Gradaggie05 said:

---

I didn't read past the OP.

So a dude took off his shirt in front of kids?

I can't keep up with this $h!t anymore

---

What I thought also. But, I was corrected.

What happened is some chick took off her shirt in front of kids because she said she was a boy.

Similar to a boy showering in the girls locker room because he says he's a chick.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Irish 2.0 said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

And all the boys rejoiced at the manna from heaven.

---

Highly doubt these are the types of boobs that a 15 year old boy dreams about

---

You have simply forgotten being a 15 year old.

---

I'm old enough where I remember I remember Sears and JC Penny Catalogue boobies.

---

National Geographic was in our school library.

---

As I got older, God gave us cable tv with scrambled channels nekkid women.

---

Here.

TXAGFAN said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Nobody is defending this or any other example like this.

---

But you're guaranteed to show up with your whataboutisms on every single thread just like this. Why do you let it bother you? Do you really think you're going to change anyone's mind? It's tiresome.

---

Because the rhetoric from right is that LGBT people are DANGEROUS and that has real implications. Meanwhile, the real danger is all around you and people you know (most sex offenders are known to victim/family). They're your neighbor, people sitting in pews, etc. It's not the lgbt bogeyman.

---

Gender theory, queer theory, and normalizing LGBTQ lifestyle is dangerous to young people. It should be treated as such.

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

25% of college age kids now think they are LGBTQ. It is not normal or healthy. Sometimes, keeping my actions "below ground" is my obligation to society to prevent my problem from becoming a problem for others.

---

The increased numbers were always there to an extent.

---

Face palm. Dude 25% of youth aren't really LGBT. You can deny grooming all you want, but it's breathtakingly stupid or naive or dishonesty to believe that the thousands of people that libs of tiktok highlights (who are a small sampling of the full population pushing this stuff in classrooms) aren't having an impact.

I think I'm transabled.

JMR_2016 said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

one safe place said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

You should never normalize the abnormal, no matter what it is.

---

This is understated. Normalizing the abnormal is inconsistent with natural human behavior and science.

A double amputee is not physically normal. Does not mean we should treat them poorly, discriminate against them, and should make reasonable accommodations. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special so that everyone wants to go out and chop limbs off.

Heterosexual behavior in the animal kingdom, which humans are a part, is normal. Homosexual behavior is not normal. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special, particularly to elementary school kids, so that being LGBTQ+++ is the cool thing to do.

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

---

I have known some animals to kill others of their same kind. Does not make it normal.

Its been a minute since biology class, but homosexuality in the animal kingdom is not consistent with species survival and is not selected as a preferred trait.

Pointing to a wikipedia article with two gay mallard ducks and some bisexual penguins is not doing much to convince me LGBTQ+++ needs to be taught to children as normal behavior.

Note: I am not here to judge the moral sexual behaviors of this board and its posters nor do I condone mistreatment / discrimination etc. I am pointing to what is considered normal and as normal. I do not condone teaching children things that are abnormal as normal.

Threads like these make me identify as transtarded.

JMR_2016 said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

one safe place said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

You should never normalize the abnormal, no matter what it is.

---

This is understated. Normalizing the abnormal is inconsistent with natural human behavior and science.

A double amputee is not physically normal. Does not mean we should treat them poorly, discriminate against them, and should make reasonable accommodations. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special so that everyone wants to go out and chop limbs off.

Heterosexual behavior in the animal kingdom, which humans are a part, is normal. Homosexual behavior is not normal. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special, particularly to elementary school kids, so that being LGBTQ+++ is the cool thing to do.

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

---

"Normal" has a definition. Things that happen very infrequently are, by definition, not normal. But nice try.

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm going to start posting every single church/school/conservative sex abuse case and say "look, see those _____ are all just sex abusers"

It's asinine to argue with you all - you find a story every few days and that's enough to push a false narrative in your bigoted viewpoints.

I'll say it again…if you commit a crime of any kind I don't care who you are. Some of you think this is a trend, it's not. If you want to see trends look at actual institutions involved in major coverups of this nasty behavior. See Maryland for a recent BIG one.

---

DubFalls said:

---

When you read things like this, replace the word "trans" with "not" and it helps.

---

I was going to say "fake"

Trans female = fake woman = dude -- sexual deviant with a fetish
Trans male = fake dude = actual female -- usually actual butch lesbian or autistic loner/outsider

TXAGFAN said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

safelightKL said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Slicer97 said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Nobody is defending this or any other example like this.

---

But you're guaranteed to show up with your whataboutisms on every single thread just like this. Why do you let it bother you? Do you really think you're going to change anyone's mind? It's tiresome.

---

Because the rhetoric from right is that LGBT people are DANGEROUS and that has real implications. Meanwhile, the real danger is all around you and people you know (most sex offenders are known to victim/family). They're your neighbor, people sitting in pews, etc. It's not the lgbt bogeyman.

---

Gender theory, queer theory, and normalizing LGBTQ lifestyle is dangerous to young people. It should be treated as such.

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

25% of college age kids now think they are LGBTQ. It is not normal or healthy. Sometimes, keeping my actions "below ground" is my obligation to society to prevent my problem from becoming a problem for others.

---

They have to recruit since they don't reproduce.

---

Nobody is recruiting, why would we? Most of us are fine being gay, but I don't know anyone who is looking to find more gays. Also, most of us are gay in spite of what we grew up around be it the church, Uber conservative parents, or for those of us born in 70s/80s the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We weren't recruited.

(Now someone is going to trot out that tired stat that gay men are sexually abused at higher rates, but that is not a rate to make up even a meaningful minority of gay men).

---

Dude, maam, whatever... clearly you know no-one. Ever visit Palm Springs? Their "gays" will straight up (no pun intended) scout even heterosexual men for a hook up. You're delusional.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Nobody is defending this or any other example like this.

---

Thank you for this. If we can all just put partisanship aside at times like these and call a spade a spade, we could find more middle ground.

I always try to show up on threads "calling out my side" and make sure I unequivocally state X behavior is indefensible. It is nice to see someone show up with no derailing or whataboutism to state they are against this type of behavior and children should remain innocent and out of bounds of these situations.

I promise to show up on any of your theads when I see them and clearly articulate my opinion of said activity in my very first posted response.

It is refreshing to find middle ground and point out the things we agree on, which makes our debates on other topics more civil and potentially more persuasive

93MarineHorn said:

---

Quote:

---

Can you not go to the police and report it as indecency with a minor?

---

In this case I'm not sure. I think this is a male lifeguard who identifies as female but has not had any breast augmentation. Therefore what the boys saw was just a dude with no shirt on. Unless this is a woman identifying as a man. Very confusing when you read these stories/tweets. It's why correctly used gender pronouns are necessary for effective communication.

---

Sorry if this is a repost, but I guess I didn't hit post the first time.

Rule of thumb, leftists always lie. With that in mind if think of the antonym of their statement.

If they say trans male, it is a girl
If they say trans female, it is a boy.

Staff: if my previous post was deleted because I said dick, then maybe you should censor dick like other words considered out of bounds. If it was deleted because of what I have stated here then we would appreciate understanding why biological facts are not allowed.

That's funny.

You clearly never looked at a National Geographic before.

JMR_2016 said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

JMR_2016 said:

---

fka ftc said:

---

one safe place said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Young people are lgbt, normalizing it in APPROPRIATE ways will keep them above ground.

---

You should never normalize the abnormal, no matter what it is.

---

This is understated. Normalizing the abnormal is inconsistent with natural human behavior and science.

A double amputee is not physically normal. Does not mean we should treat them poorly, discriminate against them, and should make reasonable accommodations. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special so that everyone wants to go out and chop limbs off.

Heterosexual behavior in the animal kingdom, which humans are a part, is normal. Homosexual behavior is not normal. But we do not need to celebrate and glorify them as the most special of special, particularly to elementary school kids, so that being LGBTQ+++ is the cool thing to do.

---

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

---

I have known some animals to kill others of their same kind. Does not make it normal.

Its been a minute since biology class, but homosexuality in the animal kingdom is not consistent with species survival and is not selected as a preferred trait.

Pointing to a wikipedia article with two gay mallard ducks and some bisexual penguins is not doing much to convince me LGBTQ+++ needs to be taught to children as normal behavior.

Note: I am not here to judge the moral sexual behaviors of this board and its posters nor do I condone mistreatment / discrimination etc. I am pointing to what is considered normal and as normal. I do not condone teaching children things that are abnormal as normal.

---

Well dang, I never thought to conflate homosexuality with murder. The article addresses species in which the behavior has been observed after scrolling past the first 2 pics. Classifying things into "normal" and "abnormal" leaves zero room for nuance.

I guess I'm confused on what's being taught to children. Sounds like we should teach them that homosexuality is infrequent in the animal world, but does occur. And that includes in humans. Let people live their lives and leave it at that. What more are they trying to teach? I don't have kids so I may be out of the loop.

---

You don't teach kids about sex. There is no reason to sexualize them before they even have an inkling about sexual feelings. When you do teach them, you teach them that male and females are unique complements necessary to complete the human sexual reproductive process. Any other combinations actually defeat the entire purpose of the human reproductive process and are thus suboptimal at best and should be discouraged.