Was it the selection of different data from different sources to reference or alteration of a data set itself? Those are two different things. One may be some confirmation bias but if the sources were attributed and referenced then it isn't misleading, just conflicting. The other would be fraudulent, but that would require changing numbers or reported outcomes from that of the referenced source material.

Opalka said:

---

He altered (lied) about COVID vaccine data for political purposes, and he wanted to align with the DeSantis misinformation machine.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-surgeon-general-altered-key-175951425.html

---

Florida man bad!!

Opalka said:

---

He altered (lied) about COVID vaccine data for political purposes, and he wanted to align with the DeSantis misinformation machine.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-surgeon-general-altered-key-175951425.html

---

And we lost a 20 y/o friend pre med major, devoted blood donor, active in his church and community to myocarditis after the vax.

The truth should be important. Not politics.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Was it the selection of different data from different sources to reference or alteration of a data set itself? Those are two different things. One may be some confirmation bias but if the sources were attributed and referenced then it isn't misleading, just conflicting. The other would be fraudulent, but that would require changing numbers or reported outcomes from that of the referenced source material.

---

The link given by the op does not tell us that. Just some guys saying the Florida surgeon general omitted something for political purposes.

With zero evidence.
It is laughable. But also sad.