List of those people and the associated "gifts"?etxag02 said:
And many of those same people have business before the Court. Oh noes indeed.
List of those people and the associated "gifts"?etxag02 said:
And many of those same people have business before the Court. Oh noes indeed.
No one cares about this petty bullsh**, if even true to begin with. Your political brethren are ruining western civilization and have all bust destroyed any semblance of truth and justice.etxag02 said:
And many of those same people have business before the Court. Oh noes indeed.
Please provide a case that Clarence Thomas or other members of the court appear to show unexplained favor to someone that invited them to a party or took them on a trip. You know, like the FBI straight up lying to Twitter, Instagram, Facebook about Hunter's laptop being Russian propaganda. Please show some obvious corruption that would make the public's trust so low. You can't. You can only cry about some states not letting you kill a fetus.Quote:
But emphasis is on appearance as the public's trust the Court is at its historical low.
Love this from silly Guardian piece on Thomas clerks covering costs of Christmas party: "it remains unclear what the funds were for." Gee, what could the purpose have been? Such a mystery. pic.twitter.com/C6heMeHUPf
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) July 12, 2023
Yeah. This is complete nonsense. This is the sort of thing former law clerks of judges of all stripes do in organizing social gatherings like these. And I say this as someone who has no problem questioning Justice Thomas’s conduct in the matter involving his mother’s house. https://t.co/44s0F8SgB2
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) July 12, 2023
Summary: Thomas had a Christmas Party with his current and former law clerks. The guests split some of the costs (guessing alcohol and snacks) via Venmo.
— AG (@AGHamilton29) July 12, 2023
That’s the entire story, but they quoted a crazy person who pretends to be an expert in ethics to declare it a scandal.
Anyone who takes this joke of an article remotely seriously is a shameless political hack. https://t.co/zFQHBxoWyJ
— Jonathan D. Urick 🇺🇦 (@jonathanurick) July 12, 2023