"Give me a social credit score for both Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Jordan Peterson."
Returns....
I am assuming that Petersons' "controversial view" on Free Speech is that it should exist at all.
I also love how Peterson gets a low social credit score based upon his concern about social credit systems.
For any lovers of liberty out there I apologize if you punched your monitors.
For the Concerned Moderates out there...you're welcome for the...um...happy ending.
Returns....
[Emphasis Mine]Quote:
A social credit score is a system that evaluates the trustworthiness and behavior of individuals, businesses or organizations based on various criteria1. It is mainly used in China, but some people have speculated that it could be implemented in other countries as well.
There is no official social credit score for Dr. Anthony Fauci or Dr. Jordan Peterson, as they are not citizens of China. However, based on their public profiles and achievements, one could make some assumptions about how they might be rated by such a system.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is a leading infectious disease expert and advisor to seven US presidents. He has received many awards and honors for his scientific contributions and public service, including the Ivan Allen Jr. Prize for Social Courage from Georgia Tech. He also has a high net worth and income from his federal position. Based on these factors, he might have a high social credit score.
Dr. Jordan Peterson is a psychology professor and author who is known for his controversial views on topics such as gender identity, political correctness and free speech. He has been criticized by some groups for his opposition to certain laws and policies that he considers infringing on individual rights and liberties. He has also expressed concern about the dangers of social credit systems and their impact on the entrepreneurial and financial world. Based on these factors, he might have a low social credit score.
However, these are only hypothetical scenarios based on limited information. The actual social credit score of any person would depend on many other factors that are not publicly available or transparent.
I am assuming that Petersons' "controversial view" on Free Speech is that it should exist at all.
I also love how Peterson gets a low social credit score based upon his concern about social credit systems.
For any lovers of liberty out there I apologize if you punched your monitors.
For the Concerned Moderates out there...you're welcome for the...um...happy ending.