https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11627695/Moderna-begins-trialing-mRNA-shot-injected-directly-HEART.html

Moderna begins trialing mRNA shot that is injected directly into the HEART to treat heart attack patients
The shot encodes for relaxin, a hormone which is known to improve blood flow
Patients have received the injection in a phase one trial looking at dosage levels
Moderna CEO Stphane Bancel told Sky News: 'It's like science fiction medicine'


Moderna is developing an mRNA shot that is injected directly into the hearts of heart attack and heart failure patients.

The 'vaccine' uses the same technology as the company's flagship Covid jab and is designed for people weeks or months after a heart attack to help them recover.

It works by instructing human heart cells to generate a hormone that is known to improve blood flow, helping restore damaged heart muscles.

During a heart attack, muscle cells can start to die and cannot be re-generated. Roughly one in five people who have had a heart attack will be readmitted to the hospital for a second one within five years.

Patients with stable heart failure have received the shot in a phase one clinical trial, Moderna said this week. The injection encodes for relaxin, a naturally occurring hormone that is known to improve blood flow

Patients with stable heart failure have received the shot in a phase one clinical trial, Moderna said this week. The injection encodes for relaxin, a naturally occurring hormone that is known to improve blood flow

This week, the drug maker announced that the first patients were given the injection in a phase one clinical trial.

Moderna CEO Stphane Bancel told Sky News Australia in October: 'We have now in the clinic a super exciting program where we inject mRNA into people's hearts after a heart attack to grow back new blood vessels to help revascularize the heart.

'It's a bit like science fiction medicine but that's what is really exciting to me.'

In its latest business update, Moderna this week announced that the first patients have been given the injection, called mRNA-0184, in a phase 1B clinical trial.

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Announces New mRNA Shot to Treat Heart Failure Patients

“We are now in a super exciting program where we inject mRNA in people's heart after a heart attack to grow back new blood vessels and re-vascularize the heart"https://t.co/kI3afoLU89 pic.twitter.com/zNw4rQN0Lv

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) January 11, 2023

Noting to see here, move along.

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

Why is this a sad face topic?

---

That's a sad face? I thought it was this...

Like all good Americans, I can't wait ti take this brilliant new product from science and a benevolent corporation!

I can't wait to post pictures to my Instagram showing the bandaid where the shot was given, me smiling and flexing, and me looking down on everyone who didn't have a heart attack or rejected the shot in fear.

The idiots!

Hey, did they test this one?

one safe place said:

---

Hey, did they test this one?

---

ARE YOU ANTI SCIENCE? ARE YOU A DENIER? JUST SHUT UP AND TAKE IT!

tmaggie50 said:

---

Deputy Travis Junior said:

---

Why is this a sad face topic?

---

Let me break your leg, then sell you crutches.

---

Yep. Just like the mob and protection money.

Science, man!

They kept making stuff for younger and younger kids as time went on. In order to generate even more income, they might start to develop shots for the unborn, you know, for future generations. Multi-generational shots, preventative shots, save those you will never see by taking action NOW!

Sound logic from the big pharma simps.

mRNA shots cause cardiac issues.
Cure it with a mRNA shot.

DannyDuberstein said:

---

Companies producing anti-anxiety meds really missed the boat by not claiming the name "Relaxin" first

---

At least we see one of the faces of pure evil behind the last couple years.

I know Pfizer's covid jab is causing alot of heart problems. Have they linked Moderna's jab to heart problems as well?

Buck Turgidson said:

---

I know Pfizer's covid jab is causing alot of heart problems. Have they linked Moderna's jab to heart problems as well?

---

Moderna has even higher rates of Myocarditis than the Pfizer version.

https://www.acc.org/About-ACC/Press-Releases/2022/11/07/18/58/Which-COVID-Vaccine-You-Get-Can-Impact-Myocarditis-Risk

Quote:

---

Researchers also looked at rates per million doses and the rate was 35.6 cases per million for Moderna and 12.6 per million for Pfizeran almost threefold increase after Moderna shots vs. Pfizer. Comparatively, rates of myocarditis in the general population in 2018, were 2.01 per million in people under age 40 and 2.2 per million in people over age 40.

Rates of myocarditis and pericarditis were higher with the Moderna vaccine in both males and females between ages 18 and 39, with the highest per million rates in males ages 18-29 after a second dose of Moderna.

---

Sounds like the story of the old lady that swallowed the fly, except chasing one bad treatment with the next one down the line.

Did you know the injection encodes for relaxin, a naturally occurring hormone that is known to improve blood flow? I don't think the article covered this very important aspect very thoroughly.

Somewhere Dr Kervorkian is smiling down on us. Waiting, maybe he is smiling up at us.

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

B-1 83 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

---

Why would anyone have hesitations about this? Gee...I just can't figure it out!

B-1 83 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

---

If it makes you feel better, the COVID jab really wasn't a "vaccine" either.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

---

Why would anyone have hesitations about this? Gee...I just can't figure it out!

---

Hesitations are one thing, calling something a "vaccine" when it clearly says it's not, and talking about testing when the article is about testing, is on the same level as folks wearing masks. It has become ridiculous automatic behavior with no real thought………just reaction like Pavlov's dog. B-1 is right on this one……..but just this one.

I'm a fan of new innovations but these things will need a lot of testing. People won't trust them even if they do work well due to the farce and deceptions around CoVID and the sociopathic push to force vaccinations.

Marketing 101. Create a problem you can solve.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

I'm a fan of new innovations but these things will need a lot of testing. People won't trust them even if they do work well due to the farce and deceptions around CoVID and the sociopathic push to force vaccinations.

---

And the article appears to be about……….testing.

Monkeypoxfighter said:

---

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

---

Why would anyone have hesitations about this? Gee...I just can't figure it out!

---

Hesitations are one thing, calling something a "vaccine" when it clearly says it's not, and talking about testing when the article is about testing, is on the same level as folks wearing masks. It has become ridiculous automatic behavior with no real thought………just reaction like Pavlov's dog. B-1 is right on this one……..but just this one.

---

This isn't hard to understand

V
V
V

MouthBQ98 said:

---

I'm a fan of new innovations but these things will need a lot of testing. People won't trust them even if they do work well due to the farce and deceptions around CoVID and the sociopathic push to force vaccinations.

---

Monkeypoxfighter said:

---

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

VitruvianAg said:

---

Science, man!

---

The reactions to the story scream it.

---

Moderately concerned, or concernedly moderate?

---

No, just an actual scientist who read the story before screaming "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! RNA!"

The OP even used the term "vaccine" when this isn't one, while another poster asked about testing when the article is about trials/testing.

---

Why would anyone have hesitations about this? Gee...I just can't figure it out!

---

Hesitations are one thing, calling something a "vaccine" when it clearly says it's not, and talking about testing when the article is about testing, is on the same level as folks wearing masks. It has become ridiculous automatic behavior with no real thought………just reaction like Pavlov's dog. B-1 is right on this one……..but just this one.

---

Careful………..you're going to be labeled a "COVIDIAN", a "CM", or a liberal if you keep that logical approach on this board.

Monkeypoxfighter said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

I'm a fan of new innovations but these things will need a lot of testing. People won't trust them even if they do work well due to the farce and deceptions around CoVID and the sociopathic push to force vaccinations.

---

And the article appears to be about……….testing.

---

Ohhh...OK. "Trust us this time".

That should alleviate everyone's skepticism.