Pretty cool news if you're not an anti-vaxx weirdo. This technology is the future.

Moderna cancer vaccine cut risk of melanoma reoccurrence by 44% in trialhttps://t.co/4CaRfxTlVc

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 17, 2022

The mRNA vaccines hold great promise. The anti-vaxxers will never realize it, I suppose.

Go stick your arms out and get the melanoma "vax". Just don't mandate it.

The technology has tons of promise and opportunities. But covid and treating cancer are miles apart.

Azeotroper said:

---

Go stick your arms out and get the melanoma "vax". Just don't mandate it.

---

Ok melanoma spreader.


Obviously kidding. Good point. Vaxxes should never be mandated.

You first!

As with the rona shot, I'll give it 5 years for all the long term side effects to come to light (no matter how few or many) then if I'm in a spot where it may be beneficial to get it, I'll weigh the benefits vs the risks.

Safe and effective!

Azeotroper said:

---

Go stick your arms out and get the melanoma "vax". Just don't mandate it.

---

Exactly. If my loved one could cancer the risk of their cancer coming back, that's cool. Reward likely outweighs the risk.

Or we could just mandate it for everyone and call them anti-vaxxers

In the meantime...

I protect myself with

https://www.columbia.com/p/mens-pfg-terminal-tackle-long-sleeve-shirt-FM6094.html?dwvar_FM6094_color=459pfg

and

https://www.academy.com/p/magellan-outdoors-mens-casting-crew-long-sleeve-fishing-shirt?sku=black-02-large

and

https://atlaspreservation.com/products/sun-mullet

I wear the shirts when doing yardwork, exercising etc.

Sounds like it is being studied for secondary prevention so hopefully you never need it at all.

As long as it is voluntary, I'm all for it. Why is this concept so difficult?

Tom_Fox said:

---

As long as it is voluntary, I'm all for it. Why is this concept so difficult?

---

Easier to virtue signal by referring to us as "anti-vaxxers". Makes them feel smart and enlightened.

So take poison when you're out of options?

Sounds like chemo…

Why were healthy people forced to take this by the president you voted for?

wbt5845 said:

---

The mRNA vaccines hold great promise. The anti-vaxxers will never realize it, I suppose.

---

Promise for what?

Population control?

Study results, CDC, FDA lost all trust. I immediately question any results I see and would have to dig through all the data to see how they gamed the results.

kyledr04 said:

---

The technology has tons of promise and opportunities. But covid and treating cancer are miles apart.

---

Cancer has about a 70% survival rate... Covid has a 99% to 99.9% survival rate. The odds say it all.

Would be a great thing to take to reduce reoccurrence. I hear you can't develop immunities to cancer like our bodies do to viruses, but I'm no doctor type.

99.994%

I've never been opposed to studying the technology and then once proven using the technology appropriately. My kids took all the vaccines the doctors recommended except Covid (and our pediatrician never recommended the vaccine, just asked if we wanted it). I'm guessing this post was targeting people with a similar background as myself, so tell me OP, how exactly am I anti vax?

Can I see your passport? Thanks.

Boarding pass? Thanks.

Cancer vaxx pass? Don't got it? Get the **** out of my airport cancer spreader.

Just curious - which definition of vaccine does this qualify for? The one pre-2020, or the newspeak one?

I'm enjoying the smugness of the Biden-voting OP.

I think the technology is fine, and it is promising, if properly researched and tested and not rushed or misapplied. To me it is virtue signaling of another type to dismiss it out of hand without giving it opportunity to be properly validated. Even the CoVID vaccines might eventually be refined to where they actually work as intended without potentially debilitating or deadly side effects. We simply haven't taken the time to do that.
The polio vaccine is a good example. The current vaccine is very effective with minimal occurrence of side effects, but the development process was long and involved some disastrous early attempts.

Also, if you are using the technology to target your own cells with your immune system, and a virus isn't involved, why are they calling it a vaccine with regards to cancer treatment?

Why is it so hard for some to differentiate between voluntary and mandatory? OP and their lackey calling folks anti-vaxxers show they still don't, and likely can't, understand the difference.

It's pretty sad for an attorney to take positions such as this.

You really don't see the difference here? I bet mediators and judges just love the black and white world that you live in.

Nothing like someone who takes arbitrary stances and puts their fingers in their ears when someone tries to explain how their position is actually different than what you are implying.

If you still think after almost 3 years that everyone is "anti vaxxers", you're being willfully obtuse. But I suppose that should not be surprising coming from you.

ChemEAg08 said:

---

As with the rona shot, I'll give it 5 years for all the long term side effects to come to light (no matter how few or many) then if I'm in a spot where it may be beneficial to get it, I'll weigh the benefits vs the risks.

---

More like 6-10 years

i think this is a funny mountain to post your flag. mock people who were 100% right about the jab? why do you think the mandates went away? the truth is just starting to come out.

wbt5845 said:

---

The mRNA vaccines hold great promise. The anti-vaxxers will never realize it, I suppose.

---

It's experimental just like the COVID therapeutic mRNA shots.

Moderna already got their buds down at FDA to kill some promising drugs, so they could continue with POS that they had that was not working. ROI is all they want.

This "cure" posted by the op will cost about $100,000 per shot, but see below for other options that are in trials that are NOT mrna.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11400715/Three-cancer-patients-cured-experimental-vaccine-100x-cheaper-rival-shots.html

GeorgiAg said:

---

Pretty cool news if you're not an anti-vaxx weirdo. This technology is the future.

Moderna cancer vaccine cut risk of melanoma reoccurrence by 44% in trialhttps://t.co/4CaRfxTlVc

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 17, 2022

---

Does this come with blood clots, heart damage, and higher cancer risks? LOL

wbt5845 said:

---

The mRNA vaccines hold great promise. The anti-vaxxers will never realize it, I suppose.

---

I will always remember how you acted during Covid and how you treated people on texags. You are a legitimate vaccine's worst advertisement ever.

I'd rather get cancer.