https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/08/sexual-choking-is-now-so-common-that-many-young-people-dont-think-it-even-requires-consent-thats-a-problem

The porn criminal empire is creating a younger generation of sadists and future abusers by continuously pushing the envelope with the filth they profit from.

Where are the feminists? Why don't the blue haired hairy pitted butch crowd protest outside of the porn kingpins houses who poison America's youth and destroy their female employees for 30 pieces of silver?

In all my years I've never had a chick ask me to choke her. Now, spanking, that's different.

Do staff need to merge this with the other thread? Asking for my friend Chris in Austin.

https://texags.com/forums/7/topics/3349065

Is that really…nevermind.

I have a tough time believing that is such a super popular 'kink.' But then again we have a guy who is a brazen thief in charge of some sort of nuclear policy who champions 'pup play' and is some sort of a hero to 40 percent of our population, and a president who showered with his adult daughter/niece etc.

Interesting. As recently (but more than a decade ago) choking was used to clue that the protagonist was becoming bad and losing his mind in "Basic Instinct 2" So if its somehow more kosher thats recent and ridiculous.

Once upon a time, porn was outlawed, right? Kind of like people understood the detriment to society?

wbt5845 said:

---

Once upon a time, porn was outlawed, right? Kind of like people understood the detriment to society?

---

Must have been back when the Pope was President as only theocracies do that

Somewhat related, the other issue is even when it was not fully outlawed, society willfully imposed a more `prime time' approach of a mandated space more children raising friendly.

Access and time slots is another issue, as well as mainstreaming in movies and TV.

Not this again. People like what they like. "Not asking for consent" could just mean they've already awkwardly asked for consent and had someone sign a form for the sex itself but they are just feeling out what they want. You can pretty easily find out when your hands go near the neck whether she wants it. No asking needed.

But by all means, let's outlaw porn because you don't like how people are having sex. That makes a lot of sense. How do you feel about threesomes and anal? What about fellatio? Should we outlaw those too?

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets a positive feedback.

---

Did you read the article?

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

---

Unbelievable

Urban Ag said:

---

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

---

Unbelievable

---

Actually, it's quite believable that a resident leftist would be all in favor of any kind of sexual perversion.

CDUB98 said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

---

Unbelievable

---

Actually, it's quite believable that a resident leftist would be all in favor of any kind of sexual perversion.

---

And it's quite believable that a resident "conservative" would be all in favor of only doing it missionary through a hole in a sheet. Hyperbole is fun.

CDUB98 said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

---

Unbelievable

---

Actually, it's quite believable that a resident leftist would be all in favor of any kind of sexual perversion.

---

From #metoo to lame excuses for sexual violence and rape fantasy. In what, 2-3 years?

I just can't. I need to get a coffee.

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

Notice how the closeted religious are usually the perverts? Abusing children and all that?

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

This thread is about making it harder for children to access porn.

Pinochet said:

---

Not this again. People like what they like. "Not asking for consent" could just mean they've already awkwardly asked for consent and had someone sign a form for the sex itself but they are just feeling out what they want. You can pretty easily find out when your hands go near the neck whether she wants it. No asking needed.

But by all means, let's outlaw porn because you don't like how people are having sex. That makes a lot of sense. How do you feel about threesomes and anal? What about fellatio? Should we outlaw those too?

---

Whether or not there is implied consent to sexual choking isn't really the issue at hand here, we should be asking ourselves why has choking become mainstreamed in sex? This has nothing to do with how people are having sex, and much more to do with how porn is infecting extremely impressionable youth and destroying families by normalizing extreme behaviors.

5th grade girls are being bullied because they don't do anal. Middle school girls are letting themselves get peed on to be cool.

You are an absolute disgrace to the name of Pinochet. You'd be first out of the helicopter.

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

First of all, I think most of us could agree that there is some reasonable middle ground between unfettered, easily accessible, hard core porn and young people, and outlawing or banning it.

Second, there is all kinds of harm. Your community should know that better than any demographic in this country.

I think the solution has to be to end anonymous porn. As nice as anonymity in the internet is, I don't think you can real make the argument that there is any sort of right to it. Hell, there's not even a reasonable argument that there's a right to the internet in general.

If you remove anonymity and prosecute those who circumvent authentication similarly to online gambling, you solve a lot of problems. Especially with regard to minors.

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

You're probably correct. And the majority of them were introduced and started consuming large amounts of porn in the 12-13 range. You know, when the brain is in a period of massive change and formation.

Urban Ag said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

First of all, I think most of us could agree that there is some reasonable middle ground between unfettered, easily accessible, hard core porn and young people, and outlaw banning it.

Second, there is all kinds of harm. Your community should know that better than any demographic in this country.

---

First of all, read the OP's thread title - not much ambiguity there.

Second, people like OP want things that will definitely harm my community - trust.

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

Or maybe a lot of parents that are concerned their children are getting their brain chemistry re-wired and not in a good way.

I haven't regularly attended church in years.

The Banned said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

You're probably correct. And the majority of them were introduced and started consuming large amounts of porn in the 12-13 range. You know, when the brain is in a period of massive change and formation.

---

This crowd? Feel like it skews older and even as an elder millennial online porn wasn't that common when I was that age.

You know where kids get their porn nowadays by the way since it's a regular thread topic here…Twitter.

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

Look who believes in slippery slopes all of a sudden.

93MarineHorn said:

---

In all my years I've never had a chick ask me to choke her. Now, spanking, that's different.

---

Really? I'd say more than half of my roster has been into choking.

The Banned said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

You're probably correct. And the majority of them were introduced and started consuming large amounts of porn in the 12-13 range. You know, when the brain is in a period of massive change and formation.

---

Yep. Surveys show that the youngest generation is the most in favor of banning porn. Because they're the ones that have been most negatively impacted as a result of growing up on the stuff. It's like a smoker who can't quit because he started at 11 when people thought it was fine.

Boomers and their misunderstanding of freedom is the biggest driver of ills in today's America. Why should we listen to the people that gave us the sexual revolution and all the issues associated with "free love?"

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

Look who believes in slippery slopes all of a sudden.

---

Never said I don't. Cute reply.

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

"Sexual choking" is a turn on for tons of women and doesn't actually involve choking 99% of the time. It's just doing the "hand necklace," maybe a tiny bit of pressure on the sides. No restriction of the airway. If someone is already consensually having sex with you I think it's generally fine to put your hands various places and see what gets positive feedback.

---

To be clear, actually choking someone, as opposed to putting your hand(s) on their neck, would obviously require affirmative consent. Even then it's probably a bad idea. But I'm telling you, hands on/around the neck is what people are talking about generally.

And that seems about as mild as cupping a boob or something. The kind of thing that happens in the moment during consensual sex and continues to happen if it is well received.

Urban Ag said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

Or maybe a lot of parents that are concerned their children are getting their brain chemistry re-wired and not in a good way.

I haven't regularly attended church in years.

---

Maybe, but I've learned that the loudest voices against vice are secretly committing them.

I mean, we are at the point where leftists are trying to normalize pedophilia and we've got an OP that's concerned about consent and paid adults having rough sex. The rough porn says a helluva lot more about the consumers than the industry.

The Green Dragon said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

I'd say 95% of the posters on this thread watch porn. The loudest voices are probably the front pew sitters in church and like with most vices are the most depraved.

---

Or maybe a lot of parents that are concerned their children are getting their brain chemistry re-wired and not in a good way.

I haven't regularly attended church in years.

---

Maybe, but I've learned that the loudest voices against vice are secretly committing them.

---

Where have you "learned" this? That's absurd.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Urban Ag said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

First of all, I think most of us could agree that there is some reasonable middle ground between unfettered, easily accessible, hard core porn and young people, and outlaw banning it.

Second, there is all kinds of harm. Your community should know that better than any demographic in this country.

---

First of all, read the OP's thread title - not much ambiguity there.

Second, people like OP want things that will definitely harm my community - trust.

---

I have the sick and disgusting fetish of wanting to restrict things that are bad and promote things that are good, which is doubly sick and disgusting when I claim that things such as "bad" and "good" actually exist.

I have never understood the claim that "it would actually be worse if you did something to stop grade schoolers from developing into sadists". Some people buy way too far into libertarianism for the sake of libertarianism.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

I'm sure once you make porn illegal you'll stop, right? No slippery slope of legislating morality for activities that consenting adults engage in that harms nobody.

---

Look who believes in slippery slopes all of a sudden.

---

Never said I don't*. Cute reply.

---