Trump on Twittergate

15,092 Views | 183 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by aggiehawg
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actual Talking Thermos said:

The fake news acts like he wants to terminate the whole constitution, but really he just wants to disregard any parts that would interfere with him taking power now. As anyone would who isn't a fool, apparently.

And again this is not based on some massive discovery of fake votes or anything, but on a social media site suppressing a story that could hurt his opponent. Something everybody has known happened. And Taibbi even said in his rundown that decision was internal, not made at the request of or with input from the govt.


I see that the talking point have been released.
Of course they ignore the entire deletion of posts and banning posters at the request of a political campaign.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

aggiehawg said:

Actual Talking Thermos said:

Philip J Fry said:

BMX Bandit said:

He's saying because of massive fraud the rules, including constitution. should be terminated and either he should be declared winner or revote


First, let's assume there is proof of massive voter fraud that is undeniable. What then is the remedy besides ranting about it?
Produce that proof before the electors vote and convince them to vote differently. That's it.
Rarely agree with you but that is mostly accurate. Jan 6th should have proceeded uninterrupted with the cases for fraud in multiple states presented and then voted on in each House of Congress. In the event the Senate and the House could not agree on enough electors to get to 270, go to the 12th Amendment for a contingent election.

Short of that, impeachment and removal from office is the only remedy.


Based upon the option outlined above, it makes sense that those who wanted to consolidate power with Biden as the puppet would set up a false flag riot that appeared to be from Trump followers in order to stop the process.

It also makes sense that they focus on claiming it was an insurrection rather than a protest to divert attention from their treasonous actions.

The whole 2020 election fiasco is an embarrassment to this great country. The actors really didn't do a good job of hiding their actions. It's just that too many Americans don't care about politics or are too Orange Man Bad brainwashed to notice.
From the higher altitude view, as much angst as it causes, the event actually is common in major nations. We just had all these special conceits we grew up with. America has probably had its second secession crisis (Mark Levin has talked about the one before in the 19th that was the precedent Ted Cruz was trying to reference) and by definition those are outside the written law. If there was a smooth remedy it wouldn't be a crisis. America now in very high probability has its first `usurping' government -- a product of a "palace coup" and internal forced change. Rome, Byzantium, Persia, Britain, France, Russia --- they have all had these, and their systems went on -- but only after some turmoil and in some cases removal of those involved by later parties.

We have a probably illegitimate regime in power, and this doesn't surprise because what there is no doubt of at all is it is anti-American independence, strength, and overall good economic health.

Secession crisis are periods of discontinuity -- those will do best who do not think in straight-laced terms.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Holder was on a Sunday show talking about the upcoming (tomorrow) oral arguments on Moore v. Harper regarding the following:

Quote:

Issue: Whether a state's judicial branch may nullify the regulations governing the "Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives ... prescribed ... by the Legislature thereof," and replace them with regulations of the state courts' own devising, based on vague state constitutional provisions purportedly vesting the state judiciary with power to prescribe whatever rules it deems appropriate to ensure a "fair" or "free" election.
Also known as the "independent state legislature" theory.

To no one's surprise Holder is advocating the rejection of that theory and allowing courts (and thereafter the federal government) to manage federal elections bypassing the state legislatures.

Something to watch.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

Actual Talking Thermos said:

The fake news acts like he wants to terminate the whole constitution, but really he just wants to disregard any parts that would interfere with him taking power now. As anyone would who isn't a fool, apparently.

And again this is not based on some massive discovery of fake votes or anything, but on a social media site suppressing a story that could hurt his opponent. Something everybody has known happened. And Taibbi even said in his rundown that decision was internal, not made at the request of or with input from the govt.


I see that the talking point have been released.
Of course they ignore the entire deletion of posts and banning posters at the request of a political campaign.




Taliibbi and his damn talking points!

I'm Gipper
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When COVID-19 struck, Trump even embraced The Swamp, making celebrity medical spokesmodel Anthony "Doctor" Fauci the all-but-official face of our disastrous COVID response.

Fauci's malicious advice then helped bring down Trump. At the same time, DeSantis and Kemp were fighting back against Trump's White House in not shutting down their states.

That's a big weakness.

Then last week saw Trump host Kanye West just as West began his very public meltdown.

And, by extension, nasty Nazi-lover Nick Fuentes.

He followed that up by going on Truth Social to demand the "termination of all election rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the CONSTITUTION" in order to get a 2020 do-over.

Add in the multiple awful Congressional candidates he foisted on us in 2022 who cost us the Senate- and you are looking at a string of disasters in the last 3 years.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Holder was on a Sunday show talking about the upcoming (tomorrow) oral arguments on Moore v. Harper regarding the following:

Quote:

Issue: Whether a state's judicial branch may nullify the regulations governing the "Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives ... prescribed ... by the Legislature thereof," and replace them with regulations of the state courts' own devising, based on vague state constitutional provisions purportedly vesting the state judiciary with power to prescribe whatever rules it deems appropriate to ensure a "fair" or "free" election.
Also known as the "independent state legislature" theory.

To no one's surprise Holder is advocating the rejection of that theory and allowing courts (and thereafter the federal government) to manage federal elections bypassing the state legislatures.

Something to watch.


Chip chip chip away at the foundation of the government.

Why amend the Constitution when you can just ignore it based upon some random wokeness?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like very interesting case!

I'm Gipper
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

BuddysBud said:

Actual Talking Thermos said:

The fake news acts like he wants to terminate the whole constitution, but really he just wants to disregard any parts that would interfere with him taking power now. As anyone would who isn't a fool, apparently.

And again this is not based on some massive discovery of fake votes or anything, but on a social media site suppressing a story that could hurt his opponent. Something everybody has known happened. And Taibbi even said in his rundown that decision was internal, not made at the request of or with input from the govt.


I see that the talking point have been released.
Of course they ignore the entire deletion of posts and banning posters at the request of a political campaign.




Taliibbi and his damn talking points!


Yes, selectively taking one statement and ignoring the overall message is propaganda.

Democrats and the MSM did this throughout the Trump presidency.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Further info HERE
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.