They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Other than the folks in the Biden ****ing administration?Manhattan said:
Weird I see a lot of names of people who didn't work for the government.
Commies will always commie.beanbean said:Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Yeah we get it Bagdad Bob. Nothing to see here.
Truthsam callahan said:
If the libs had the honesty and reasoning capabilities to analyze this, they wouldn't be libs.
Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
4stringAg said:Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Good grief. Stop goaltending for once in your wretched pathetic posting and realize the party and people you support daily trample the Constitution and are pure scum interested in nothing but raw naked ambition and power.
There was a time when liberals feared the govt and their power to suppress free speech. Now they openly celebrate it, goaltend for and defend it.
captkirk said:23. The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde playing a key role.
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 3, 2022
You should be at the World Cup right now. Your goaltending is world class.Manhattan said:
They either didn't work for the government or work for the government, which wasn't run by Dems.
Throughout history, folks just like those looked up in amazement when they found themselves kneeling in the ditch outside of town and cried; "you're making a mistake, I was in support of the party!"C@LAg said:
it's like they all got the same talking points at the same time....
C@LAg said:
it's like they all got the same talking points at the same time....
RoadkillBBQ said:Throughout history, folks just like those looked up in amazement when they found themselves kneeling in the ditch outside of town and cried; "you're making a mistake, I was in support of the party!"C@LAg said:
it's like they all got the same talking points at the same time....
TV folks may not show it. May have to watch Twitter live feed to watch them. Media has ruined our country.BMX Bandit said:
This really is one of biggest political scandals in US history.
The hearings are going to be "must see TV"
BMX Bandit said:
They are right about this pressure on Post story didn't come from the government, but that doesn't tell the whole story.
There's a coordination here, in secret, between a campaign and a major distributor of news to help out the campaign. If that's they way they want to go, more power to them. But that can't be done in darkness.
Also, does anyone really think tgis coordination stopped on 1/20/21? It didn't. More is going to surface.
So all the "they weren't in government" means is no one had their rights violated. That's missing forest for the trees in my opinion.
BMX Bandit said:
This really is one of biggest political scandals in US history.
The hearings are going to be "must see TV"
justcallmeharry said:
CNN says nothing to see here.
Now “journalists” are blocking us so we can’t search their Twitter history. And they’re deleting old, potentially incriminating, tweets.
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) December 3, 2022
Why did you block me @MollyJongFast?
Why did you delete this tweet?
And why did you work to cover up the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020? pic.twitter.com/O5AqnGs2Ui
BMX Bandit said:
Really have no idea. Doubt anyone here knows campaign finance law