Twitter/Hunter Biden story will be released at 5p ET. -Elon

93,214 Views | 707 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Showertime at the Bidens
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agthatbuilds said:


DAU ain't just gonna drive its damn self
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Yup, you nailed it…
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Consequences?

FBI/DOJ - probably not

The DNC and some Govt. officials - quite possibly via the largest Class Action suit in US history. A lot of lawyers are fixing to go to work 24/7 and lots of $$ is about to be redistributed.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's a least 2 emails in the thread released tonight with just that.

This is the tip of the iceberg, imo. Thisnis confirmation that govt has been colluding with social media companies which would be in direct violation of the 1A.

There's no more denying it.

Now, I also want more direct evidence in the form of emails from politicians, departments and agencies. But tonight proves its there. Just needs to be mined.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's the way this crap goes.

We all know what happened and they say "where is your proof?"

Then there is proof and they say "pretty thin"

Then there is more proof and they say "that's just stuff we already knew. This is old news"
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And we didn't "know." We presumed.

There's a big difference between presumption and knowing.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
Manhattan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whataboutism rears it's head.
MR Gadsden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sam callahan said:

That's the way this crap goes.

We all know what happened and they say "where is your proof?"

Then there is proof and they say "pretty thin"

Then there is more proof and they say "that's just stuff we already knew. This is old news"


The gaslighting you describe is already happening on Twitter. They keep using the same playbook.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
You assume this it..
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
You honestly don't think there's a lot more to this story? You think this is it?
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
There's dishonest and there's this. Not holding the Oval Office or being the majority in one of the chambers of Congress is in no way holding "no power." C'mon man! This isn't remotely true.
Post removed:
by user
Manhattan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
You honestly don't think there's a lot more to this story? You think this is it?


That's why I compared it to the Trump hearings so far. The Trump hearings day 1 was a huge nothing. The only email from democrats that came out today was a democrat asking WTF they're doing censoring a news article.
Post removed:
by user
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.

Not quite.
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.


Tonight they showed us that the Biden Campaign colluded with Twitter to suppress the laptop story. Three months ago we found out the Biden Admin colluded with Twitter to suppress dissent regarding the official covid narrative. The latter is an indisputable First Amendment violation. Your president is undeniably corrupt and here you are deflecting it. That's disgusting.
A fearful society is a compliant society. That's why Democrats and criminals prefer their victims to be unarmed. Gun Control is not about guns, it's about control.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Truvada said:

I dont see how any of this is illegal Twitter can post or delete what they want am I missing something?

Yes. You're missing the part where they took orders for who to censor by the Democrat presidential nominee. It will come out the they continued to take orders from the Biden administration* as well.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.
Sorry, but they cannot collude/partner with the govt. to undermine the 1st Amendment.
You're team going down Manhattan...just like the city itself.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LSCSN said:

Truvada said:

I dont see how any of this is illegal Twitter can post or delete what they want am I missing something?
Nope. You got it.

And you missed it too LOL
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
willtackleforfood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The story unfolds.

Right on schedule.
fredfredunderscorefred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There could be an email from Bidens chief of staff to vajayjay or whatever her name is saying:

"We know there's no evidence of hacking or misinformation, but the tres letras orgs are going to put out a notice saying this is Russian disinformation. If you could suppress the entire story, that would help us all in our concerted effort to keep trump from victory. Joe can't email but says he thanks you for keeping this personal family information hidden as much as possible. As you know, there's a lot of stuff in there showing corruption at the highest levels when joe was veep.
Veejayjay saying "sure. Whatever y'all need. You know we are here for you."
And a tres letras copied saying: "news notice going out tomorrow saying Russian disinformation"


And not a gottdamn thing would happen. Dems/libs don't give af. Concerned moderates like just be glad trump didn't win. And is people with a brain that know the above is essentially what literally happened even without the email proof, would still just be here pissed off. No "huge class action lawsuit" is coming. Nothing. Cruz and a few others will have nice sound bites and that's about it.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
beanbean said:

Oh man, some of those replies from "democracy" loving Americans.



Yes, Elon should be in jail for not censoring conservatives on social media.


And if you ask this idiot, why Elon should be in jail, he would not be able to answer you.
EskimoJoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1872walker said:

The fascists aren't too happy right now.




cry me a river!
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agthatbuilds said:

What else has twitter done?

Contributed $billions in In-kind donations to the DNC
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.
I wonder how defrauding their then-shareholders, the government, and the public will go over
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

Dan Scott said:

aggiehawg said:

Dan Scott said:

This feels like the Trump hearings. Huge hype but so far nothing we didn't already know. I want to see emails directly from DNC and Biden campaign. Also Twitter staff explicitly saying they need to censor to save Biden.
Can't click, huh?


You're a lawyer. There was no "smoking gun." Whatever the Ds are accused of, the Rs did the same. The Ds were just better at it.
You honestly don't think there's a lot more to this story? You think this is it?


That's why I compared it to the Trump hearings so far. The Trump hearings day 1 was a huge nothing. The only email from democrats that came out today was a democrat asking WTF they're doing censoring a news article.
Who was calling for the "reviews" and why was the response "handled"?
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Manhattan said:

C@LAg said:

Manhattan said:



How can Ds be accused of anything, they held no power in 2020?
they controlled the House, for the most part they run the federal administration
That's not how the federal government works.

Quote:

, they had control of the media and social media, and they controlled (and continue to control) a large part of the judiciary.

"no power" my ass.

Private companies can do whatever they want.


You're really okay with presidential campaigns actively directing the largest news source on the planet to suppress damaging information in an effort to influence elections?

Of course you are, as long as it's team D.

So now that Elon owns twitter you would be okay if DeSantis starts picking up the phone and getting Twitter to suppress and delete any damaging stories about his campaign and republicans before the next election. I guess you should be because muh private company.
. . .
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fka ftc said:

Actual Talking Thermos said:

fka ftc said:

I simply do not understand what treason is if this is not it.
A correct statement
Any person who had taken an oath of office, so all federal employees and members of both houses of congress, committed treason when requesting they censor free speech in order to overthrow the government.

My comment is how others, particularly dolts on the left who so brazenly claim muh insurrection!, do not see this.


Freedom of speech is not protected in the new government that began with the 2020 election.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

The Republican House should jump on this day 1 in January and investigate these people into oblivion.


With our GOP leader ship, they won't. They're worthless cowards.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.