gigemhilo said:
rynning said:
Won't a 23andme test either prove or disprove it?
No- its a little known secret that 23 and me really struggles with Native American ancestry. they cannot separately identify it. They even tell you so in their disclaimers.
Like for real. It really makes you wonder.
To expand further on this...
My great grandmother was supposedly full-blood Cherokee but she disassociated from the tribe when she married a white man. She is not included on the Dawes roles (what the tribes base Indian nation citizenship on).
My sister, mother and I decided to do 23 and me to help prove that we have Indian ancestry, and basically it showed we were white as could be - and thats when we found the disclaimer.
There is even some geneticists out there that are saying Indian DNA and European/Middle Eastern DNA are similar as far as the origin strands they look for (in other words, they could be original to the caucus mountains or northern africa). The problem is that does not match up with current "known" history guidelines. There are some histories out there that have been considered tall tales in the past that could make this origin work, but they conflict with what we view as established history. Bottom line - we were taught that natives came over the bearing straight and made their way down. DNA evidence does not seem to support that.
Thanks for listening to my Ted Talk!