Kinzinger was the other Republican. With Cheney gone, he's the only Republican who will say anything bad about Dear Leader.

Jan 6 Committee is done. They will refer the matter to the DOJ. What the DOJ does with any of it is anyone's guess. They probably go after Roger Stone and Giuliani, if anything at all.

When you say dear leader are you referring to your dear leader Biden?

Rapier108 said:

---

PCC_80 said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

banana republic.

theatre tribunal

bi-partisan my ass. why not 5-4. (giving the majority party their extra vote we know they will use anyways)

---

Actually I believe that it is 7-2 Dem-Repub. Most Repubs declined to participate except Cheney and (I don't remember his name). Nancy Pelosi took it upon herself to review and approve which Repubs could participate and refused several Repubs that would have actually asked questions that Nancy P. did not want asked.

---

Pelosi rejected all of the Republicans who McCarthy wanted to put on the committee. She then picked the two biggest anti-Trump "Republicans" in the House.

---

False. She rejected 2 of the 5, Jordan and Banks. McCarthey pulled the remaining 3 in retaliation.

This is just proof they have nothing at all on Trump or anything to indict him for involving Jan 6th. Otherwise, they wouldn't bother with this subpeona charade. They either want to get him up there to pepper him with completely one sided loaded gotcha questions; or make a big deal how he has something to hide for refusing their subpeona.

Not sure how it works with a former POTUS if he can ignore it or if he'll get the Bannon treatment and be charged with a process crime of contempt.

Trump should call up Nancy, fart into the receiver, and hang up.

New World Ag said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

PCC_80 said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

banana republic.

theatre tribunal

bi-partisan my ass. why not 5-4. (giving the majority party their extra vote we know they will use anyways)

---

Actually I believe that it is 7-2 Dem-Repub. Most Repubs declined to participate except Cheney and (I don't remember his name). Nancy Pelosi took it upon herself to review and approve which Repubs could participate and refused several Repubs that would have actually asked questions that Nancy P. did not want asked.

---

Pelosi rejected all of the Republicans who McCarthy wanted to put on the committee. She then picked the two biggest anti-Trump "Republicans" in the House.

---

False. She rejected 2 of the 5, Jordan and Banks. McCarthey pulled the remaining 3 in retaliation.

---

Stall on basis of having to see through first Garland's ridiculous Mar-a-Lago raid and those documents they are now going through. Set a date to say -- Nov 15th or after. If the demand gets more forceful, take it to the Supreme Court as obvious election interference. Doesn't matter if it would work, the brand would have been made for all to see.

I'll take "What is an obvious perjury trap for $500, Alex!"

New World Ag said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

PCC_80 said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

banana republic.

theatre tribunal

bi-partisan my ass. why not 5-4. (giving the majority party their extra vote we know they will use anyways)

---

Actually I believe that it is 7-2 Dem-Repub. Most Repubs declined to participate except Cheney and (I don't remember his name). Nancy Pelosi took it upon herself to review and approve which Repubs could participate and refused several Repubs that would have actually asked questions that Nancy P. did not want asked.

---

Pelosi rejected all of the Republicans who McCarthy wanted to put on the committee. She then picked the two biggest anti-Trump "Republicans" in the House.

---

False. She rejected 2 of the 5, Jordan and Banks. McCarthey pulled the remaining 3 in retaliation.

---

She should not have rejected any of them. Under all the House rules the minority picks its own members.

McCarthy was correct in then refusing to patriciate in the farce.

Of course, we all know you agree with everything Pelosi has done and this joke of a committee.

Does anyone actually pay any attention to this kangaroo court? I've not heard it discussed anywhere except by the media.

Bucketrunner said:

---

Does anyone actually pay any attention to this kangaroo court? I've not heard it discussed anywhere except by the media.

---

Which is almost like saying "discussed by its members".

I have to admit I haven't watched any of this joke of a Star Chamber but if Trump actually shows that would be must see TV. Opening statement would be glorious as would his absolute sarcastic disdain for every question.

Dumb question but, are the fences still up around the White House and is the National Guard still deployed?

Source says Trump wants to testify

Good grief, they set the trap and he says......

Swamprats 9
America 0

CyclingAg82 said:

---

Source says Trump wants to testify

Good grief, they set the trap and he says......

---

Wow. This is a surprise. But nothing clarifies like being able to speak.

Maybe Trump did what thought necessary back after November 2020 and did have some firm making a copy of everything ever posted about the election and all the events deleted in October 20 to Jan 21. Maybe even internal records of his own.

Maybe he can bring these items to the testimony. When they refuse to consider or allow them, the whole country will see its a fraud not seeking truth.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kinzinger was the other Republican. With Cheney gone, he's the only Republican who will say anything bad about Dear Leader.

Jan 6 Committee is done. They will refer the matter to the DOJ. What the DOJ does with any of it is anyone's guess. They probably go after Roger Stone and Giuliani, if anything at all.

---

Kinzinger is out too.

New World Ag said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

PCC_80 said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

banana republic.

theatre tribunal

bi-partisan my ass. why not 5-4. (giving the majority party their extra vote we know they will use anyways)

---

Actually I believe that it is 7-2 Dem-Repub. Most Repubs declined to participate except Cheney and (I don't remember his name). Nancy Pelosi took it upon herself to review and approve which Repubs could participate and refused several Repubs that would have actually asked questions that Nancy P. did not want asked.

---

Pelosi rejected all of the Republicans who McCarthy wanted to put on the committee. She then picked the two biggest anti-Trump "Republicans" in the House.

---

False. She rejected 2 of the 5, Jordan and Banks. McCarthey pulled the remaining 3 in retaliation.

---

This "committee" is extra-constitutional. It is a mockery of justice or fairness.

EKUAg said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Kinzinger was the other Republican. With Cheney gone, he's the only Republican who will say anything bad about Dear Leader.

Jan 6 Committee is done. They will refer the matter to the DOJ. What the DOJ does with any of it is anyone's guess. They probably go after Roger Stone and Giuliani, if anything at all.

---

Kinzinger is out too.

---

Bye Cheney and Kinzinger - you will not be missed

It's an illegitimate witch hunt. Why is Trump legitimizing it?

CyclingAg82 said:

---

Source says Trump wants to testify

Good grief, they set the trap and he says......

---

He will depend it be in public with his lawyers present.

They will demand it be in private with no lawyers.

titan said:

---

CyclingAg82 said:

---

Source says Trump wants to testify

Good grief, they set the trap and he says......

---

Wow. This is a surprise. But nothing clarifies like being able to speak.

Maybe Trump did what thought necessary back after November 2020 and did have some firm making a copy of everything ever posted about the election and all the events deleted in October 20 to Jan 21. Maybe even internal records of his own.

Maybe he can bring these items to the testimony. When they refuse to consider or allow them, the whole country will see its a fraud not seeking truth.

---

My issue with this.....it will be reported thru the media industrial complex, and as we know, they are idiots and have an axe to grind with Trump. From the national talking heads to the morons at the local level 95% of them drink the DNC koolaid. They will distort the facts and not report anything that vindicates Trump. What the nation sees regarding Trump will be distorted, and the *******s running that committee will get to spew their BS unchallenged.

There are few outlets that give Trump fair treatment.

Perfect venue to declare MAGA Presidential 2024 candidacy.

Tailgate88 said:

---

I'll take "What is an obvious perjury trap for $500, Alex!"

---

Which is why in the unlikely event this testimony ever occurs he just pleads executive privilege or the fifth for all questions

TRADUCTOR said:

---

Perfect venue to declare MAGA Presidential 2024 candidacy.

---

I'm done with Trump, but that would be a classic **** you. Lol!!!!

You would think a guy with all the best words wouldn't mind showing up to talk.

amercer said:

---

You would think a guy with all the best words wouldn't mind showing up to talk.

---

You would think a political party with good ideas would run on them.

OK this might actually get me to watch. Trump sparring with the Democrats face to face will be must see TV. I guarantee he brings up

Nancy's insider trading
Hunter's laptop
Ray Epps
That Chinese spy
Russia, Russia, Russia
Fake News
A litany of other things I can't think off right now.

this is going to be fun.

amercer said:

---

You would think a guy with all the best words wouldn't mind showing up to talk.

---

You've never been on the wrong side of the corrupt and evil dems tricks.

CyclingAg82 said:

---

titan said:

---

CyclingAg82 said:

---

Source says Trump wants to testify

Good grief, they set the trap and he says......

---

Wow. This is a surprise. But nothing clarifies like being able to speak.

Maybe Trump did what thought necessary back after November 2020 and did have some firm making a copy of everything ever posted about the election and all the events deleted in October 20 to Jan 21. Maybe even internal records of his own.

Maybe he can bring these items to the testimony. When they refuse to consider or allow them, the whole country will see its a fraud not seeking truth.

---

My issue with this.....it will be reported thru the media industrial complex, and as we know, they are idiots and have an axe to grind with Trump. From the national talking heads to the morons at the local level 95% of them drink the DNC koolaid. They will distort the facts and not report anything that vindicates Trump. What the nation sees regarding Trump will be distorted, and the *******s running that committee will get to spew their BS unchallenged.

There are few outlets that give Trump fair treatment.

---

On reflection I agree with you fully and C@LAg's follow-up post in the same vein. Whatever exculpatory elements he could bring to the proceedings would not get fairly rendered.

This is election interference plain and simple

It won't matter in states like California or Texas where the outcome is set in stone but the purpose is for the 2024 swing states like Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania for the race to be 51-49 in favor of the Dem instead of 51-49 in favor of Trump

They've allowed no defense whatsoever thus far. In fact, the "defense" has not even gotten to see evidence.