Oh great everyone was missing hearing from the great Liz Cheney
(D)ifferent. The left is fully in bed with the Chinese.DrEvazanPhD said:
Are they just not worried about the honey pot chinese spy?
Have to wonder how many networks will carry those live? I think I saw and ad for it on CBS tomorrow but haven't seen where else it will be aired. Not exactly a ratings bonanza.Rapier108 said:
Oh joy, all the res libs and their newest socks will be spamming F16 all day.
LINKQuote:
The clear and present danger test originated in Schenck v. the United States. The test says that the printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint or subsequent punishment unless its expression creates a clear and present danger of bringing about a substantial evil. It is a standard which is used to ascertain whether a particular speech is within the First Amendment right or not. See: Schenck v. United States (1919)
Requirements:
The clear and present danger test features two independent conditions: first, the speech must impose a threat that a substantive evil might follow, and second, the threat is a real, imminent threat. The court had to identify and quantify both the nature of the threatened evil and the imminence of the perceived danger.
Scope of the test:
The rule has been appliedwith very mixed resultsin cases involving:The "clear and present danger" rule has been held not applicable to cases involving:
- Criminal prosecutions for opposition to war
- Statutes penalizing the advocacy of the overthrow of the government by force or violence
- Attacks on courts or judges or contempt proceedings against lawyers
- Picketing
- Regulation of prison inmates' access to newspapers, periodicals, and so forth
- Incitement to commit crimes
- Breach of the peace or disorderly conduct
- Antitrust laws
- Libel cases
- Statutes regulating the conduct of labor union affairs
- Statutes governing the use of school property for non-school purposes
- Demonstrations in an inappropriate place, such as before a courthouse
Quote:
I think the single most urgent question is OK, what is the continuing clear and present danger we face now from the forces that Donald Trump unleashed."
Line Ate Member said:
Lol what freaking network is still showing that? Talk about some toilet bowl level ratings.
I thought it was tomorrow afternoon?4stringAg said:Line Ate Member said:
Lol what freaking network is still showing that? Talk about some toilet bowl level ratings.
ABC prime time
aggiehawg said:I thought it was tomorrow afternoon?4stringAg said:Line Ate Member said:
Lol what freaking network is still showing that? Talk about some toilet bowl level ratings.
ABC prime time
Ellis Wyatt said:
Adam Schiff is a far greater threat to the Republic than Donald Trump or any Trump supporter.
Not a statute situation. This is a SCOTUS decision.aggiejayrod said:
This is my shocked face at the people who write our laws not understanding them even a little bit