Tulsi Gabbard on Rogan podcast today

6,617 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
  • Tulsi is moving to Independent Party (not new news to anyone following today)
  • Asked by Joe is she plans to run for president as independent; she answers that she does not. Not a viable path for an Independent. They discussed why it is essentially impossible for an independent to win an election under current system.
  • The media is fixed for the Democrats and will not even cover Pelosi's husband's internal trading. Joe compared it to Martha Stewart going to prison and being far worse. Pelosi is basically untouchable from media.
  • Talked a lot about the Military Industrial Complex and the nearly $2 trillion dollar annual budget.
  • Joe and her discussed that there have been reports that Putin has cancer, that his advisors have made moves to allow Putin to use nuclear force even if they are not threatened by a nuclear attack.
  • They argue that we are closer to a nuclear conflict than we have ever been, and the large majority of Americans have no clue about it.

Rogan and her even ran this video from a couple of months ago where New York PSA for their citizens if we are under a nuclear attack.

Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggierogue said:

  • Tulsi is moving to Independent Party (not new news to anyone following today)
  • Asked by Joe is she plans to run for president as independent; she answers that she does not. Not a viable path for an Independent. They discussed why it is essentially impossible for an independent to win an election under current system.
  • The media is fixed for the Democrats and will not even cover Pelosi's husband's internal trading. Joe compared it to Martha Stewart going to prison and being far worse. Pelosi is basically untouchable from media.
  • Talked a lot about the Military Industrial Complex and the nearly $2 trillion dollar annual budget.
  • Joe and her discussed that there have been reports that Putin has cancer, that his advisors have made moves to allow Putin to use nuclear force even if they are not threatened by a nuclear attack.
  • They argue that we are closer to a nuclear conflict than we have ever been, and the large majority of Americans have no clue about it.

Rogan and her even ran this video from a couple of months ago where New York PSA for their citizens if we are under a nuclear attack.


Oxymoron
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2
Pinche Guero
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moving to independent, so moving out of politics
Layne Staley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I predict that Liz Cheney is going to leave the Republican party within a few days.

AND NO ONE CARED.
D-Fens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She honestly is probably Hillary's #1 enemy right now. That makes her the #1 liberal in my book.
AgOutsideAustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No workout video ?????


Thread does not deliver
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP, thanks for bulleting the highlights of the video. It's really helpful when people do that.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched it last night. Scared the **** out of me. She thinks Ukraine is probably going to end in WW3 and a possible nuclear war.

Thanks again CMs. You guys are like the Jelly of the month club. It can't be said enough.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgNav93 said:

Watched it last night. Scared the **** out of me. She thinks Ukraine is probably going to end in WW3 and a possible nuclear war.

Thanks again CMs. You guys are like the Jelly of the month club. It can't be said enough.
Yes, they are worthless. There are really only two sides now, and they need to realize. The totalitarian fascist methodology identity politics Left, vs any that believe in the old ideas of America and the West. That's it.





Quote:

  • Joe and her discussed that there have been reports that Putin has cancer, that his advisors have made moves to allow Putin to use nuclear force even if they are not threatened by a nuclear attack.
  • They argue that we are closer to a nuclear conflict than we have ever been, and the large majority of Americans have no clue about it.

That was true at times in 1983 too. We have had situations where the brink was closer than any had a clue of, and the public was more or less mercifully unaware. Cuban Missile Crisis is the exception in that it was so well known as it was happening. Another echo is Andropov was ill in 1983 (he died in Feb 1984). One thing can hope for is that any direct Russia retaliation take the form of a more covert attack aimed at actual leadership and not the use of nukes. Its one way full disaster might be avoided if it gets that bad. And it has been Putin's pattern before.

But that said, is is not a trivial thing to wonder if the `reports' in question have any substance at all. Advisors opening use of nuclear force if not threatened seems a bit dubious --- there are probably elements in Russia more inclined if anything to do force a shut down. Some oligarchs have openly done so.
Invincible Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did Rogan ask why she endorsed Joe Biden?
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Russians would have to be completely irrational to do this. What scenario could they be imagining in which initiating a nuclear conflict pays off for them?
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-buys-radiation-sickness-drug-part-long-standing-program-2022-10-07/
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Invincible Aggie said:

Did Rogan ask why she endorsed Joe Biden?
because she is a liberal. who did you want her to endorse?
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You want to know why a democrat endorsed the democratic candidate?

Probably same reason Trump supported Hillary back in the day.
Invincible Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, I am asking a loaded question in the hopes that political neophytes recognize that Tulsi on the GOP ticket as VP is a thought utterly devoid of intellect.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Invincible Aggie said:

No, I am asking a loaded question in the hopes that political neophytes recognize that Tulsi on the GOP ticket as VP is a thought utterly devoid of intellect.
If you watched the pod cast you'd know she said she wasn't going to join the republican party and that there was no place in it for her.

Stop be being a knot head. We know she's a liberal. It's just refreshing to see one with the balls to call the craziness and insanity going on in that party now.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buck Turgidson said:

The Russians would have to be completely irrational to do this. What scenario could they be imagining in which initiating a nuclear conflict pays off for them?
None really now, as not that ideologically bent as Soviet days. A few surviving while all else destroyed is not so much a fit for them.

What is kind of scary is it is a fit for the attitudes of much of the Western elite, as shown by the whole population decrease fetish, and other things. In other words -- the Western side may be more likely to accept nuclear this time around in the sense of not work super-hard to avoid it.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

Buck Turgidson said:

The Russians would have to be completely irrational to do this. What scenario could they be imagining in which initiating a nuclear conflict pays off for them?
None really now, as not that ideologically bent as Soviet days. A few surviving while all else destroyed is not so much a fit for them.

What is kind of scary is it is a fit for the attitudes of much of the Western elite, as shown by the whole population decrease fetish, and other things. In other words -- the Western side may be more likely to accept nuclear this time around in the sense of not work super-hard to avoid it.
One thing is for sure...nuclear war would finally give them their man made climate change.
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The Russians would have to be completely irrational to do this. What scenario could they be imagining in which initiating a nuclear conflict pays off for them?
Just change "initiating a nuclear conflict" to "invading Urkaine" and go find all the posts that said the same thing a year ago.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Disagree. Biden's spectacular weakness and two `invitations' made Putin's going into Ukraine a rational gamble.

What seems to have gone wrong is he mistook the Ukes for lay-downs.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

We know she's a liberal.
YOU may know that, I may know that, but many here apparently do not.
Paul Dirac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure sounds like a damn Democrat liberal to me.

We All completely disagree with EVERYTHING she says here!

Nitro Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This nonsense about nuclear war is fear mongering. There is zero chance one will ever be used. Every world leader knows it would be the end of the world if a single nuclear warhead was launched. The only country that my do such a thing is Iran to Israel. People need to educate themselves about what a nuclear bomb can do. The smallest nuclear warhead is 10x more powerful than Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
When you fall to your knees and ask God for help, don’t forget to fall back on your knees and say ‘thank you’ when He answers.- Steve Torrence
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you dont understand the russian mindset. to them, a world without Russia is not a world worth having. If they feel globohomo is about to win and the new world order is knocking on their front door, they will burn it all.
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nitro Power said:

This nonsense about nuclear war is fear mongering. There is zero chance one will ever be used. Every world leader knows it would be the end of the world if a single nuclear warhead was launched. The only country that my do such a thing is Iran to Israel. People need to educate themselves about what a nuclear bomb can do. The smallest nuclear warhead is 10x more powerful than Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
You act like "every world leader" is sane and there's never been madmen leading some of these communist countries.
Nitro Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggierogue said:

Nitro Power said:

This nonsense about nuclear war is fear mongering. There is zero chance one will ever be used. Every world leader knows it would be the end of the world if a single nuclear warhead was launched. The only country that my do such a thing is Iran to Israel. People need to educate themselves about what a nuclear bomb can do. The smallest nuclear warhead is 10x more powerful than Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
You act like "every world leader" is sane and there's never been madmen leading some of these communist countries.


And yet nothing has ever happened
When you fall to your knees and ask God for help, don’t forget to fall back on your knees and say ‘thank you’ when He answers.- Steve Torrence
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I listened to this today.

I'm not quite sure what's going on with this lady.

I don't have a negative opinion of her. I will say that.

I've listened to the episodes the past two times she's been on the show.

She sounds different in some measurable way.

She sounds spooked. She sounded extremely concerned.

Hard to get a read on her.

I don't know where she's going with this.

The highlight was when they were talking about the two party system and why you can't win as a third party candidate. Joe asked her if she would run as an independent and she said, no. Explained why it would be futile.

She didn't sound like she was going to join the republicans.

That may be what she does, but it didn't sound like it from what she was saying.

Who knows what she up to. Could be anything.
fire09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nitro Power said:

aggierogue said:

Nitro Power said:

This nonsense about nuclear war is fear mongering. There is zero chance one will ever be used. Every world leader knows it would be the end of the world if a single nuclear warhead was launched. The only country that my do such a thing is Iran to Israel. People need to educate themselves about what a nuclear bomb can do. The smallest nuclear warhead is 10x more powerful than Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
You act like "every world leader" is sane and there's never been madmen leading some of these communist countries.


And yet nothing has ever happened


It would certainly be unprecedented, but your analysis of it never happening because it hasn't before doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Maybe you can clarify beyond conjecture of relative warhead sizes.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rogan show is a pretty good litmus test.

You go on the Rogan show and **** up and you got problems.

I don't think Zuckerberg's appearance not the show went well.

Joe puts peoples feet to the fire. He'll ask the question everybody wants to know.

If you got a question in your mind, Joe is about to ask it. That's what makes him a great interviewer.

Dude went from streaming in his basement to having the biggest show in the world.

By accident.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgNav93 said:

Watched it last night. Scared the **** out of me. She thinks Ukraine is probably going to end in WW3 and a possible nuclear war.

Thanks again CMs. You guys are like the Jelly of the month club. It can't be said enough.
I listened to it too. I don't know if she 'probably' thinks its going to end in WWIII. I think her point was that the military industrial complex has too much power to allow that concern(of WWIII) to affect our decision making. And the fact that the concern is hardly discussed is deeply concerning.

She has a point.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.



agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The totalitarian fascist methodology identity politics Left, vs any that believe in the old ideas of America and the West.
You should read this.

And Im not going to debate it or comment on it because it would be a complete thread derail. But it is a great article.

Spoiler alert, it doesn't really agree or disagree with your comment. Just explains it.

Three ways to despotism
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.



Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't understand why so many conservatives fall over themselves for this woman. She is still a damn liberal. There has been conservatives here on Texags say that Desantis should have her as a running mate. She would be a worse version of Mitt Romney.
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nitro Power said:

aggierogue said:

Nitro Power said:

This nonsense about nuclear war is fear mongering. There is zero chance one will ever be used. Every world leader knows it would be the end of the world if a single nuclear warhead was launched. The only country that my do such a thing is Iran to Israel. People need to educate themselves about what a nuclear bomb can do. The smallest nuclear warhead is 10x more powerful than Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
You act like "every world leader" is sane and there's never been madmen leading some of these communist countries.


And yet nothing has ever happened
The fact that you think there is "zero chance" of a nuclear war starting b/c it hasn't happened yet is an interesting, but naive take imo. We have seen madmen throughout history with no regard for human life. They just didn't have the capability to destroy the world yet.
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

I don't understand why so many conservatives fall over themselves for this woman. She is still a damn liberal. There has been conservatives here on Texags say that Desantis should have her as a running mate. She would be a worse version of Mitt Romney.
Not sure why some of you get so upset when another "conservative" talks about her without being completely dismissive and derogatory.

She would be infinitely better than the regime running our country. But b/c she doesn't agree with all your conservative policies, she's an enemy!

Ted Cruz will never be president. If we're lucky, Desantis could be the guy. But I'd take Tulsi over every Democrat in Washington right now and many Republicans. But I've actually listened to her on JRE multiple times and watched her campaign rallies. She seems more genuine than most.

But I'm also not a strict conservative. I have both conservative and liberal views.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry dude. I will never trust her considering her thoughts on gun control.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.