I'm all for this experiment to take place between these two destinations. Please make all your flights to those two places electric. No way this goes wrong, but when it does, at least it will likely kill the people that are all for it.Quote:
Davis said when the production version enters service, Eviation wants it to have a 200 mile "useful range" on a full charge. That range would be enough to fly Seattle to Portland or Yakima to Bend, but from Seattle or Portland to Spokane would be pushing your luck. The prototype's max speed is listed as 250 knots.
C@LAg said:just put it in idle. it does not use power then.,.......aggie93 said:
With that kind of range it would be a lot of fun if you got into some weather and had to reroute and were burning energy because of the wind.
Ol_Ag_02 said:
Why don't they use props to power the e-planes. Literally wind power built right into the design.
American Hardwood said:
Usually the turn around time for a plane to deplane, refuel, board and takeoff is what, 45 minutes maybe on average? How long do you have to sit in the terminal staring out the window at your empty plane as it recharges.
I do a lot of work with Advanced Air Mobility (think unmanned air taxis).Get Off My Lawn said:
The energy density of batteries renders battery powered aircraft to the commuter niche. Skipping the traffic of a daily commute sure sounds nice… but yeah, it's kinda suck to have to pay much closer attention to the weather.
aggie93 said:
With that kind of range it would be a lot of fun if you got into some weather and had to reroute and were burning energy because of the wind.
torrid said:
Put it in a dive and windmill the motors to recharge the batteries.
Kvetch said:
Yet another area where electric is worse. democrats should be forced to fly only electric until they stop with their green new deal bull*****
Imagine if we actually spent our resources developing useful, viable technology that improved air travel.
I guarantee you they aren't putting much money into long range air travel using electric power...blacksox said:Kvetch said:
Yet another area where electric is worse. democrats should be forced to fly only electric until they stop with their green new deal bull*****
Imagine if we actually spent our resources developing useful, viable technology that improved air travel.
What do you think Boeing does with its multi-billion dollar R&D budget??? Just because some people are investing in potential future technologies does not mean that everyone else has scrapped improving existing ones.
This is capitalism 101.
.Ag with kids said:I guarantee you they aren't putting much money into long range air travel using electric power...blacksox said:Kvetch said:
Yet another area where electric is worse. democrats should be forced to fly only electric until they stop with their green new deal bull*****
Imagine if we actually spent our resources developing useful, viable technology that improved air travel.
What do you think Boeing does with its multi-billion dollar R&D budget??? Just because some people are investing in potential future technologies does not mean that everyone else has scrapped improving existing ones.
This is capitalism 101.
Ag with kids said:I do a lot of work with Advanced Air Mobility (think unmanned air taxis).Get Off My Lawn said:
The energy density of batteries renders battery powered aircraft to the commuter niche. Skipping the traffic of a daily commute sure sounds nice… but yeah, it's kinda suck to have to pay much closer attention to the weather.
The whole initial concept for the next 10 years is Urban Air Mobility...just using them in cities. I will say that DFW is going to be one of the first cities that has this adopted.
Weather is a huge part of the plan for allowing the flights to be scheduled.