So this becoming more popular with libs to save the planet from climate change. It makes the soil used nutrient dense. Currently they give the soil back to the family. However, with the coming food crisis. I am confident the government will eventually say the soil is too valuable to not be used and it will be put in use to grow crops. It will become law " To Save the planet "

Some people might think I am crazy for saying this, but how many other things 25 yrs. people thought would NEVER happen, and yet here we are !!

Will be interesting to see where the vegans/plant-based crowd land on this.

Is it called soilent green?

There is no God.

And people are just ambisexual blobs of flesh, to be thrown away and discarded if inconvenient

So, what's the problem?

Why go through the lengthy and laborious process of converting people to soil, from soil to plants, from plants to food? Much more efficient to cut out all those middle steps and go straight from people to food.

Argument coming soon....

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Disgusting.

The ultimate in recycling tag line: 'Yesterday's food is now today's food'

They are already pumping treated sewer water back into reservoirs

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Because, culturally and spiritually, even in death we continue to value life and respect for our ancestors. Our thoughts turn to them and maybe something more,

which suggests higher meaning, at least in our beliefs, than just walking compost.

Pookers said:

---

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Disgusting.

---

"By the sweat of your brow you will eat your bread, until you return to the ground because out of it were you taken. For dust you are, and to dust you shall return." -Genesis 3:19

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Well, I don't want to be forced to eat food marinated in YOU because that is the only option due to government regulations.

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust..........

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Wow, it only took one post later to get to the foundation argument that leads to someone suggesting people-food. That was much quicker than I expected.

AGinHI said:

---

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Because, culturally and spiritually, even in death we continue to value life and respect for our ancestors. Our thoughts turn to them and maybe something more,

which suggests higher meaning, at least in our beliefs, than just walking compost.

---

There is a waning respect for the living body by far too many people. Why should we expect any better of the dead?

It's Brave New World.


I'm an Alpha.
Which means there was only one of me in the artificial womb.

Tanya 93 said:

---

It's Brave New World.


I'm an Alpha.
Which means there was only one of me in the artificial womb.

---

I thought it was 1984.

torrid said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

It's Brave New World.


I'm an Alpha.
Which means there was only one of me in the artificial womb.

---

I thought it was 1984.

---

No.
There is a line as Lenina and Henry fly over one of the plants and see the smoke


"We can go on being socially useful after we are dead."

The bodies are burned to make phosphorus for fertilizer.

Problem is, they are usually not natural deaths but medically assisted

Tanya 93 said:

---

torrid said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

It's Brave New World.


I'm an Alpha.
Which means there was only one of me in the artificial womb.

---

I thought it was 1984.

---

No.
There is a line as Lenina and Henry fly over one of the plants and see the smoke


"We can go on being socially useful after we are dead."

The bodies are burned to make phosphorus for fertilizer.

Problem is, they are usually not natural deaths but medically assisted

---

So...actual Killing Fields, then.

Organic burial pods

Squadron7 said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

torrid said:

---

Tanya 93 said:

---

It's Brave New World.


I'm an Alpha.
Which means there was only one of me in the artificial womb.

---

I thought it was 1984.

---

No.
There is a line as Lenina and Henry fly over one of the plants and see the smoke


"We can go on being socially useful after we are dead."

The bodies are burned to make phosphorus for fertilizer.

Problem is, they are usually not natural deaths but medically assisted

---

So...actual Killing Fields, then.

---

It is people too old to be considered useful.

Call it what you want.
It is an amazing novel.

American Hardwood said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Because, culturally and spiritually, even in death we continue to value life and respect for our ancestors. Our thoughts turn to them and maybe something more,

which suggests higher meaning, at least in our beliefs, than just walking compost.

---

There is a waning respect for the living body by far too many people. Why should we expect any better of the dead?

---

Yes. But we have not totally degraded ourselves.

I consider it one more nail in the coffin-like redefining marriage-of the complete secularization of society.

What people may think is benign, insignificant, and even antiquated and obsolete, in light of our progressive beliefs, may in fact be of great importance to civilization.

hunter2012 said:

---

---

Soylent Red was made from people. I think the planet people will go straight to Soylent Red and not even bother with Soylent Green since it was made from seaweed which eventually killed the oceans in the movie. They would rather euthanize old people, especially Republicans, than hurt the oceans.

Compost is a no-no, but scattering ashes is ok? What happens to those ashes in the plant world?*


*As a Roman Catholic, I'm not really for either (keep the body together, cremated or not), but it is certainly …….food for thought.

I think either Washington or Oregon already passed something like this a couple of years ago.

Rapier108 said:

---

Pookers said:

---

cbaker20 said:

---

As long as it's composted properly and not infectious I don't see why this is problematic. Embalming is weird. I wouldn't mind returning to the earth when I'm no longer in need of my body.

---

Disgusting.

---

"By the sweat of your brow you will eat your bread, until you return to the ground because out of it were you taken. For dust you are, and to dust you shall return." -Genesis 3:19

---

Yeah, these *******s plan on throwing people into "liquid crematoriums" and spraying their remains all over the fields. Its actually been legalized in Washington state (liquid cremation).