Student Loan Forgiveness Reasoning

14,056 Views | 191 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
YNWA.2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just genuinely curious on everyone's thinking/reasoning on this topic. (I know I am starting the umpteenth thread on this topic, but wanted to attempt to have a civil conversation in one place. Difficult with the Zoo, I know). Just quickly glancing through the multiple threads on here, it seems the vocal majority are against this and I am curious as to why. Apart from the "Biden is a communist" comments which have no real merit and comments that "Congress should be doing this," which is a different conversation, I am trying to find a reasonable argument as to why this is a bad thing.

It seems that many of those against this graduated many moons ago (I graduated in 2013) and went to college at a very different time when tuition wasn't what it is today. The total federal student debt has more than tripled since 2007 when it was about $500 billion to the $1.6 trillion today. In the years since graduation, including my own, states continue to cut funding towards public college and education. So what's been done to combat this? Skyrocketing tuition and mountains of student debt.

I don't think many 17-18 year-olds fully understand what they are signing up for when they apply for federal student loans. Interest alone can oftentimes be a killer. I have many peers who have never missed a payment and owe more now than they initially did when they graduated because of these interest rates and not being able to pay towards the principal. According to the US Department of Education, about 60% of people with federal student loans owe <$40,000. Which I know may not seem like a lot, but to those making under $80,000 (these include your nurses, your kids' teachers, their coaches, your physical therapists, your social workers, your reporters), it make take many years to get out of. And if you're spending so much time and money paying off these loans, you are not buying other goods and services and not investing your money which keeps you in this spiral for longer. Not to mention that this disproportionately affects minorities as they borrow an average of $25,000 more and make about $5,000 less (but we can save this discussion for another time.)

The other sentiment that I don't quite understand is "Well, I worked hard to pay off my loans, my wife's loans, my Cousin Joe's loans." This is a wonderful achievement and should be celebrated. But the thought of these high loans has deterred many people from seeking higher education. And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.

"But how will we pay for it" and "It is just going to add to the national debt." It's funny how these arguments only come about when trying to help the lower and middle classes. None of this gets brought up when we go to war, when multibillion dollar corporations get another tax cut, etc. I don't know about you, but I would rather my taxes go toward education, veterans' benefits, etc that actually helps my fellow Americans and pushes us forward.

None of this addresses the root cause of the problem, which I think is the increasingly high tuition that schools charge that is primarily taken on by individuals. Public schools should be primarily funded by the government. Your taxes pay for your local elementary, middle, and high schools. Why does this not include higher education too if it is basically mandatory to have if you want a decent paying job?

Now these are just the thoughts of a thirty-something millennial and proud Aggie who was fortunate enough to have financial and emotional support from his parents, scrapped for as many scholarships as I could, went to graduate school, and still had a lot of loans to pay. I was also lucky enough to be able to move in with my parents after graduation for two and half years to live rent-free and make a sizeable dent on my loans before venturing out on my own. My wife and I are on track to pay off all student loans by the end of the year. I worked hard and am proud of how far I have come, but it should not be this difficult or this expensive to seek higher education and make a better life for yourself. I want my kids to do even better than I have done, but I would like for the deck to not be stacked against them or anyone else trying to better themselves or society.

I hope my thoughts come across as reasonable and understandable as they did in my head. I welcome any and all discussion points as I would like to understand all sides of whatever argument you may have.

Thanks & Gig'Em
-FTA c/o 2013
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When a person borrows money and agrees to pay it back, they should do it. The end.

Goodnight Irene
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because it is a contract.
Todd 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

When a person borrows money and agrees to pay it back, they should do it. The end.




This!!!

And if they don't understand that, who should we blame?

Parents? Banks? Schools?

18 year olds are adults. Time to start acting like it! Life comes at you fast sometimes.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YNWA.2013 said:



I

The other sentiment that I don't quite understand is "Well, I worked hard to pay off my loans, my wife's loans, my Cousin Joe's loans." This is a wonderful achievement and should be celebrated. But the thought of these high loans has deterred many people from seeking higher education. And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.







Education =/= college.

Imagine having a PhD in which you wrote your thesis on the love letters between flemish lesbian sheep merchants in the 17th century? You'd be "highly educated" on a topic, that would in turn have literally zero value to society, other than to teach a class at a liberal arts school about flemish lesbian sheep merchants in the 17th century. Society needs skills, not niche academics
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YNWA.2013 said:

Just genuinely curious on everyone's thinking/reasoning on this topic. (I know I am starting the umpteenth thread on this topic, but wanted to attempt to have a civil conversation in one place. Difficult with the Zoo, I know). Just quickly glancing through the multiple threads on here, it seems the vocal majority are against this and I am curious as to why. Apart from the "Biden is a communist" comments which have no real merit and comments that "Congress should be doing this," which is a different conversation, I am trying to find a reasonable argument as to why this is a bad thing.

It seems that many of those against this graduated many moons ago (I graduated in 2013) and went to college at a very different time when tuition wasn't what it is today. The total federal student debt has more than tripled since 2007 when it was about $500 billion to the $1.6 trillion today. In the years since graduation, including my own, states continue to cut funding towards public college and education. So what's been done to combat this? Skyrocketing tuition and mountains of student debt.

I don't think many 17-18 year-olds fully understand what they are signing up for when they apply for federal student loans. Interest alone can oftentimes be a killer. I have many peers who have never missed a payment and owe more now than they initially did when they graduated because of these interest rates and not being able to pay towards the principal. According to the US Department of Education, about 60% of people with federal student loans owe <$40,000. Which I know may not seem like a lot, but to those making under $80,000 (these include your nurses, your kids' teachers, their coaches, your physical therapists, your social workers, your reporters), it make take many years to get out of. And if you're spending so much time and money paying off these loans, you are not buying other goods and services and not investing your money which keeps you in this spiral for longer. Not to mention that this disproportionately affects minorities as they borrow an average of $25,000 more and make about $5,000 less (but we can save this discussion for another time.)

The other sentiment that I don't quite understand is "Well, I worked hard to pay off my loans, my wife's loans, my Cousin Joe's loans." This is a wonderful achievement and should be celebrated. But the thought of these high loans has deterred many people from seeking higher education. And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.

"But how will we pay for it" and "It is just going to add to the national debt." It's funny how these arguments only come about when trying to help the lower and middle classes. None of this gets brought up when we go to war, when multibillion dollar corporations get another tax cut, etc. I don't know about you, but I would rather my taxes go toward education, veterans' benefits, etc that actually helps my fellow Americans and pushes us forward.

None of this addresses the root cause of the problem, which I think is the increasingly high tuition that schools charge that is primarily taken on by individuals. Public schools should be primarily funded by the government. Your taxes pay for your local elementary, middle, and high schools. Why does this not include higher education too if it is basically mandatory to have if you want a decent paying job?

Now these are just the thoughts of a thirty-something millennial and proud Aggie who was fortunate enough to have financial and emotional support from his parents, scrapped for as many scholarships as I could, went to graduate school, and still had a lot of loans to pay. I was also lucky enough to be able to move in with my parents after graduation for two and half years to live rent-free and make a sizeable dent on my loans before venturing out on my own. My wife and I are on track to pay off all student loans by the end of the year. I worked hard and am proud of how far I have come, but it should not be this difficult or this expensive to seek higher education and make a better life for yourself. I want my kids to do even better than I have done, but I would like for the deck to not be stacked against them or anyone else trying to better themselves or society.

I hope my thoughts come across as reasonable and understandable as they did in my head. I welcome any and all discussion points as I would like to understand all sides of whatever argument you may have.

Thanks & Gig'Em
The big problem with this is that these types of programs continue to grow and grow and grow. If you don't limit or police the process, it will just continue to grow. How many irresponsible people are now just gonna go on vacation or buy some luxury item with this handout from the government.

When I did divorce law, during a mediation, the other attorney, mediator and I had to take a break and go in another room to ***** about our clients getting food stamps when they were pulling in six figures income. There are people who rip the system off, no matter how well intentioned it is.

Some students will be incentivized to take out more loans and bankers will be incentivized to make more loans. This won't make the process better, it will make it worse.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.

Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

When a person borrows money and agrees to pay it back, they should do it. The end.


It is this simple.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it "reasonable" to give big banks 300 Billion? Because that is what happened.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/081216/who-actually-owns-student-loan-debt.asp
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

When a person borrows money and agrees to pay it back, they should do it. The end.
EOT
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I graduated same time period as you.

The biggest issue is that this doesn't solve anything. It doesn't address the cost of college increasing at insane rates, and it doesn't stop people from putting themselves in impossible debt to get a degree they will never pay back.

In fact, it encourages people to be irresponsible in the future with loan payments, and it costs the tax payers by devaluing our currency even more. In 10 years we will have just as many people in even more debt as a result of this.

It's just terrible policy that is equivalent to your student body President promising no more homework.

You seem to think it's a good idea for everyone to go to college. I disagree. A HS degree should be the only education needed to compete in the work force. College should be reserved for people looking for white collar jobs and rich kids that want to learn liberal arts and can afford that. We should be modernizing the HS degree to make sure this is happening. But instead, we have made the HS education so ****ty that you almost have to go to some college to even get a blue collar job. And now if you want a white collar job, a grad school degree is becoming more and more necessary. How does turning the college degree into a HS degree help anyone? It just straddles everyone with immense costs, especially those who flunk out after a few semesters with nothing to show for it.

Quote:

But how will we pay for it" and "It is just going to add to the national debt." It's funny how these arguments only come about when trying to help the lower and middle classes. None of this gets brought up when we go to war, when multibillion dollar corporations get another tax cut, etc.


How does this help out the Low and middle class? The large majority of college debt is held by people who's parents are in the top 25% of earners. And besides, the same type of people struggling now will still be struggling in 10 years as college continues to just get more expensive.

It's just a bad system that we are only encouraging to get worse by these kinds of policies.
TxTarpon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is all to buy votes.

Like Obongo's student loan forgiveness plan that has a 98% application rejection rate, this plan will sounds great on TV, but in practice will not give out much forgiveness.
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nurses make bank.

Teachers already have specific loan forgiveness programs.

Physical therapist don't need to attend A&M and live in a nice apartment to be trained.

Get a loan? Pay it.
Aggrad08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

When a person borrows money and agrees to pay it back, they should do it. The end.




I'm down with this as long as we don't ever bail out banks or corporations also.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible?


LOL hell no. How would society function with a bunch of PHDs in gender studies? We need blue collar workers way more than we need a bunch of over educated morons running around. This idea that college is for everyone is what got us in this spot to begin with.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many checkboxes did this concerned moderate checkoff, 4 or 5.

It's as if they're following a script.
The Lost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely Not A Cop said:

I graduated same time period as you.

The biggest issue is that this doesn't solve anything. It doesn't address the cost of college increasing at insane rates, and it doesn't stop people from putting themselves in impossible debt to get a degree they will never pay back.

In fact, it encourages people to be irresponsible in the future with loan payments, and it costs the tax payers by devaluing our currency even more. In 10 years we will have just as many people in even more debt as a result of this.

It's just terrible policy that is equivalent to your student body President promising no more homework.


I definitely couldn't afford today, what I did when I graduated around y'all. I'd be halfway sympathetic if this solved the problem, it not touching the problem is complete bs, especially with such a high income cut off. Cap it at 40k and I'd be less pissed, if you're making over 50 or have a graduate degree, 100% shouldn't be included. That unfortunately doesn't hit the voters they want to buy, so here we are.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YNWA.2013 said:

Just genuinely curious on everyone's thinking/reasoning on this topic. (I know I am starting the umpteenth thread on this topic, but wanted to attempt to have a civil conversation in one place. Difficult with the Zoo, I know). Just quickly glancing through the multiple threads on here, it seems the vocal majority are against this and I am curious as to why. Apart from the "Biden is a communist" comments which have no real merit and comments that "Congress should be doing this," which is a different conversation, I am trying to find a reasonable argument as to why this is a bad thing.

If you are struggling to find a "reasonable argument" as to why this is a bad thing, then you are not very good at assessing what qualifies as a "reasonable argument."

Quote:

It seems that many of those against this graduated many moons ago (I graduated in 2013) and went to college at a very different time when tuition wasn't what it is today. The total federal student debt has more than tripled since 2007 when it was about $500 billion to the $1.6 trillion today. In the years since graduation, including my own, states continue to cut funding towards public college and education. So what's been done to combat this? Skyrocketing tuition and mountains of student debt.
Tuition and related costs will continue to go up as long as the government subsidizes student loans, particularly when the money is handed out regardless of the prospects of the borrower making enough money to pay back the loan. Someone that goes to an expensive private school only to get a degree that lands them in a low paying job is only able to do that because they are not making a cost/benefit analysis when they borrow the money. Get the government out of the student loan market, and make these loans dischargeable in bankruptcy, and you will find that lenders will no longer be willing to finance $100,000 in student loan debt for gender studies degrees. You will also find that lenders will not loan money for student housing with amenities that are usually only found at the very highest end of the rental market. And, you will find that colleges will have to cut costs (lay off a bunch of administrators) in order to get enough buyers for what they are selling. They could start by firing all the DEI staff.

Quote:

I don't think many 17-18 year-olds fully understand what they are signing up for when they apply for federal student loans. Interest alone can oftentimes be a killer. I have many peers who have never missed a payment and owe more now than they initially did when they graduated because of these interest rates and not being able to pay towards the principal. According to the US Department of Education, about 60% of people with federal student loans owe <$40,000. Which I know may not seem like a lot, but to those making under $80,000 (these include your nurses, your kids' teachers, their coaches, your physical therapists, your social workers, your reporters), it make take many years to get out of. And if you're spending so much time and money paying off these loans, you are not buying other goods and services and not investing your money which keeps you in this spiral for longer. Not to mention that this disproportionately affects minorities as they borrow an average of $25,000 more and make about $5,000 less (but we can save this discussion for another time.)
Whose talking points are you copying here? Most of the relief granted by this illegal loan forgiveness executive order will go to higher income earners. Virtually every White House staffer at the junior levels will benefit. As noted above, you don't need a fancy degree to be a teacher, or a coach, and I really don't care if social workers or reporters find $100,000 in student loans to be a bad investment.

Quote:

The other sentiment that I don't quite understand is "Well, I worked hard to pay off my loans, my wife's loans, my Cousin Joe's loans." This is a wonderful achievement and should be celebrated. But the thought of these high loans has deterred many people from seeking higher education. And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.
Who is being deterred from seeking higher education? The problem is actually the reverse of this: too many people are pursuing degrees when they will only marginally benefit from them, if at all. Again, you're copying someone's talking points with this "move forward" garbage, which has a long history as a socialist slogan (always moving forward, being on the right side of history, etc.).

Quote:

"But how will we pay for it" and "It is just going to add to the national debt." It's funny how these arguments only come about when trying to help the lower and middle classes. None of this gets brought up when we go to war, when multibillion dollar corporations get another tax cut, etc. I don't know about you, but I would rather my taxes go toward education, veterans' benefits, etc that actually helps my fellow Americans and pushes us forward.
Again with the education pushing "forward" garbage. Adding another $300 billion to the government debt just to bail out a comparatively privileged class of people is just another tax on the poor who really get clobbered by the effects of inflation.

Quote:

None of this addresses the root cause of the problem, which I think is the increasingly high tuition that schools charge that is primarily taken on by individuals. Public schools should be primarily funded by the government. Your taxes pay for your local elementary, middle, and high schools. Why does this not include higher education too if it is basically mandatory to have if you want a decent paying job?
There are plenty of "decent paying jobs" that don't follow the college track. People should pursue college when it will be economically beneficial to them. The belief that we'd all be better if everyone went to college is BS. People need to make rational decisions, and higher education should be geared towards career betterment, and not seen as the same kind of baseline knowledge that people get in K-12 education.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn that was brutal. Just a thorough beat down the entire time.
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YNWA.2013 said:


"But how will we pay for it" and "It is just going to add to the national debt." It's funny how these arguments only come about when trying to help the lower and middle classes. None of this gets brought up when we go to war, when multibillion dollar corporations get another tax cut, etc.

This is just flat-out false.

People argue all the time in favor of limiting useless government spending. But no one in Washington, D.C., ever does anything about it.

PhatMack19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These are the Dem talking points that they are running with now


rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Tex100
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My son is in college now. My email is listed with the school. I get many emails enticing him to take out student loans.


I borrowed a lot to go to law school. Paying the loans back sucked. But guess what. No one forced me to borrow the money.
aggrad02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think twk just taught him more than his four year degree did.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggrad02 said:

I think twk just taught him more than his four year degree did.
you think the OP is here to learn anything, they are here to gaslight
Tex100
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PhatMack19 said:

These are the Dem talking points that they are running with now



that is stupid.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrEvazanPhD said:

YNWA.2013 said:



I

The other sentiment that I don't quite understand is "Well, I worked hard to pay off my loans, my wife's loans, my Cousin Joe's loans." This is a wonderful achievement and should be celebrated. But the thought of these high loans has deterred many people from seeking higher education. And isn't it in the best interests of our society as whole to be as highly educated as possible? I am of the belief that the more educated we all are, the more informed decisions we can make, and the better we can all move forward.







Education =/= college.

Imagine having a PhD in which you wrote your thesis on the love letters between flemish lesbian sheep merchants in the 17th century? You'd be "highly educated" on a topic, that would in turn have literally zero value to society, other than to teach a class at a liberal arts school about flemish lesbian sheep merchants in the 17th century. Society needs skills, not niche academics


speaking to the part you bolded. and furthering your point in response

people with a masters degree or higher think joe biden is doing a good job at a 50/49 ratio.

now tell me college education amd a masters degree makes you smart.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YNWA.2013 said:

I don't think many 17-18 year-olds fully understand what they are signing up for when they apply for federal student loans.
so, 17-18 year olds are not smart enough to understand this, but 6 year olds are old enough to determine what sex they want to be and whether they need a sex change. Ok.
young eugene
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Lost said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

I graduated same time period as you.

The biggest issue is that this doesn't solve anything. It doesn't address the cost of college increasing at insane rates, and it doesn't stop people from putting themselves in impossible debt to get a degree they will never pay back.

In fact, it encourages people to be irresponsible in the future with loan payments, and it costs the tax payers by devaluing our currency even more. In 10 years we will have just as many people in even more debt as a result of this.

It's just terrible policy that is equivalent to your student body President promising no more homework.


I definitely couldn't afford today, what I did when I graduated around y'all. I'd be halfway sympathetic if this solved the problem, it not touching the problem is complete bs, especially with such a high income cut off. Cap it at 40k and I'd be less pissed, if you're making over 50 or have a graduate degree, 100% shouldn't be included. That unfortunately doesn't hit the voters they want to buy, so here we are.
This is my hardest part to fathom. I can have some sympathy for someone who dropped out, making low to min wages and still has some debt, but to pay off debt of someone making $125K is insane. With a $125K salary, that's probably about $4K $8K! a month after tax, and could pay off $10K of debt in a few months if they wanted. At this level, why even have a cap at all?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How in the hell is this "helping" all the middle class people that did not go to school, but worked their way up in a trade or started as unskilled labor, and didn't take on those debts or benefit from the education, but are now being asked to pay part of the debts of others either through taxes or increased inflation?

It hurts the poor. It hurts the middle class that never had loans or paid their loans off.

Why should all these other people suffer because some people were reckless or lazy or just simply want to dump part of their responsibility on others if the opportunity is there?

ALL debts are paid. They just might not be paid by those who agreed to them, and are dumped on those who didn't agree instead. How is that in any way ethical? It isn't,
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PhatMack19 said:

These are the Dem talking points that they are running with now





Are these people so stupid that they don't know most working people got tax cuts under trump?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is very nakedly the Democrats robbing less educated voters that went for Trump to reward more educated voters that went for Biden. If they give the Democrat group a bunch of money at the expense of those more likely to support Trump, they hope to help their own financial support at the expense of support for Trump.

It's selfish and greedy ruthless politics at its core.
No Longer Subsribed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First, Biden has no legal authority to act, because Congress has not given him the legal authority to unilaterally waive loan requirements. He is not a king or a dictator. His people are claiming that he has the authority to do it because of the "emergency" brought on by Covid? Emergency? It wasn't an emergency two months ago when he declared that Covid was no longer an emergency so he could end the use of Title 42 let more illegal immigrants cross the border. He's just making it up.

Second, why not waive the loan of the A/C guy who decided to forego college and got a small business loan to start his business? Or the plumber who needed a loan to buy a truck to do his job? How about landscapers, waitresses, mechanics, entrepreneurs? He's not helping them because they are not credentialed. They are the deplorables. They don't work on his staff. They are not good enough. People who went to college to study gender fluidity are better than the putz who mows the lawn. It's an insult to people who work for a living. 80% of his staff will get loans waived under this program. But not the regular guys who make sure that that **** goes down president poopy pants drain.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

PhatMack19 said:

These are the Dem talking points that they are running with now





Are these people so stupid that they don't know most working people got tax cuts under trump?


And that the vast majority of taxes are paid by the wealthy and upper middle class.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.