Hey hey hey. Watch it. I'm a theocratic fascist, not JUST a fascist. I'll let it slide this time

Manhattan said:

---

D-Fens said:

---

This country doesn't even care about Hunter cheating on his wife with his dead brother's widow, knocking up a stripper, and having an incestuous sexual relationship with his underage neice. Why would it care about adultery among non-crack smoking squares?

---

This country doesn't care about the president cheating on his wife, paying women off and having the same lawyer who paid off those women pay for the abortion of the ....

---

UP to that point, I thought you were talking about Clinton.

What is up with this religious caliphate b.s. on here recently.

Obvious troll is obvious. Take out the trash, staff....please.

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

WaltonAg18 said:

---

I bet OP and his ilk have some particularly juicy search histories.

This is all just a shame-fetish at this point, I'm convinced.

---

always, you can't stand that people might not be as ugly or as degenerate as you are. You have to pretend like their wives or cheating on them, or they're having affairs on the side.

Arachnophobe huh? You must secretly want to bang spiders.

---

I love how they instantly go to "if you are against this kind of behavior then you must secretly do it or engage in it yourself." They cannot fathom a person having morality based upon faith in God.

---

Kind of like how you guys have all assumed that that those of us who are less religious couldn't possibly have committed monogamous relationships to our wives. Really we just want to **** everything in sight and have no basis to act otherwise.

No denying that the batty theocract threads are well attended. Really puts the butts in the seats.

Tex117 said:

---

What is up with this religious caliphate b.s. on here recently.

---

We've been chanting "Hey Hey Ho Ho Secularism has got to go" in the hallways for weeks, you haven't heard us?

Urban Ag said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

D-Fens said:

---

This country doesn't even care about Hunter cheating on his wife with his dead brother's widow, knocking up a stripper, and having an incestuous sexual relationship with his underage neice. Why would it care about adultery among non-crack smoking squares?

---

This country doesn't care about the president cheating on his wife, paying women off and having the same lawyer who paid off those women pay for the abortion of the RNC finance chair so why would we care about Hunter Biden?

---

You know, the thing is, I actually did care. I condone none of Trump's BS antics. Made me sick to think that while Melania was home with baby Barron he was banging some nasty porn star. Disgusting. But yeah, I voted for him. Twice. And I would be lying if I said I didn't like most of his policy positions. He was good for our country in that regard, very good.

And who else was I going to vote for? Sucks huh?

---

Exactly. We all did care but it's not like we had any real choice. It was Trump or a bunch of GOP establishment idiots who care nothing about us or it was vote for Democrat that is member of the global elite who wants to destroy our way of life.

Take the Federal govt. out of marriage and let God sort it out.

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

I am of the opinion that adultery should be punishable by a minimum of 1 year in prison for every violation... I also think that you should not be allowed to marry at all unless you get a religious marriage.

---

So you want the state.to punish people for violating religious rules...? Yeah no.

TheHulkster said:

---

No denying that the batty theocract threads are well attended. Really puts the butts in the seats.

---

Personally

I hope some do not have a daughter named Mayella.

Malibu2 said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

WaltonAg18 said:

---

I bet OP and his ilk have some particularly juicy search histories.

This is all just a shame-fetish at this point, I'm convinced.

---

always, you can't stand that people might not be as ugly or as degenerate as you are. You have to pretend like their wives or cheating on them, or they're having affairs on the side.

Arachnophobe huh? You must secretly want to bang spiders.

---

I love how they instantly go to "if you are against this kind of behavior then you must secretly do it or engage in it yourself." They cannot fathom a person having morality based upon faith in God.

---

Kind of like how you guys have all assumed that that those of us who are less religious couldn't possibly have committed monogamous relationships to our wives. Really we just want to **** everything in sight and have no basis to act otherwise.

---

I never said you couldn't have a committed relationship, only that adultery shouldn't matter to you because promiscuous behavior cannot be judged.

Tex117 said:

---

What is up with this religious caliphate b.s. on here recently.

---

We've been here a long time. We may disagree on what denomination should be dominate but we agree on social norms and religious morality.

RebelE Infantry said:

---

Of course this is the ideal. But when that breaks down such questions must be resolved by the government. That's kind of the point of government.

---

The government began its public health prevention measures in the name of an admirable cause: pandemic prevention and public health. It then proceeded to make freedom-stomping **** up after **** every day for over two years. How could you watch that and then propose this moronic idea with a straight face?

To wit, who's going to define cheating? Is it just intercourse or can I legally be the married cunnilingus king of the American south? What about emotional cheating? A single kiss? Do those get you a year of hard time too? And how are any of these actions even proven? Are the cops going to barge into people's homes and demand their unwashed undies for testing? And how do you plan to prevent fraudulent accusations?

This is why you guys are idiots. You desire a law that's necessarily nebulous and rife for abuse, and then propose to put a bunch of proven sociopaths in charge of it.

I skipped pages 2-4 but just want to point out that the founding fathers did declare that a mora society was imperative to the success of our republic. Sure seems to be holding true.

Your assertion that promiscuity cannot be judge has not been proven. This is a logical fallacy that you were committing over and over again in this thread.

So OPs religion requires the state to enforce his religious marriage through coercion? That's an interesting philosophical path to go down.

RyanAg12 said:

---

I can't believe I read through all three pages of this nonsense, thus far.

OP (and others who agree) are the reason that Christians - and subsequently, the Republican Party - are viewed as whackos. Who the F*** are you to decide these things? You believe a certain way. Good for you. If that is what it takes for you to not cheat on your spouse, then for your sake, I'm glad you found some sort of aid to prevent it.

I didn't have a "religious" wedding, and if you're telling me that my marriage means nothing, then you can f*** right off. I'm not sure why I was hooked into this ridiculous topic, but I just couldn't read this anymore without saying something. The original post sounds like some cooky, cultish, mindset.

Edit: I'm a political Republican. People like this just kill the party.

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Many religions encourage multiple wives, is thus accounted for, OP?

---

This is a majority Christian country, and in this country we will continue down the same roadmap that has made Western Civilization the best civilization to ever grace this earth.

They can do what they want to in other countries.

---

Are Mormons christian?

javajaws said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

I am of the opinion that adultery should be punishable by a minimum of 1 year in prison for every violation and it should be the only valid reason for divorce.

---

So you believe a person should have to stay married to a physically or verbally abusive spouse. Spreadsheet updated.

---

This is dumb and dishonest.

If you beat your spouse you go to jail.

The definition of divorce is separation.

Malibu2 said:

---

Your assertion that promiscuity cannot be judge has not been proven. This is a logical fallacy that you were committing over and over again in this thread.

---

This is exactly what the left says all of the time constantly, everywhere. It's continuous on Social media and dating apps. Not only that, it's straight up glorified.

How about we make marriages autoexpire after five years unless renewed?

If you get married in the church of, "**** off OP," where open marriages are the only marriages, do you still have to go to jail for practicing your religious beliefs in your religious marriage?

Adverse Event said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Many religions encourage multiple wives, is thus accounted for, OP?

---

This is a majority Christian country, and in this country we will continue down the same roadmap that has made Western Civilization the best civilization to ever grace this earth.

They can do what they want to in other countries.

---

Are Mormons christian?

---

No, No, Hell no.

Adverse Event said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Many religions encourage multiple wives, is thus accounted for, OP?

---

This is a majority Christian country, and in this country we will continue down the same roadmap that has made Western Civilization the best civilization to ever grace this earth.

They can do what they want to in other countries.

---

Are Mormons christian?

---

No

CM Trump Voter said:

---

OP is the evidence that conservatism is rotting from the inside with mega church and "muh pappy told me" feelz.

I remember when conservatism cared about small government, personal responsibility and fiscal soundness.

---

We cared about small government when our populace wasn't absolutely bat**** crazy. We're a prison and you're saying you want to return back to the time when there were no guards because everyone was a lot nicer than, and you're failing to connect the two.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

javajaws said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

I am of the opinion that adultery should be punishable by a minimum of 1 year in prison for every violation and it should be the only valid reason for divorce.

---

So you believe a person should have to stay married to a physically or verbally abusive spouse. Spreadsheet updated.

---

This is dumb and dishonest.

If you beat your spouse you go to jail.

The definition of divorce is separation.

---

it's not dishonest. i have been in evangelical churches that believed divorce was not biblically justified in cases of physical abuse.

Malibu2 said:

---

Your assertion that promiscuity cannot be judge has not been proven. This is a logical fallacy that you were committing over and over again in this thread.

---

Dude logical fallacies have morphed from an actual argument to a mechanism to allow people to be hypocrites without having their hypocrisy judged.

Explain how you get to moral objectivism without a metric; explain how anything is wrong in a morally relativistic sphere.

What I always find intriguing is the far right element posters almost ALWAYS have no AgTag. Not to say that they aren't Aggies, but most certainly points to the fact that this is a new iteration of a poster that was likely permabanned for trolling.

I have to remember that before engaging,

Silian Rail said:

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Silian Rail said:

---

Adverse Event said:

---

Many religions encourage multiple wives, is thus accounted for, OP?

---

This is a majority Christian country, and in this country we will continue down the same roadmap that has made Western Civilization the best civilization to ever grace this earth.

They can do what they want to in other countries.

---

Are Mormons christian?

---

No, No, Hell no.

---

So Mormons aren't Christian, but they identify as Christian?

Do we need a pope to sort out these theological conundrums?

BCG Disciple said:

---

So OPs religion requires the state to enforce his religious marriage through coercion? That's an interesting philosophical path to go down.

---

Adultery used to be a crime everywhere and used to granted the person who got cheated on 100% of the assets. No fault divorce has been one of the biggest disasters for marriage in this country's history.

This is merely a return to adultery being a crime like it was in the past.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

javajaws said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

I am of the opinion that adultery should be punishable by a minimum of 1 year in prison for every violation and it should be the only valid reason for divorce.

---

So you believe a person should have to stay married to a physically or verbally abusive spouse. Spreadsheet updated.

---

This is dumb and dishonest.

If you beat your spouse you go to jail.

The definition of divorce is separation.

---

So if someone goes to prison their marriage is nullified? Pretty sure it doesn't work that way...