**** off

Lol at that picture, that can't be real.

Every time I see that ugly ass green background my brain automatically shuts down.

Jmiller said:

---

The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.

---

A swing and a miss yet again!

Now do slavery.

All SCOTUS did was return the decision of abortion to the people to vote on in the various states.

Of course his highness is worried about rights being rolled back. But don't worry, the court also expanded gun rights/protection, which he didn't note was awesome, since those were also crucial to kicking the kings troops out.

I don't believe they've ever apologized for burning the white house. I'm waiting, Harry. Any day now.

As an added FYI, in this same pitiful little speech, he also spewed the typical climate change garbage before promptly hopping onto his private jet for the 57th time this year.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Jmiller said:

---

The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.

---

^ Desperately wants to be ruled by a King/Dictator and not some pesky Constitution that only gives rights as written and not phony made up leftists rights that only exist if you shut your eyes and believe hard enough

---

The Constitution doesn't give rights. It's simply enumerates them and restricts (or is at least meant to) the federal government from infringing upon them. But I agree with the rest of your point.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Sorry Harry

SCOTUS ruled (correctly) that there IS no constitutional right to an abortion and never was. Try putting down the crack pipe and keep up with the rest of the class

---

Amen!

Go home limey!

He's right. For starters, the 2nd and 10th Amendments have been decimated.

jwoodmd said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.

How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.

---

Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?

---

You clearly miss the point

A member of the monarchy telling us we are wrong about Democracy and Freedom?

What's next, Hitler telling us we are anti-Semitic?

We haven't had to deal with Britain's BS in 246 years. Why should we start listening now?

jwoodmd said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.

How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.

---

Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?

---

I don't care about what he said and didn't watch or read it. However it is all over the news and obviously on this site so it is being pushed in my face so my opinion is for him to STFU and go crawling back to his Grandmother or he can just stay in California and carry his wife's purse that she keeps his balls in.

The issue is not really about him so much as it is about whomever thought he should speak to the UN and whomever keeps wanting to push stories about him. There is clearly an agenda behind pushing this moron just as there was one for pushing a Swedish teenager on the Autism scale to be an expert in Climate Change. If you want to have a real debate about facts do so but that isn't what these folks want. They want to manipulate Low Information Voters to do their bidding based on emotion.

He marries Kamala Markle yet he becomes the duchess of suckess.

Why the hell do we care about a guy that turned his back on his elitist family, but still leaves and elitist life. Why the hell we have the facination on England and the royal family escapes me. I don't give two ****s about those pedifiles....the english should have done what the french did and drug the royals from their homes and off with the heads.

Question: When Harry and Meghan's synapses fire in the woods, do they create a thought?

TaxLawAg said:

---

He is such a *****.

---

he really is!!

no wonder we decided to F the British up back in 1776!!

aggie93 said:

---

jwoodmd said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.

How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.

---

Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?

---

I don't care about what he said and didn't watch or read it. However it is all over the news and obviously on this site so it is being pushed in my face so my opinion is for him to STFU and go crawling back to his Grandmother or he can just stay in California and carry his wife's purse that she keeps his balls in.

The issue is not really about him so much as it is about whomever thought he should speak to the UN and whomever keeps wanting to push stories about him. There is clearly an agenda behind pushing this moron just as there was one for pushing a Swedish teenager on the Autism scale to be an expert in Climate Change. If you want to have a real debate about facts do so but that isn't what these folks want. They want to manipulate Low Information Voters to do their bidding based on emotion.

---

100% bombs on target

Jmiller said:

---

The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.

---

Words missing from this soliloquy: Constitution and derivatives thereof.

His own ****hole country doesn't even have protected free speech,

WTF is he talking smack about us?

Exactly which Constitutional freedoms are being rolled back? Is it the continual legislation attempting to erode the 2A? He simply makes a general statement in passing with zero backing or explanation.

C@LAg said:

---

#BREAKING: At the United Nations, Prince Harry calls out "the rolling back of Constitutional rights in the United States" as part of "a global assault on democracy and freedom." pic.twitter.com/RnJNmkPDcp

— Forbes (@Forbes) July 18, 2022

---

The statement is pretty accurate. He may have meant it in some misleading way (for example, a reference to abortion), but if you just read it as a stand-alone statement, it's true. There is a global rise in totalitarian behavior, including in the US, that infringes on individual rights.

LMCane said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

jwoodmd said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.

How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.

---

Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?

---

I don't care about what he said and didn't watch or read it. However it is all over the news and obviously on this site so it is being pushed in my face so my opinion is for him to STFU and go crawling back to his Grandmother or he can just stay in California and carry his wife's purse that she keeps his balls in.

The issue is not really about him so much as it is about whomever thought he should speak to the UN and whomever keeps wanting to push stories about him. There is clearly an agenda behind pushing this moron just as there was one for pushing a Swedish teenager on the Autism scale to be an expert in Climate Change. If you want to have a real debate about facts do so but that isn't what these folks want. They want to manipulate Low Information Voters to do their bidding based on emotion.

---

100% bombs on target

---

aggie93 usually is. Very accurate `bombardier'.

Buck Turgidson said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

#BREAKING: At the United Nations, Prince Harry calls out "the rolling back of Constitutional rights in the United States" as part of "a global assault on democracy and freedom." pic.twitter.com/RnJNmkPDcp

— Forbes (@Forbes) July 18, 2022

---

The statement is pretty accurate. He may have meant it in some misleading way (for example, a reference to abortion), but if you just read it as a stand-alone statement, it's true. There is a global rise in totalitarian behavior, including in the US, that infringes on individual rights.

---

No. He was absolutely talking about abortion. He also made sure to throw in "climate change" and "misinformation", too. He is a dumbazz liberal (redundant I know).

Buck Turgidson said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

#BREAKING: At the United Nations, Prince Harry calls out "the rolling back of Constitutional rights in the United States" as part of "a global assault on democracy and freedom." pic.twitter.com/RnJNmkPDcp

— Forbes (@Forbes) July 18, 2022

---

The statement is pretty accurate. He may have meant it in some misleading way (for example, a reference to abortion), but if you just read it as a stand-alone statement, it's true. There is a global rise in totalitarian behavior, including in the US, that infringes on individual rights.

---

He didn't mean it in a "misleading" way. He meant it in the complete and total opposite way, which is the problem with looking at this clip as a stand alone statement.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Jmiller said:

---

The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.

---

Because we learned more since that time period? Because of science? Slavery was still perfectly legal in that time frame, for example, along with many other now unacceptable precedents. The matter is one of constitutionality in the USA. It is in there, or it isn't, and it can be added for those who are willing to put forth the effort instead of being lazy.

Fact is, rights were expanded in a legislative sense: rights to democratic representation at the state level for the people to create the law that best fits their sensibilities. The people can chose and are free to do so.

---

A scientific argument was not used by the Supreme Court.

This idea that all rights have to be enumerated in detail within the Constitution ignores our history and pretends as if the 9th does not exist.

Quote:

---

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

---

Was the original "right" found to established based on the 9th in previous case law? If not, the court was still right and the process of establishing it must start over to give it legitimate foundation if it was not enumerated.

Since Little Harry Hewett can claim- more or less- direct lineage to the Hanoverian George III, one must take what he says with some prejudice.

Sounds to me that a stay in a nice cushy Russian jail is what he needs.

That mother****er hasn't worked a day in his life. I can't stand how the people of this country worship royalty. We fought a war to free ourselves from that trash, and now it seems like we fall all over ourselves so that we are in their good graces.

FPH

***** would likely be speaking German right now if it wasn't for us…