DOJ Reproductive Rights Task Force

3,549 Views | 42 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by medwriter
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

This "task force" is responding to a non-existent problem. The bullsh** that Biden and his cronies have slung about states prosecuting women who travel out of state is just false. None of the laws in effect or likely to be passed in the future criminalize travel to another state. Even Texas' unique use of civil action to enforce its abortion statute does not apply to actions taken out of state. There are no laws that prevent the ability of people "inform and counsel each other about the reproductive care that is available in other states." This promise is damned ironic in the light of this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers (Elizabeth Warren Leads the Bloodlust Brigade in the Democrat Party Targeting Pregnancy Centers on Behalf of Abortion). DOJ claims it will step up enforcement of the grotesque Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACES) Act. This is the same DOJ that allows pro-aborts to literally block the entrances to the homes of Supreme Court justices.

As I've said, I am not a lawyer, but in light of Dobbs, it is doubtful that carving out special federal protection for abortion clinics and not for any other business will survive a challenge.
Link

Good grief.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Call it what it is. ANTI-Reproductive Rights.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They have not other way to energize their base that is bailing on them. Or worse, not caring anymore.
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I wonder if there is a DOJ 2nd Ammendment task force...
tk111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Federal government getting between a woman's right to choose...to have her child and give it up for adoption. Or access to contraception to prevent pregnancy.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag In Ok said:

They have not other way to energize their base that is bailing on them. Or worse, not caring anymore.
It all about getting college "educated" white women to the polls as they now comprise the single biggest chunk of the Democrat base.

For these fools, nothing is more important than killing unborn children.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
DCPD158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't understand this. Where does this ruling hinder someones right to reproduce? All it effects is the outcome of the reproductive act. Basically, the consequences of poor choices.
Company I-1, Ord-Ords '85 -12thFan and Websider-
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Rapier108 said:

Ag In Ok said:

They have not other way to energize their base that is bailing on them. Or worse, not caring anymore.
It all about getting college "educated" white women to the polls as they now comprise the single biggest chunk of the Democrat base.

For these fools, nothing is more important than killing unborn children.
And the most foolish chunk.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCPD158 said:

I don't understand this. Where does this ruling hinder someones right to reproduce? All it effects is the outcome of the reproductive act. Basically, the consequences of poor choices.

Especially when abstinence is 100% effective every time it's tried.
Trump will fix it.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCPD158 said:

I don't understand this. Where does this ruling hinder someones right to reproduce? All it effects is the outcome of the reproductive act. Basically, the consequences of poor choices.

This. It prevents the male and female from care-free whoppie without consequences. Sorry. You can feed Molloch another way.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're going to employ radicals and activists to assess a nonexistent problem. This is how you get taxpayers to provide funding for leftist extremists to continue their issue advocacy.
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Staunchly promoting murdering of the unborn as choice of "reproductive rights"

while simultaneously staunchly denying health care rights to people choosing to not receive an experimental vaccine.

Insane, immoral, hypocritical authoritarians.
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zarathustra said:


I wonder if there is a DOJ 2nd Ammendment task force...


It's called the ATF and it's an anti-2nd amendment task force.
MGS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pinochet said:

Zarathustra said:


I wonder if there is a DOJ 2nd Ammendment task force...


It's called the ATF and it's an anti-2nd amendment task force.


I believe it's called Operation Choke Point
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do men have "reproductive rights"?

Since they are responsible also, do they have any say so?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our federal government is our enemy and should be treated as such.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No. Enjoy your "privilege."
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOJ: Department of Jaggoffs
pfo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Merrick Garland is a radical leftist. Thank God McConnell stopped Garland from being on the Supreme Court.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How about "Baby Killing Squad".....
Texas Yarddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

Call it what it is. ANTI-Reproductive Rights.


They constantly do this and people just go along with it

Patrot Act
Affordable Care Act

The labels are always the exact opposite of the outcome.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Orwellian Newspeak from DNC and their NewsSpeakers.

DOJ has no credibility of any impartial claim any more.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Yarddog said:

Tailgate88 said:

Call it what it is. ANTI-Reproductive Rights.


They constantly do this and people just go along with it

Patrot Act
Affordable Care Act

The labels are always the exact opposite of the outcome.
The communists did this too. Any country name starting with "People's Republic" or "Democratic Republic" is almost certain to be a communist country.
Trump will fix it.
Biz Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tk111 said:

this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.
Elizabeth Warren weighs in:

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biz Ag said:

tk111 said:

this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.
Elizabeth Warren weighs in:


I recall when the Crisis Pregnancy Center in BCS changed their name to Hope Pregnancy Center. Then I heard on the news of an abortion clinic in Louisiana called Hope something or other. Methinks this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Trump will fix it.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tk111 said:

this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.


have you seen the pro choice crowd? seriously if you have you would not ask this question. but i agree they do suck.
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This administration is desperate, aggressive, and lawless in its efforts to implement its highly progressive agenda. The efforts are increasingly frantic in anticipation of losing control of both the House and Senate in January 2023.

Nothing attempted by the current regime should be a surprise.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why is it that 99% of the pro-abortion crowd is made up of people who nobody would, or could, impregnate anyway?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FYI, a special task force is not needed. If "reproductive rights" are actually a civil right, there's an entire division in DOJ addressing only those. Civil Rights Division.

Garland directs OLC to write an opinion saying abortion is a right and voila, Civil Rights Division is invoked.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biz Ag said:

tk111 said:

this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.
Elizabeth Warren weighs in:


Elizabeth should charter flights to her reservation. I hear their procedures are permanent.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biz Ag said:

tk111 said:

this White House trying to shut down counseling services provided by Crisis Pregnancy Centers

I cannot comprehend how even the most fervent pro-choice advocate could walk along side this.
Elizabeth Warren weighs in:


That is pure evil right there. Satan is holding a special place in hell for her.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reproduction has already occurred at conception. The reproductive act is already history.

Nobody is taking that right away.

Progressives and their constant need to redefine words is maddening.

medwriter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Constitutionally protected right." Um, no it isn't DEAR. And isn't this something, just one more example of the war that is taking place right before us. A Justice Department that is defying one of our arms of government. Unbelievable. All of this is coming to a head and boy, November is going to be a slaughterhouse, and the left won't like it. That's my prediction.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.