TH36 said:

---

Burrus86 said:

---

Looks like parts of Austin

---

Not that I'm any great fan of this city I grew up in but they've actually cleaned a bunch of it up. It had gotten to the point of looking like Portland around here then they had a large clean up. It is still very very bad but the a lot of the HUGE camps that were under overpasses and stuff have been cleaned up.

Still a s***hole….

---

Didn't Abbott do that?

TAMU1990 said:

---

TH36 said:

---

Burrus86 said:

---

Looks like parts of Austin

---

Not that I'm any great fan of this city I grew up in but they've actually cleaned a bunch of it up. It had gotten to the point of looking like Portland around here then they had a large clean up. It is still very very bad but the a lot of the HUGE camps that were under overpasses and stuff have been cleaned up.

Still a s***hole….

---

Didn't Abbott do that?

---

I'll be honest, I didn't really play close enough attention to who did it. I just noticed on my commutes into work I started seeing less and less bum camps. Got to watch a big one burn down one day while stuck in traffic….that was fun. I rolled down the window and yelled let it burn.

I grew up in Austin too. My old neighborhood is the barrio - Rundberg and Lamar. Barrington Elementary graduate. But my parents picked up after 6th grade and moved to Williamson county.

WHY do we keep using the term "homeless"? It was invented in 1980 by liberals when Reagan was elected president to somehow say his policies and high home prices were putting people on the streets.

Give these people a home and NONE of their problems are solved.

They are...

Drug addicts that should be in rehab or jail
Mentally ill that should be in an asylum
or Bums... who just want to live without a job or a roof over their head - run them out of town.

It's a lot easier to just call them homeless.

clobby said:

---

It's a lot easier to just call them homeless.

---

The woke term is "unhomed". Meaning, they were made "unhomed" by someone else (presumably a white, straight, male capitalist pig).

pfo said:

---

All decent people should flee these democrat run ****holes. Once their tax base leaves, these horrible places will collapse.

---

Absolutely not. Most of the people in California have voted for the policies that made the place a ****hole. There is a good percentage of those voters who you would think are "decent people" if you met them. Everybody who votes for or supports that stuff should stay right where they are and suffer to consequences.

will25u said:

---

Watch this video, and tell me San Francisco is not failing their children.

This is so horrible to watch. Sad.

Don't just watch the first few second. Watch the whole video.

Wow… this is what kids in San Francisco have to walk through to get home from school… watch till end pic.twitter.com/zMdsC16Jlf

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 9, 2022

---

One Louder said:

---

clobby said:

---

It's a lot easier to just call them homeless.

---

The woke term is "unhomed". Meaning, they were made "unhomed" by someone else (presumably a white, straight, male capitalist pig).

---

They also like to describe them as "people experiencing homelessness"

I've been to San Francisco. It's both a beautiful place to visit and a horrible place to live.

San Francisco's main slum is called Oakland.

Marcus Brutus said:

---

Liberals, white liberals

---

Liberals are white trash .., what a bunch of losers, these people could F up a junk yard