If you have a problem with prostitutes near a church you must be unfamiliar with my man Jesus Christ

Definitely Not A Cop said:

---

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Except that most of the women involved in prostitution are victims and caught up in a practice they can barely escape.

The "2 consenting adults" is myth.

Ministries like the Net in Fort Worth with compassionate citizens and Churches are bridging the gap and are being a lifeline to the women (truly victims) and reaching out to the men that are requiring paid sex.

https://www.thenetfw.com/

---

Looking at Europe, I don't think legalization reduces the sex slave stuff either way. It's about the same from what I recall. But I think that legalization at least gives the victims more leeway to report the aholes in the world.

You would really need to require legal brothels zoned with irregular health code inspections and require they are all full time employees for it to ever be close to a non-shady industry. Otherwisethe worst people in society will continue to use and dispose of girls, regardless of whether it's legal or not.

---

Perhaps, but we as men drive the train here. Without demand from men, women wouldn't be forced to engage legally or illegally, victimized or not.

Unfortunately the brokenness of men will drive most of our major societal ills, from the breakdown of the family to abortion to paid sex.

Keeper of The Spirits said:

---

If you have a problem with prostitutes near a church you must be unfamiliar with my man Jesus Christ

---

LOL. Nice troll job.

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Figure a rich Tesla owner would go for escorts, not streetwalkers

---

Oh, you'd have to go back about 5 years and at least 4 usernames to find out what he's into. I think it was on the GB but it was an epic deep dive shall we say.

Win At Life said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

If two consenting adult men bet $10,000 each to have a knife fight to the death in the privacy of their own bedroom, should the government have nothing to say about this?

---

The winner gets a self defense plea for sure.

Godspeed to all hookers.

The libertarian in me says legalize and control, like weed. Regardless of MY moral views on the matter, people should be allowed to make these choices for themselves.

By control I mean reasonable restrictions on participating in these activities should be restricted by age and location as some have noted above.

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

What if you get her pregnant? Would you marry her and love your hooker child?

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Now do contract for murder

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

I would like to engage in the (illegal) sale of banned substances. Both parties are consenting adults.

Please provide your address.

Kvetch said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Should we allow prostitutes to loiter near schools and churches? Should you be allowed to publicly solicit sexual business?

Seems like a pretty stupid idea to me.

---

Churches would likely be a common meetup point. Who doesn't love their fried chicken?

The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

Just think, pulling into the strip center just outside the neighborhood, walking into a once upon a time Subway, but now we are talking about the hypothetical footlong. There is a flat fee and anything over the time limit is added.

When it is too hot to fish, too hot for golf, and too cold at home....... Just saying it could save a marriage.

IndividualFreedom said:

---

The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

Just think, pulling into the strip center just outside the neighborhood, walking into a once upon a time Subway, but now we are talking about the hypothetical footlong. There is a flat fee and anything over the time limit is added.

When it is too hot to fish, too hot for golf, and too cold at home....... Just saying it could save a marriage.

---

Agreed

I hope you aren't involved in a school system or raising children. Zero zoning for this activity is the dumbest thing I've heard in a while.

Kvetch said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Should we allow prostitutes to loiter near schools and churches?

---

We have limits on alcohol and sexually oriented businesses when it comes to schools. I don't see why there can't be the same limits with prostitution. At the end of the day, the difference between a prostitute and banging a chick you met at the bar is the money exchanged. Let's be honest...if Uncle Sam could easily get their cut, this wouldn't even be an issue.

Quote:

---

Should you be allowed to publicly solicit sexual business?

Seems like a pretty stupid idea to me.

---

There are radio ads and billboards all over Houston for strip clubs and toy shops. How is this any different?

HollywoodBQ said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Prostitution should be legal everywhere. Business between two consenting adults should never be regulated by the government.

---

Figure a rich Tesla owner would go for escorts, not streetwalkers

---

Oh, you'd have to go back about 5 years and at least 4 usernames to find out what he's into. I think it was on the GB but it was an epic deep dive shall we say.

---

It's a very good thread

Newsome spends his time empowering crack whooers while the reservoirs shrink and the cities rot. Sounds about right.

BTW men have been over paying for sex for years. Just look at all the mansions, fancy restaurants, and fancy cars.

You don't pay a prostitute for sex, you pay her to leave, so you can have a peaceful existence free of the nagging only women can bring to every situation

itsyourboypookie said:

---

BTW men have been over paying for sex for years. Just look at all the mansions, fancy restaurants, and fancy cars.

You don't pay a prostitute for sex, you pay her to leave, so you can have a peaceful existence free of the nagging only women can bring to every situation

---

Bold take...all women are prostitutes.

Don't believe me? Don't buy your wife an anniversary/Valentine's/birthday present and see how much things dry up. Money, presents, jewelry, etc...the currency may be different but the goal is the same.

IndividualFreedom said:

---

The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

Just think, pulling into the strip center just outside the neighborhood, walking into a once upon a time Subway, but now we are talking about the hypothetical footlong. There is a flat fee and anything over the time limit is added.

When it is too hot to fish, too hot for golf, and too cold at home....... Just saying it could save a marriage.

---

What an incredible rationalization that we're no better than our dogs.....sexually that is.

Quote:

---

IndividualFreedom said:
The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

Just think, pulling into the strip center just outside the neighborhood, walking into a once upon a time Subway, but now we are talking about the hypothetical footlong. There is a flat fee and anything over the time limit is added.

When it is too hot to fish, too hot for golf, and too cold at home....... Just saying it could save a marriage.

---

I'm not married, but that still sounds awesome! Which is probably why it should NEVER be legal. We need to be better men and the above would not help with that.

I heard an excellent point that if sex work is just work then bosses should be able to ask their underlings for a bj, it would be the same chore as asking for a cup coffee, or run this copy, or send this email. Ironically, I don't think feminists would like this idea.

hunter2012 said:

---

I heard an excellent point that if sex work is just work then bosses should be able to ask their underlings for a bj, it would be the same chore as asking for a cup coffee, or run this copy, or send this email. Ironically, I don't think feminists would like this idea.

---

Is this "excellent point" implying that the bj is for business, and not personal, to help morale, productivity, etc? Was this point made by your boss?

IndividualFreedom said:

---

The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

---

You've just described how things work in Europe, Asia, Australia and most of the rest of the world. Its just the US that makes a huge deal out of it for whatever reason.

We both know the reason. We can't tolerate sin. Unless of course it's sin we like then it's okay. We can tolerate that sin.

Keller6Ag91 said:

---

IndividualFreedom said:

---

The legal tug and rub in theory would save a lot of marriages from divorce. Since God made men to desire relations longer than married women by age, the legalization of the convenient release would help out those willing to look past the vow of marriage.

Just think, pulling into the strip center just outside the neighborhood, walking into a once upon a time Subway, but now we are talking about the hypothetical footlong. There is a flat fee and anything over the time limit is added.

When it is too hot to fish, too hot for golf, and too cold at home....... Just saying it could save a marriage.

---

What an incredible rationalization that we're no better than our dogs.....sexually that is.

---

just above you said men are broken

Quote:

---

Perhaps, but we as men drive the train here. Without demand from men, women wouldn't be forced to engage legally or illegally, victimized or not.

Unfortunately the brokenness of men will drive most of our major societal ills, from the breakdown of the family to abortion to paid sex.

---

so who exactly is the victim here?

Quote:

---

I'm not married, but that still sounds awesome! Which is probably why it should NEVER be legal. We need to be better men and the above would not help with that.

---

I never said, I would partake in the fictional storefront. I take my vows seriously. But for some fellas, the In and Out quick release joint could prevent a messy divorce after the 20 year marriage introduces the affair because the wife turned things off after the kids were born.

We certainly shouldn't be spending money for undercover agents trying to bust a horny pathetic dude for offering cash to a chick. Thry should be investigating why we have food plants being blown up or stopping 18 year old ******s from shooting kids in school.

It's not moral or responsible

But seriously, out of wedlock sex is as prevalent as ever. Once u take the sin aspect away, does anyone care?

They are capitalist
Someone mentioned near school and churches

You think you are going to buy a bj before you head into mass?

Well, now that you put it that way lol

They obvious are going to go to that area that customers want.

I do kind of wonder if wife's might start doing their womanly duty more frequently

IndividualFreedom said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm not married, but that still sounds awesome! Which is probably why it should NEVER be legal. We need to be better men and the above would not help with that.

---

I never said, I would partake in the fictional storefront. I take my vows seriously. But for some fellas, the In and Out quick release joint could prevent a messy divorce after the 20 year marriage introduces the affair because the wife turned things off after the kids were born.

---

If it helps to stabilize certain family structures and certain martial relationships why wouldn't there be support?
MDMA was used by counselors assisting married couples that were having relationship/sexual issues until the government stepped in.

There's isn't a one size fits all solution and maybe the government should try and remove itself from the decisions being made between consenting adults and couples within their marriage.

Daddy said:

---

You think you are going to buy a bj before you head into mass?

---

Maybe.

You seen how women dress at church nowadays?

Jmiller said:

---

hunter2012 said:

---

I heard an excellent point that if sex work is just work then bosses should be able to ask their underlings for a bj, it would be the same chore as asking for a cup coffee, or run this copy, or send this email. Ironically, I don't think feminists would like this idea.

---

Is this "excellent point" implying that the bj is for business, and not personal, to help morale, productivity, etc? Was this point made by your boss?

---

touche, but I heard it on a podcast. Should have sourced that to reassure ya that I didn't get Weinsteined