For the years 2011-2021 the average number of births is 63,911 for the Jan-Mar quarter, with a standard deviation of 1015

The drop to 54871 for 2022 is approx 9 SD.

9 Sigma. Unicorn events.

The money people understand this.@chrismartenson https://t.co/CFadqVIVkV pic.twitter.com/cm4Y4VytgD

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

For a 9 sigma drop in birth rates to have happened in Jan-Mar 2022, something dramatic had to have happened to stop pregnancies occurring in March to June 2021.

I wonder what that could be?
Were couples depressed? Looking to move house? Too busy?https://t.co/GJ8RlL8Z6B pic.twitter.com/VQT8tNRHe2

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

In the Children of Men, the midwives were the first to notice. The phone stopped ringing. But it only affected humans.

Nobody listened to the midwives. In today's equivalent we are not allowed to speak. Not allowed to raise concerns. https://t.co/2geQKJZvUb pic.twitter.com/7rdwdwILcG

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

Not just UK, not just Germany.
North Dakota provisional data showing another drop of 11% for Feb-April.

Unprecedented for a state that has a stable birth rate with SD<5% of mean
h/t @ichudov https://t.co/TgD396zowN pic.twitter.com/PLSAxBjNac

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

I dunno. Probably just a blip. Coincidence. What do I know, I'm just a mouse. @1979pop https://t.co/TwONkJh5Wx

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

Netherlands.... Same patternhttps://t.co/OSyEZ3EcAl

— Jikkyleaks (Fan account) 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) June 26, 2022

It is the same exact pattern in every single country and it lines up nearly exactly 9 months after the original vax rollout.that is, we didn't see any issues until women began conceiving after they got the vax. Women who got pregnant before the vax were unlikely to get the vax while pregnant so they didn't see any issues.

This is a big problem. If the trend continues down, we're looking at a global population collapse and women who did not get the vax will become immensely more valuable, same with men who did not get the vax.

Hello ladies.

Should've never joined the Aaschen confederation.

If true, this would be glorious. None of my family or our kids are vaxxed.

Since the liberals all got it, great news!

Hey! I don't really care. If you were stupid enough to get an experimental vaccine, that's your tough *****

The vaccine did effect menstrual cycles. Seems to be some smoke.

Pinche Guero said:

---

---

The 's' in sperm needs to be a '$'. Otherwise, well done

...and again...more evidence that this was a planned release of a bio-engineered virus as many of us have stated since the beginning of the COVID sham...

U.S. birth rate was up 1% in 2021. First increase in a long time. The vaccine causes super sperm!

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Hey! I don't really care. If you were stupid enough to get an experimental vaccine, that's your tough *****

---

Yeah, but population decline is bad for everyone. Think about having major population decline in the US. The infrastructure can't not be maintained because of labor issues. That means issues growing and delivering food, etc.

IDK, I think I'll use the same philosophy I did during Covid.

Forget the weatherman. Just look out the window and what do you see?

During Covid. I saw people going about their day and no bodies in the street. No need for mask, no need to hide, no need for vax.

Right now, I see lots of friends having babies, just like normal.

I suspect this is just fear porn of a different kind.

If you believe in the theory that the vax affects fertility, I saw another theory that the abortion decision is a piece of this whole plan.

If you are less fertile, you are less likely to get pregnant. If you are less likely to get pregnant, you are less likely to get an abortion. The SC decision allows them to say that the decline in abortion is due to the legal concerns and not the drop in fertility.

Marcus Brutus said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Hey! I don't really care. If you were stupid enough to get an experimental vaccine, that's your tough *****

---

Yeah, but population decline is bad for everyone. Think about having major population decline in the US. The infrastructure can't not be maintained because of labor issues. That means issues growing and delivering food, etc.

---

I recognize that. If this is true, it's gonna get awfully weird. If true., I don't look to a future of Amazon deliveries and a 40 hour work week. I'm headed to my place to watch it all burn.

Sometimes I wonder how people could have been so stupid to buy into this. But, then I recall the absolute fear campaign. It was nuts.

I speak with bravado and lack of care, but really I do care for my fellow man. It makes me sad. I have family relationships that were permanently destroyed by this covid idiocy.

hph6203 said:

---

U.S. birth rate was up 1% in 2021. First increase in a long time. The vaccine causes super sperm!

---

I see 0.09% increase over 2020, not 1%.

Quote:

---

It is the same exact pattern in every single country and it lines up nearly exactly 9 months after the original vax rollout

---

This is false, birth rates were static or slightly up in multiple nations where a large percentage of people were vaccinated.

But ultimately this is a clear issue of confounding

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/20220524.htm

hph6203 said:

---

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/20220524.htm

---

Quote:

---

The preterm birth rate rose 4% in 2021 to 10.48%the highest rate reported since at least 2007

---

Interesting.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Marcus Brutus said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Hey! I don't really care. If you were stupid enough to get an experimental vaccine, that's your tough *****

---

Yeah, but population decline is bad for everyone. Think about having major population decline in the US. The infrastructure can't not be maintained because of labor issues. That means issues growing and delivering food, etc.

---

I recognize that. If this is true, it's gonna get awfully weird. If true., I don't look to a future of Amazon deliveries and a 40 hour work week. I'm headed to my place to watch it all burn.

Sometimes I wonder how people could have been so stupid to buy into this. But, then I recall the absolute fear campaign. It was nuts.

I speak with bravado and lack of care, but really I do care for my fellow man. It makes me sad. I have family relationships that were permanently destroyed by this covid idiocy.

---

I don't understand it either. The data showed it was not needed for young, child bearing age folks. We had a years worth of data before the vax was available. It was a really bad decision for those people to take it .

Just to clarify, for the people that take that post seriously, it's heavy sarcasm. You cannot look at national level data this quickly and presume it is up to date with reality. It takes quite a while for medical data to matriculate from local data gathering sources to national level sources. Assuming that all births are represented in that data is a big assumption.

It's why the above report was released in May instead of February. Even at that the data does not represent 100% of births.

That is likely the case for every nation in the world. If May/June of next year you still see a dramatic and persistent drop in fertility you can start investigating why it has occurred.

It would be like saying COVID caused infertility at a high rate, when the reality is that lockdowns caused a drop in fertility in 2020.

An L of an Ag said:

---

Should've never joined the Aaschen confederation.

---

Stargate SG-1, too bad we cant warn the people in the past, but they would not listen anyway.

hph6203 said:

---

Just to clarify, for the people that take that post seriously, it's heavy sarcasm. You cannot look at national level data this quickly and presume it is up to date with reality. It takes quite a while for medical data to matriculate from local data gathering sources to national level sources. Assuming that all births are represented in that data is a big assumption.

It's why the above report was released in May instead of February. Even at that the data does not represent 100% of births.

That is likely the case for every nation in the world. If May/June of next year you still see a dramatic and persistent drop in fertility you can start investigating why it has occurred.

It would be like saying COVID caused infertility at a high rate, when the reality is that lockdowns caused a drop in fertility in 2020.

---

Well released Pfizer docs (they were forced to release) show it is bad for pregnant woman.

Ok, my stat was based on total population.

The 2021 stat would not be very useful imo since the vax was not available until 2021.

Always good to have a reminder that correlation = causation

Quote:

---

This is a big problem. If the trend continues down, we're looking at a global population collapse and women who did not get the vax will become immensely more valuable, same with men who did not get the vax.

---

My son be like,

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

Quote:

---

It is the same exact pattern in every single country and it lines up nearly exactly 9 months after the original vax rollout

---

This is false, birth rates were static or slightly up in multiple nations where a large percentage of people were vaccinated.

But ultimately this is a clear issue of confounding

---

Or an issue with the lot of vaccines administered in Germany.

So ur saying me and my sons' vaxx free sperm will be a premium, assuming there are some nonaffected females out there?

To be fair, a lot of people got pregnant during COVID lockdowns. I feel a drop-off should be expected, considering much of the childbearing population is curewntly sleep deprived from having children.

Its soft genocide.

Depopulation of the western world.

The carbon they plan to reduce is you.

Marcus Brutus said:

---

Ok, my stat was based on total population.

The 2021 stat would not be very useful imo since the vax was not available until 2021.

---

The point of the post is that 2021 spikes in births is as relevant as the information posted in the OP, because the data is likely not complete. 2021 spiked not because of a vaccine, but because 2020 broke trend on birth reductions (down 4% from 2019) and a lot of the intended parents that would have otherwise had children in 2020 pushed them in to 2021. I'm saying you can't take data without considering confounding variables. It was a joke.

When they posted COVID data to the CDC, there was a ~10-12+ week lag before you could reliably say the data was close enough to final to be used for analytics. The more rural, the longer the lag time.

I imagine the same is true for births. It is too early to say if births are down and too little information to say why, if they in fact are. You have to allow for the lag in data reporting to clear out before making any declarative statements.

People that got the vaccine and people that did not get the vaccine are both hunting for justifications for their decision and you end up with a ton of half real vomit posted on social media.

Births may be down in Germany more than the norm, but if this happened in the U.S. it could just as easily be described as a YoY reduction that aligns with the five year trend, because 2021 dramatically broke norms by being a YoY increase in births. Effectively, 2020 and 2021 swapped places in the trend line of births and 2022 may see a more dramatic drop than the norm coming off an out of the norm high for births.

Bill gates have a TeD talk were he talked about the population size being too big and one method to deal with it is vaccinations.

Marcus Brutus said:

---

hph6203 said:

---

U.S. birth rate was up 1% in 2021. First increase in a long time. The vaccine causes super sperm!

---

I see 0.09% increase over 2020, not 1%.

---

People love to make drive by posts like that

I'm not Vaxxed and had a kid in 2020 and 2021.