Biden's Roe speech

11,789 Views | 107 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Marcus Brutus
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…
No it isn't. They just cant get one in Texas.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden yesterday inferred there is no constitutional right to carry a gun. Today he says there is a constitutional right to abort a baby
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlackLab said:

Biden yesterday inferred there is no constitutional right to carry a gun. Today he says there is a constitutional right to abort a baby
This is a brain dead moron you are talking about. A moron who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution when he doesn't even know apparently whats in it.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.
Abortion also isn't a constitutional right
This, plus those women have zero capacity to go to another state?
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlackLab said:

Biden yesterday inferred there is no constitutional right to carry a gun. Today he says there is a constitutional right to abort a baby
That's the cognitive dissonance of the progressives.
The Dirty Sock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dirty Sock said:

"My fellow Americans, YOU face the CAMERA. Women's reproductive rights are an essential part of this country. YOU look down at YOUR notes. What the supreme court of the united states as appointed by an extremist administration has taken that away. YOU look up at the CAMERA. We well explore options to bring that control back to women. SAY Thank you. YOU turnaround and walk AWAY."


Drop page!

rsf0626
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?


Fine. Semantics. But yes those women who live in Texas no longer have that right
The Dirty Sock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was a privilege. Not a right.
92Ag95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.
A liberal lying? No fn' way!
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

aginlakeway said:

rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?


Fine. Semantics. But yes those women who live in Texas no longer have that right

What right do they no longer have?
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


When? What was the amendment?


https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3298540
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

aginlakeway said:

rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?


Fine. Semantics. But yes those women who live in Texas no longer have that right
It's not a right. I thought words matter?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

waitwhat? said:

So I guess no executive orders to circumvent it? That's a surprise.
Those lawsuits were already drafted and just awaiting the specifics of the EO to cut and paste into them.

Like when people with signs gathered to protest Kavanaugh's nomination before his selection was made public. Signs were basically fill in the blank on the name of the selection.

"I'm protesting!"

"Protesting what, exactly?"

"I haven't been told yet!"
Always reminds me of a story my buddy told me from years ago. He was watching the Houston news and there was a reporter covering Texas Southern students who were protesting.

Reporter: "Students here at Texas Southern aren't sure why they are protesting today but they are mad about it and aren't going to take it anymore."
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

aginlakeway said:

rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?


Fine. Semantics. But yes those women who live in Texas no longer have that right
Good thing they retain the right to choose with whom and how often they have sex and whether or not they want to use contraception.

Or are women incapable of managing themselves and making good choices and need a fail safe for when they **** up and don't want to accept responsibility for their behavior?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rsf0626 said:

aginlakeway said:

rsf0626 said:

Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.

For the women who live in Texas, it is gone…

What constitutional right is gone?


Fine. Semantics. But yes those women who live in Texas no longer have that right

Still waiting ... what right do they no longer have?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just now seeing this video. He looks to be in front of a green screen. And his mind just went through a complete cramp up. Holy crap he is mumbling and drooling.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

Giving credit to Trump. That's all he has.
FIFY
South Platte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it bad of me to look forward to watching idiots protest across the country? Starting fires, yelling at police barricades, seeing the dude in the wheelchair rolling out of a looted Spec's carrying a case of Budweiser?
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.
Uh, the Supreme Court just stated it is NOT a constitutional right.

thus, no constitutional rights were taken.

I'm old enough to remember when Joe Biden claimed NO constitutional right was absolute.

that was LAST WEEK.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dilettante said:

aTm2004 said:

Blaming Trump. That's all he has.
We all agree that this happened primarily because of Trump right? That doesn't seem heavily debated.

If you don't like it, it's blame. If you do like it, it's credit.

Uh... no.

it's because Cocaine Mitch blocked Merick Garland from the SCOTUS under Obama
and because we had a GOP majority Senate
Bobaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't fix LYING LIARS like FJB!
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

He's shorting out.
Shorting ?

That dude was an idiot going all the way back to '88. Nothing but a walking emptied husk
Rip*91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

Dilettante said:

aTm2004 said:

Blaming Trump. That's all he has.
We all agree that this happened primarily because of Trump right? That doesn't seem heavily debated.

If you don't like it, it's blame. If you do like it, it's credit.

Uh... no.

it's because Cocaine Mitch blocked Merick Garland from the SCOTUS under Obama
and because we had a GOP majority Senate
Truly one of the best things Cocaine Mitch ever ****ing did!!!
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Church ought to do something to him now, Step up and do Gods commands-- dont just leave it to Govt. Church, your hands are not tied. You can rock the boat too.
jejdag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't hear the speech…did he lean into the mic and whisper anything? …cuz that is SO powerful.
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fightingfarmer09 said:




Biden trying to act like he was a great legal mind, even at his intellectual peak.

And now the senile version of that same low-IQ blowhard is POTUS.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

Very first sentence is a complete lie, saying SCOTUS took away a constitutional right. It is not taken away, it is pushed to the states.


It never existed.
I wish a buck was still silver, it was back, when the country was strong.
92Ag95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Andrew Wilkow, a conservative talk show host on SXM 125, today posed an interesting hypothetical. How would the pro-choice left react if there were some way to tell in-utero if a baby was going to be gay and someone wanted to abort for that reason.

Would they be pro-choice or pro-gay?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTP02 said:

fightingfarmer09 said:




Biden trying to act like he was a great legal mind, even at his intellectual peak.

And now the senile version of that same low-IQ blowhard is POTUS.
I was pretty young, still a preteen, during the Watergate hearings. So I didn't get everything that was going on during the questioning.

Thomas confirmation hearings? Been a licensed lawyer for several years by then. Understood exactly what was happening and how truly awful those Senators were in formulating proper, incisive questions, not showing they knew what in the hell they were even talking about.

Agree with Thomas. Largely doofuses.
jetch17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just saw a replay of the speech on the local news and all you can see is the teleprompter moving off the reflection of the door behind him.

EskimoJoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TX04Aggie said:

his brain just broke...


Its been that way for a while now.
CyclingAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTP02 said:

fightingfarmer09 said:




Biden trying to act like he was a great legal mind, even at his intellectual peak.

And now the senile version of that same low-IQ blowhard is POTUS.
I think Biden's intellectual peak was the 9th grade.......
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dilettante said:

BQ78 said:

At least he isn't planning some unconstitutional executive order.
Biden has shown good restraint in resisting calls from his party to issue aggressive executive orders. It reminds me of Pence quite a bit. I'm not a huge fan of either but they both stood up for the integrity of the system.


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.