$100k is still a bargain.SB 43rd STREET OG said:
If I were ever to run for president, my biggest proposed policy would be a voluntary sterilization program that offers $2-3k to anyone under the age of 40 who wants to undergo irreversible sterilization.
...as long as we don't outsource our rearing to those lefties who have positioned themselves to groom out kids.bayareaag17 said:
There's going to be a conservative and religious revival. As a young guy, I see lots of these crazy, young, leftist women (you know the type, the blue hairs, the fatties, the weird tattoos and piercing type of people) are refusing to have children. Conservatives and Christians are averaging about .5 more children than their liberal counterparts. Give it time and the tides will start to shift back to a more traditional society.
SB 43rd STREET OG said:
If I were ever to run for president, my biggest proposed policy would be a voluntary sterilization program that offers $2-3k to anyone under the age of 40 who wants to undergo irreversible sterilization. We need to start thinking outside of the box (but must remain humane) if we are going to fix this country. Replace the would-be progeny with good honest hard working people from eastern europe and south of the border.
I would append that they also elect to never adopt. That part would never happen even if you could get the first part done. But, the last thing I would want is for these mentally damaged women to suddenly decide they need to ruin someone else's potentially adopted child.Marcus Brutus said:SB 43rd STREET OG said:
If I were ever to run for president, my biggest proposed policy would be a voluntary sterilization program that offers $2-3k to anyone under the age of 40 who wants to undergo irreversible sterilization. We need to start thinking outside of the box (but must remain humane) if we are going to fix this country. Replace the would-be progeny with good honest hard working people from eastern europe and south of the border.
Outstanding idea.
bayareaag17 said:
There's going to be a conservative and religious revival. As a young guy, I see lots of these crazy, young, leftist women (you know the type, the blue hairs, the fatties, the weird tattoos and piercing type of people) are refusing to have children. Conservatives and Christians are averaging about .5 more children than their liberal counterparts. Give it time and the tides will start to shift back to a more traditional society.
Understanding that math will lead you well down the road to understanding the border crisis.bayareaag17 said:
There's going to be a conservative and religious revival. As a young guy, I see lots of these crazy, young, leftist women (you know the type, the blue hairs, the fatties, the weird tattoos and piercing type of people) are refusing to have children. Conservatives and Christians are averaging about .5 more children than their liberal counterparts. Give it time and the tides will start to shift back to a more traditional society.
Not if Cornyn give amnesty to 30 million people.bayareaag17 said:
There's going to be a conservative and religious revival. As a young guy, I see lots of these crazy, young, leftist women (you know the type, the blue hairs, the fatties, the weird tattoos and piercing type of people) are refusing to have children. Conservatives and Christians are averaging about .5 more children than their liberal counterparts. Give it time and the tides will start to shift back to a more traditional society.
Maroon Dawn said:
bayareaag17 said:
There's going to be a conservative and religious revival. As a young guy, I see lots of these crazy, young, leftist women (you know the type, the blue hairs, the fatties, the weird tattoos and piercing type of people) are refusing to have children. Conservatives and Christians are averaging about .5 more children than their liberal counterparts. Give it time and the tides will start to shift back to a more traditional society.
The amount of white liberals who do selfless things like adopt is negligible. But I agree. Just not so worried about them turning to adoption.American Hardwood said:I would append that they also elect to never adopt. That part would never happen even if you could get the first part done. But, the last thing I would want is for these mentally damaged women to suddenly decide they need to ruin someone else's potentially adopted child.Marcus Brutus said:SB 43rd STREET OG said:
If I were ever to run for president, my biggest proposed policy would be a voluntary sterilization program that offers $2-3k to anyone under the age of 40 who wants to undergo irreversible sterilization. We need to start thinking outside of the box (but must remain humane) if we are going to fix this country. Replace the would-be progeny with good honest hard working people from eastern europe and south of the border.
Outstanding idea.
(edit for grammar)
Good points, can't argue.American Hardwood said:
Under normal conditions, I would agree. But if you end up with a bunch of libs sterilizing themselves when they are young, many of them might decide later that corrupting an adopted child is appealing. Especially, if that means taking the opportunity away from a loving, presumably right wing couple. I can totally see a campaign crafted on this basis. There is still the math problem of the left being outbred by the right if they aren't having kids.
ETA: If they are willing to murder babies and sterilize themselves for the sake of their death cult religion, do you really think it is beneath them to steal babies via adoption?