There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

"This isn't an official platform of the democrats so it doesn't count!"

/a certain poster

GET THE **** AWAY FROM KIDS, YOU PEDOS!!

They can't help themselves.
This movement is their religion

That person is very falcon-punchable

"But there is no grooming going on, not a bit."

When will people learn that TikTok is literally a Chinese operation to tear apart our society. Basically force feeding these lunatics to our kids.

Groomers gonna groom

Resident libs never show up here. They just ignore it.

This is clearly a Trump staffer trying to make the LGB+ crowd look bad. How can you not see this?/ Sarcasm

Edit: These people are sick and anybody supporting this crap has more than a few screws loose.

As long as professional gays allow the 'kink' society speak for them, they will all get grouped together. Until then, 'pride' is nothing more than a bunch of deviants running amuck.

The number of well placed, sicko, twisted groomers in the media is sickening.

I hope these idiots that vomit their ideas on indoctrination all over social media get fired in due course.

Rapier108 said:

---

"But there is no grooming going on, not a bit."

---

Be careful. Don't name any certain posters or you'll get a staff warning.

These are sick, twisted, satanic people.

What is "kink"? I'm somewhat afraid to google it now.

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

"This isn't an official platform of the democrats so it doesn't count!"

/a certain poster

---

Talk about out of context. Why not say what you really think by the way, this veiled vague commentary is so lame.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

lmao. figures.

The context isn't statistical.

The context is the proximity of children and their fragile and undeveloped minds to an overtly sexual concept; and further that sexual concept tied to a social justice narrative.

Based on that context, it is predatory AF.

Still waiting for the definition of being "ok" with any of this is.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Frederick Palowaski said:

---

"This isn't an official platform of the democrats so it doesn't count!"

/a certain poster

---

Talk about out of context. Why not say what you really think by the way, this veiled vague commentary is so lame.

---

That's how one gets flagged and banned, but you knew that already and nobody is taking your ban bait.

fixer said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

lmao. figures.

The context isn't statistical.

The context is the proximity of children and their fragile and undeveloped minds to an overtly sexual concept; and further that sexual concept tied to a social justice narrative.

Based on that context, it is predatory AF.

Still waiting for the definition of being "ok" with any of this is.

---

Let's put the Uvalde shooter "in context" and not burn down the constitution because of some fringe whacko. Both sides have their arguments and both think they are equally valid.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

I'm trying to decide what I think about this. On the one hand, it's true that it's wrong to define a group of people by their fringe members, which is why it's always been bull**** that Trump voters have been labeled racist. On the other hand, sometimes the fringe of a group merely says out loud what the intellectual commitments of the group entail, even if the center of the group doesn't yet recognize that their central commitments entail the ends they do.

For example, the views that race is a real category, that it is fundamental to our identity, and that white people are inferior to other races is entailed by critical theory, and this is true even though most defenders of critical theory have good motivations and don't yet see that their views are inherently racist.

Maybe this will help clarify.

If the group has a stated and written down ethos (doctrine, mission, purpose, etc) are the fringe adherents following said ethos or are they out of line. This is what separates Christian extremist vs Muslim extremist. One is acting within the works of their doctrine the other isn't. Also anything BLM would support the "fringe".

If the group doesn't have a written and formal ethos then the fringe elements could one day just become the elements. While it is technically in limbo, when it comes to "progressive" ideology always expect the most progressive (radical) idea to eventually win out. This is more the case with LGBT.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

The (D)ifference is your fringe wackos are pedos pushing grooming on largely scaled media channels and are not immediately de-platformed.

For one, I can't think of an equivalently vile movement on the right. And, two, if there is one I'm pretty sure it's getting de-platformed, immediately.

This person is crazy, but keep in mind that there are extremist outliers in any grouping and they don't necessarily have undue influence on the groups they are a part of. At least, they didn't before social media and Intersectionality launched a competition on the left to virtue signal for the most oppressed identifiable intersectional groupings that one could find. That competitive virtue signaling amongst a relatively large group of activists with these platforms that give the impression that their numbers are greater than they really are gives them much more influence than they actually really warrant, out of the intimidation of being targeted for harassment for being insufficiently allied to their causes.

fixer said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

lmao. figures.

The context isn't statistical.

The context is the proximity of children and their fragile and undeveloped minds to an overtly sexual concept; and further that sexual concept tied to a social justice narrative.

Based on that context, it is predatory AF.

Still waiting for the definition of being "ok" with any of this is.

---

Ok.......TXAGFAN........ I see your argument. Perhaps this person is a "fringe" member.

But here's what is important-- this person is much like Oz behind the curtain. She develops content for Nickalodian.
Now, I think we can both agree that while her public "persona" on toc tock may not be that popular, her broadcast network and her reach is VERY influential.

Fair?

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

You completely and conveniently ignored op's one statement on the clip...one that any reasonable person would say is pretty significant.

Pride Month has become SICK

The only benefit is a lot have been empowered to expose themselves in regards to their agenda.

Can we just "identify" her as ugly, in and out

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

I would say this is a good case for…it's not enough to not be a groomer. You should be anti-groomer. And this thing that produces content FOR KIDS is actively grooming.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

My party didn't strongarm my employer to fly a pro-gun ownership flag right next to the American flag for the entire month. If you wanna be gay, or think you were born gay, and want to work with me, sign contracts, have freedom of speech, etc., no problem. But if you think for one minute that I should celebrate that Skittle-flag, you can shove it. Nobody holds a parade to celebrate what I do with my private parts after work hours, and I'm not holding one for anybody else.

94chem said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

My party didn't strongarm my employer to fly a pro-gun ownership flag right next to the American flag for the entire month. If you wanna be gay, or think you were born gay, and want to work with me, sign contracts, have freedom of speech, etc., no problem. But if you think for one minute that I should celebrate that Skittle-flag, you can shove it. Nobody holds a parade to celebrate what I do with my private parts after work hours, and I'm not holding one for anybody else.

---

Where did I post any of that?

Clob94 said:

---

fixer said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

lmao. figures.

The context isn't statistical.

The context is the proximity of children and their fragile and undeveloped minds to an overtly sexual concept; and further that sexual concept tied to a social justice narrative.

Based on that context, it is predatory AF.

Still waiting for the definition of being "ok" with any of this is.

---

Ok.......TXAGFAN........ I see your argument. Perhaps this person is a "fringe" member.

But here's what is important-- this person is much like Oz behind the curtain. She develops content for Nickalodian.
Now, I think we can both agree that while her public "persona" on toc tock may not be that popular, her broadcast network and her reach is VERY influential.

Fair?

---

Sure.

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

She works for Nickelodeon dude, she has way more influence than just a Twitter account.

And no this isn't a fringe wacko, this is the norm on the left. No one believes these people don't represent everyone anymore, not with by the push for drag queens everywhere and trans kids continuously. The idea that this is a fringe belief is nothing but gaslighting.

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

I would say this is a good case for…it's not enough to not be a groomer. You should be anti-groomer. And this thing that produces content FOR KIDS is actively grooming.

---

Love it! "If you're not actively 'anti groomer', you're a groomer!" Where have we heard this before?

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

TXAGFAN said:

---

Dacoldest said:

---

There should be kink at pride for kids. Kink and kids should coexist with eachother. pic.twitter.com/oQGaAMjpdw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2022

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lindsay-amer

And this he-she produces content for Nickelodean...protect your kids.

---

This person is an idiot, but let's put them in context. They have 733 followers on Tiktok and this video, even after a day on Libs of Tiktok, has 1k views. If this mentality was as widespread as you all want to believe it would have hundreds of thousands of views and they'd have tens of thousands of followers. This is a fringe wacko.

You guys don't have ANY of those in your party? Religion? Of course you do.

---

She works for Nickelodeon dude, she has way more influence than just a Twitter account.

And no this isn't a fringe wacko, this is the norm on the left. No one believes these people don't represent everyone anymore, not with by the push for drag queens everywhere and trans kids continuously. The idea that this is a fringe belief is nothing but gaslighting.

---

Not the norm, just the norm you made up in your head from seeing some people highlighted on social media. Work on your critical thinking.