I could of predicted this.

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

I guess using Portugal as the example didn't work out like they thought.

Unexpectedly…

Marcus Brutus said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

No. I'm not spending a single dime of taxpayer money helping people get high the "right way".

---

So if you could avoid the crime to get the drugs, this would not make you happy?

Quote:

---

In November 2020, voters overwhelmingly passed Measure 110. The Drug Addiction Treatment and Recovery Act secured 58% of the votes and decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs such as heroin, meth, cocaine and fentanyl.

---

Wow, that was brilliant.

How in the world do you do this with any of these especially fentanyl which we know China is pushing on us to destroy us.

Democrats are f'ing stupid. And water is wet.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Marcus Brutus said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

No. I'm not spending a single dime of taxpayer money helping people get high the "right way".

---

So if you could avoid the crime to get the drugs, this would not make you happy?

---

Where does it say crime has gone up? This is about overdosing, not crime.

DallasAg 94 said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

So... we should provide a safe environment for women to be raped in hopes we can control them not getting pregnant?!

I think this is where I insert <Username checks out>

---

You're comparing the assault and rape of a woman with drug addiction. I'm sure this analogy sounded well in your head's Trump voice, but come on. (I woulda left it alone with the first sentence response, but you simply couldn't help yourself, huh?)

Good. Less worthless libs in the country. Hopefully the trend will continue

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

So are you advocating for 'drive-thru' needle jabs with clean needles and Narcan ?
A place druggies can go to 'safely' take mind altering and extremely addictive drugs?

You think legalizing hard drugs 'safely' will lead to less addiction and crime?

I don't understand your position I guess...

CM Trump Voter said:

---

Marcus Brutus said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

No. I'm not spending a single dime of taxpayer money helping people get high the "right way".

---

So if you could avoid the crime to get the drugs, this would not make you happy?

---

This theory has been proven to not work though.

We've already shown that in this thread: https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3296617/replies/62302499

And we've tried the war on drugs for40 years. All it has done is criminalize addiction

Tea Party said:

---

Darwin winners.

---

Exactly. If we could somehow limit it to 21 and over, then it is just self-cleanup of a broken society.

I hate that fact that kids who should know better, but maybe don't actually are dying as collateral damage from adults who should know better.

Anyone over 21 that dies from it, it is sad, but that is their choice.

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So whats this mean, does uncle sam via the tax payer finance these addictions by cutting checks to the dealers and cartels?

We should do the opposite. Announce and widely publicize that the government is going to poison the drug supply.

Narcotic units should use informants to distribute the poisoned drugs on the street.

Addicts have two choices, kick or die.

This is the only way to make a serious dent in American drug use or addiction.











Or just keep it criminalized and accept that it is a losing battle but you do what you can do. Legalization is idiotic and will be a massive drain on public resources that is a no go. We should never subsidize degeneracy.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So these clinics would be giving away free drugs?

YouBet said:

---

Quote:

---

In November 2020, voters overwhelmingly passed Measure 110. The Drug Addiction Treatment and Recovery Act secured 58% of the votes and decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs such as heroin, meth, cocaine and fentanyl.

---

Wow, that was brilliant.

How in the world do you do this with any of these especially fentanyl which we know China is pushing on us to destroy us.

Democrats are f'ing stupid. And water is wet.

---

Y. Fentanyl belongs only in a hospital or hospice setting

CM Trump Voter said:

---

And we've tried the war on drugs for40 years. All it has done is criminalize addiction

---

Marihuana aside because I have zero issues with that being legal...making hard drugs legal hasn't worked either.

I would rather have these folks institutionalized or in jail than have them in public ****ting in the streets and burglarizing responsible citizens day in and day out.

I don't see how your position is tenable.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So who is the supplier, who is the distributor, who pays, and how does one become a customer?

This is such fantasyland stuff

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

Wow. Are the drugs free of charge and provided or they have a co-pay?

The plan is a 'safer' way to get high?



I would rather remove them from society with a 3 strikes policy.

SupaManu said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So whats this mean, does uncle sam via the tax payer finance these addictions by cutting checks to the dealers and cartels?

---

The alternative is spending money to incarcerate them and spending money on their welfare while addicted. The idea is to offer a safe clinic to acquire enough to stave off the drive to commit crimes and to engage in prostitution. I don't see why this is so terrible fo abides except that people apply a "moral" element to addiction.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

Good God liberals are stupid.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

SupaManu said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So whats this mean, does uncle sam via the tax payer finance these addictions by cutting checks to the dealers and cartels?

---

The alternative is spending money to incarcerate them and spending money on their welfare while addicted. The idea is to offer a safe clinic to acquire enough to stave off the drive to commit crimes and to engage in prostitution. I don't see why this is so terrible fo abides except that people apply a "moral" element to addiction.

---

Lol, did you take any economic classes? Do you have any idea what happens when you give stuff away for "free".

CM Trump Voter said:

---

SupaManu said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So whats this mean, does uncle sam via the tax payer finance these addictions by cutting checks to the dealers and cartels?

---

The alternative is spending money to incarcerate them and spending money on their welfare while addicted. The idea is to offer a safe clinic to acquire enough to stave off the drive to commit crimes and to engage in prostitution. I don't see why this is so terrible fo abides except that people apply a "moral" element to addiction.

---

Half your username definitely fits.

CM Trump Voter said:

---

SupaManu said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

I wouldn't say "drive thru", but yes a place where addicts can get their fix without breaking into homes or engaging in prostitution. I don't support drug use, but I'm trying to think of a solution.

---

So whats this mean, does uncle sam via the tax payer finance these addictions by cutting checks to the dealers and cartels?

---

The alternative is spending money to incarcerate them and spending money on their welfare while addicted. The idea is to offer a safe clinic to acquire enough to stave off the drive to commit crimes and to engage in prostitution. I don't see why this is so terrible fo abides except that people apply a "moral" element to addiction.

---

Then lets start crucifying them again like the Romans did. What else?

Hungry Ojos said:

---

CM Trump Voter said:

---

The correct approach doesn't just legalize these hard drugs, it provides controlled access with the goal of harm reduction. Try to do it safely with hopes of reducing addiction, harm and the crime.

---

Good God liberals are stupid.

---

Just because it doesn't fit with ur "muh pappy told me mindset" doesn't mean it's liberal. I'm not liberal unless you ascribe to the word stolen by leftism.

….and yet if you just gave those folks what they want. Really pure and power stuff for free and let them OD is a safe environment…..you would be called a beast.