American Hardwood said:
BAP Enthusiast said:
B-1 83 said:
redcrayon said:
utah, get me two said:
Southern Baptists and evangelicals are weird. Their concert churches are blasphemous and show how little attention they can devote to faith without making it a spectacle
Catholic mass is also a spectacle, just a different kind than the Baptists.
And there it is! It took a little time, but F16 lived up to its reputation. Well done, and thanks for carrying the torch.
I don't disparage Catholic mass but you are expecting a double standard. You have no issues with someone calling a Baptist church heretical yet you whine like a child when someone says the same of Catholicism. You clearly have thin skin and need to learn to handle criticism of your faith without throwing a tantrum. In other words, you need to read more of Paul's letters to learn how to deal with criticism.
My faith with Jesus is between him and me alone. Why should I care what others think about my church when it does not affect my own beliefs? I try to remain steadfast in the face of it all and turn my attention to what is actually important. None of what is posted here is important and it never will be important. Paul spoke of these things often.
First I must say that I would never question the righteous Protestant is not genuine in his faith. That is not for me to judge, Protestants and Catholics have the same access to the Truth in scripture.
The question I have regarding the bolded above is how do you know you have been educated properly in your faith if it relies so heavily on self determination? If every protestant church is an island unto itself, there is a high risk that each church will teach a different doctrine, a different faith to some degree or other. I find it very strange when my protestant friends 'shop' for different churches to find one they like or a pastor that is more agreeable to them. That sounds like prime grounds for the introduction of heresy.
The Catholic Church structure was largely formed in the early centuries as a means to counter against heresy and is still it's main responsibility along with teaching. Heresy in the early days was a significant problem. Just yesterday the readings at Mass addressed this in fact. Acts 15:1-2, 22-29.
I would like to know how the Protestant faith guards itself against heresy if there is no central authority and inconsistent preaching. Serious question.
If you rely on humans or human creations to support your faith then it will always be fragile. I put my trust into Jesus, not into earthly things. Oh sure I am smart and I work hard and am physically fit, but none of what I really do matters all that much. God has a plan for me and If his plan is for me to suffer in my faith then so be it.
Heresy I believe is now readily obvious and out in the open. All LGBTQ and woke ideology is heretical to all of Christianity. Nothing about any of it is biblical. Abortion is heresy. Supporting adultery is heresy.
Yes interpreting the Bible can be difficult but the above are easy to recognize in the world. Paul speaks of living in the culture and dealing with it but not being "of the culture" in his letters often. The above things are all of the culture and are not remotely based on anything from the Bible. This is obviously Sarah's influence.
It used to be much harder to see heresy but I don't believe this is the case anymore. Satan is working openly and everything is all out in the public for everyone to see. Differences in dogma or doctrine really don't matter when it comes to the above issues because they are so incredibly minor.