Finland applying for NATO membership

5,450 Views | 86 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by nortex97
Post removed:
by user
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like Putin is trying to de-escalate in Ukraine and cut losses, odds he'd actually referees course at this point? A sane Putin wouldn't, but I guess we will see…
TxAgswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nightmare scenario.

Pick up a book, Finland.

Helsinki is the model for resolution. Ukraine should be a non-NATO, EU country, just like Finland. At a bare minimum. If Finland joins NATO, the hinges come off in Eastern Europe.

Pride means nothing if you poke an insane bear with 3,000 nuclear warheads.
"A house divided cannot stand"

Abraham Lincoln
My Name Is Judge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do I get the feeling our numb nuts cornpop admin prodded this & that we'll soon be sending middle class tax dollars to Finland ?
Anubus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just great. Another NATO country that won't be pulling their own weight.
Aggie4Life02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just give them our spot.
spider96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChemEAg08 said:

Seems like Putin is trying to de-escalate in Ukraine and cut losses, odds he'd actually referees course at this point? A sane Putin wouldn't, but I guess we will see…


Hopefully, Zelensky finally throws the red flag on the field and stops this game. Mariupol is about to fall. That way the replay official can have time to sift through the propaganda and determine once and for all whether Putin's invasion is justified. The referees myopia up to this point has been horrifying.
RogerEnright
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I promise you that Russia's apatite for conquest will not be satiated. Their history is decently linear.

Why shouldn't Finland try to protect itself?
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just not Greenland. We're buying that one in 2025.
RogerEnright
How long do you want to ignore this user?
its another boarder that Russia has to respect. that enables Finland to punch above their "useful" weight
K2-HMFIC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In this thread, people who know jack about Finlands history (See Russo-Finnish War) decide to make their opinion known.
Krazykat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bring on WW3!
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just want to see some Finnish snipers in action.
RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Turkey says "not so fast"?

rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RebelE Infantry said:

Turkey says "not so fast"?




They only 2/3 approval from existing members correct? Turkey seems to be unpredictable with their motives.
TacosaurusRex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChemEAg08 said:

Seems like Putin is trying to de-escalate in Ukraine and cut losses, odds he'd actually referees course at this point? A sane Putin wouldn't, but I guess we will see…


Bombing cities and still invading another country seems like a really weird way to de-escalte.
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anubus said:

Just great. Another NATO country that won't be pulling their own weight.


Whether this join-up is smart or not, the Finns have proven themselves to be an upright, brave people. If there are conditions & commitments to their membership, I think you can expect Finland will honor them.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RebelE Infantry said:

Turkey says "not so fast"?


Who ever imagined Erdogan would be the grown up in the room.
RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rathAG05 said:

RebelE Infantry said:

Turkey says "not so fast"?




They only 2/3 approval from existing members correct? Turkey seems to be unpredictable with their motives.


For some reason I thought it had to be unanimous, but now I'm not so sure. Perhaps you're correct.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlargement_of_NATO#Criteria_and_process

Quote:

The North Atlantic Treaty is the basis of the organization, and, as such, any changes including new membership requires ratification by all current signers of the treaty. The treaty's Article 10 describes how non-member states may join NATO:

The Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty.
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Life02 said:

Just give them our spot.


FarmerJohn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sweden is the big "get". Almost the population of Norway and Finland combined. They also have an actual arms industry. Considering their history of continuing to supply arms to warring powers under their flag of neutrality, it would be nice to have them in the alliance to put the brakes on that. Russia is their top export market. If they aren't in NATO when this is all over, they are absolutely going to get paid to fix the Russian mess.

Finland and Sweden should be a package deal.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wbt5845 said:

RebelE Infantry said:

Turkey says "not so fast"?


Who ever imagined Erdogan would be the grown up in the room.
Yeah, he's the grown up.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
medwriter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have spent time in Oulu and Helsinki as an employee of Nokia about 20 years ago during Nokia's heyday. This is a bold move by Finland. Russia is headed down. I only hope that Russia isn't so desperate to launch nukes.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Putin and Russian leadership are irrational. What did he expect would happen when he invaded Ukraine? NATO never has and never will be an offensive pact, despite Putin's claims. His actions have only provided reason for Finland and Sweden to join and proven the continued need for NATO.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great. Add a few more euro or near east countries and then the USA can exit.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Makes sense; so near to Russia Finland, Finland, Finland.
flakrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RebelE Infantry said:

rathAG05 said:

RebelE Infantry said:

Turkey says "not so fast"?




They only 2/3 approval from existing members correct? Turkey seems to be unpredictable with their motives.


For some reason I thought it had to be unanimous, but now I'm not so sure. Perhaps you're correct.
That's what we thought regarding SEC expansion.
Ernest Tucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the same Finland that our congressional representatives for religious freedom had to call out for persecution against Christians?

"In 2019, Dr. Rsnen, a practicing Lutheran, tweeted in response to her denomination's support for an LGBT pride event. Her tweet asked how a church could affirm homosexuality and still be consistent with the Bible, including a link to Romans 1:24-27. In 2004, Dr. Rsnen authored a pamphlet making the case for a traditional definition of marriage that was published by Lutheran bishop Reverend Dr. Juhana Pohjola. Finland's Prosecutor General, after repeatedly interrogating Dr. Rsnen, formally charged her with three charges of incitement against ethnic groups in April 2021."

Yeah, no thanks
RebelE Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oof
Jbob04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We might as well go ahead and send them a few billion bucks. Hell we send everyone else money
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nuclear war threats are coming more frequently from Russia. This one is a "...full-fledged nuclear war" threat.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1609976/russia-nuclear-war-nato-putin-finland-dmitry-medvedev
Quote:

Russia threatens 'full-scale nuclear war' as Putin furious with NATO
A TOP Russian official has warned that NATO has sparked outrage by helping Ukraine, which could trigger a "full-fledged nuclear war".
By JACOB PAUL 15:51, Fri, May 13, 2022 | UPDATED: 15:52, Fri, May 13, 2022

NATO has stood firm in its support for Ukraine ever since Russia launched its brutal invasion back in mid-February. Members of the military alliance have shipped thousands of weapons to help the Ukrainian army in battle. And in April, NATO agreed to supply new types of advanced weaponry to the country to prepare for the siege Russian offensive in eastern Ukraine.

Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev said this NATO support will make a direct conflict between the alliance and Moscow more likely.

He also warned that this could even result in a full-blown nuclear war.

Mr Medvedev said: "First, the pumping of Ukraine by NATO countries with weapons, the training of its troops to use Western equipment, the dispatch of mercenaries, and the conduct of exercises by the countries of the Alliance near our borders increase the likelihood of a direct and open conflict between NATO and Russia instead of their 'war by proxy'.

"Second, such a conflict always has the risk of turning into a full-fledged nuclear war....

...
I voted for this because I like Mean Tweets!
Demosthenes81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ernest Tucker said:

Is this the same Finland that our congressional representatives for religious freedom had to call out for persecution against Christians?

"In 2019, Dr. Rsnen, a practicing Lutheran, tweeted in response to her denomination's support for an LGBT pride event. Her tweet asked how a church could affirm homosexuality and still be consistent with the Bible, including a link to Romans 1:24-27. In 2004, Dr. Rsnen authored a pamphlet making the case for a traditional definition of marriage that was published by Lutheran bishop Reverend Dr. Juhana Pohjola. Finland's Prosecutor General, after repeatedly interrogating Dr. Rsnen, formally charged her with three charges of incitement against ethnic groups in April 2021."

Yeah, no thanks
All charges dropped

https://www.foxnews.com/world/case-dismissed-finnish-mp-bishop-in-free-speech-religious-liberty-trial
Seven and three are ten, not only now, but forever. There has never been a time when seven and three were not ten, nor will there ever be a time when they are not ten. Therefore, I have said that the truth of number is incorruptible and common to all who think. — St. Augustine
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WolfCall said:

Nuclear war threats are coming more frequently from Russia. This one is a "...full-fledged nuclear war" threat.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1609976/russia-nuclear-war-nato-putin-finland-dmitry-medvedev
Quote:

Russia threatens 'full-scale nuclear war' as Putin furious with NATO
A TOP Russian official has warned that NATO has sparked outrage by helping Ukraine, which could trigger a "full-fledged nuclear war".
By JACOB PAUL 15:51, Fri, May 13, 2022 | UPDATED: 15:52, Fri, May 13, 2022

NATO has stood firm in its support for Ukraine ever since Russia launched its brutal invasion back in mid-February. Members of the military alliance have shipped thousands of weapons to help the Ukrainian army in battle. And in April, NATO agreed to supply new types of advanced weaponry to the country to prepare for the siege Russian offensive in eastern Ukraine.

Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev said this NATO support will make a direct conflict between the alliance and Moscow more likely.

He also warned that this could even result in a full-blown nuclear war.

Mr Medvedev said: "First, the pumping of Ukraine by NATO countries with weapons, the training of its troops to use Western equipment, the dispatch of mercenaries, and the conduct of exercises by the countries of the Alliance near our borders increase the likelihood of a direct and open conflict between NATO and Russia instead of their 'war by proxy'.

"Second, such a conflict always has the risk of turning into a full-fledged nuclear war....

...


aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RogerEnright said:

I promise you that Russia's apatite for conquest will not be satiated. Their history is decently linear.

Why shouldn't Finland try to protect itself?
This isn't 1950. Russia is a freaking disaster in every conceivable way that is imploding. In no way, shape, or form can they project power beyond countries that border them and that's questionable and very limited. They simply don't have the money, manpower, or equipment and that isn't going to change for the next 30-50 years. If you don't understand that you simply don't know much about Russia. Hell they couldn't even send a line of tanks into Ukraine on a flat road that wasn't being attacked by the air, they just ran out of gas and stopped. Their planes that are being shot down have GPS taped to them because the tech inside doesn't work.

Our only real threat from Russia is nuclear and the only way they go nuclear is if we make them feel as though we are seeking regime change and/or they feel like we are going to attack and they can't win conventionally (which they now know for certain they can't). So just walk away and watch them die on the vine.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.