CDub06 said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

No I was not. Started off just desiring something other than a silly cartoonish song. This was before I actually googled the lyrics. Once that happened...it had to go.

I'm serious. Nobody seems to have an answer as to whether the song and its acceptance is woke, anti-woke, naive, ignorant?

OK, you're up...or anyone else perhaps?

---

Your obsession with this song is so odd. They don't even play the lyrics you object to.

Playing that song is neither woke or anti-woke...whatever that means. It's a pump up song. You should hear what's on my running playlist.

---

So let me get this straight..you think its appropriate for TAMU to align itself with a song with lyrics which are profane (use of MF bombs) and racial slurs. I'm not sure what woke means either. Hoping someone that does will jump on here. My guess is your playlist contains much of the same type of garbage? I think I'll pass..

What would be so difficult about sourcing a non racist/profane song and putting this one our to pasture? Thats the goal..is that really so odd?

McKelveysCurse said:

---

CDub06 said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

No I was not. Started off just desiring something other than a silly cartoonish song. This was before I actually googled the lyrics. Once that happened...it had to go.

I'm serious. Nobody seems to have an answer as to whether the song and its acceptance is woke, anti-woke, naive, ignorant?

OK, you're up...or anyone else perhaps?

---

Your obsession with this song is so odd. They don't even play the lyrics you object to.

Playing that song is neither woke or anti-woke...whatever that means. It's a pump up song. You should hear what's on my running playlist.

---

So let me get this straight..you think its appropriate for TAMU to align itself with a song with lyrics which are profane (use of MF bombs) and racial slurs. I'm not sure what woke means either. Hoping someone that does will jump on here. My guess is your playlist contains much of the same type of garbage? I think I'll pass..

What would be so difficult about sourcing a non racist/profane song and putting this one our to pasture? Thats the goal..is that really so odd?

---

Article from 2012 A&M adds energy to players' game entrance

What version of the song do you listen to?

McKelveysCurse said:

---

CDub06 said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

No I was not. Started off just desiring something other than a silly cartoonish song. This was before I actually googled the lyrics. Once that happened...it had to go.

I'm serious. Nobody seems to have an answer as to whether the song and its acceptance is woke, anti-woke, naive, ignorant?

OK, you're up...or anyone else perhaps?

---

Your obsession with this song is so odd. They don't even play the lyrics you object to.

Playing that song is neither woke or anti-woke...whatever that means. It's a pump up song. You should hear what's on my running playlist.

---

So let me get this straight..you think its appropriate for TAMU to align itself with a song with lyrics which are profane (use of MF bombs) and racial slurs. I'm not sure what woke means either. Hoping someone that does will jump on here. My guess is your playlist contains much of the same type of garbage? I think I'll pass..

What would be so difficult about sourcing a non racist/profane song and putting this one our to pasture? Thats the goal..is that really so odd?

---

Once again, the version they play contains none of the stuff that you are offended by. In fact, based on what you said earlier, you had to actively seek out the explicit version's lyrics. You literally went looking for something to be offended by. What does that say about you?

CDub06 said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

CDub06 said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

No I was not. Started off just desiring something other than a silly cartoonish song. This was before I actually googled the lyrics. Once that happened...it had to go.

I'm serious. Nobody seems to have an answer as to whether the song and its acceptance is woke, anti-woke, naive, ignorant?

OK, you're up...or anyone else perhaps?

---

Your obsession with this song is so odd. They don't even play the lyrics you object to.

Playing that song is neither woke or anti-woke...whatever that means. It's a pump up song. You should hear what's on my running playlist.

---

So let me get this straight..you think its appropriate for TAMU to align itself with a song with lyrics which are profane (use of MF bombs) and racial slurs. I'm not sure what woke means either. Hoping someone that does will jump on here. My guess is your playlist contains much of the same type of garbage? I think I'll pass..

What would be so difficult about sourcing a non racist/profane song and putting this one our to pasture? Thats the goal..is that really so odd?

---

Once again, the version they play contains none of the stuff that you are offended by. In fact, based on what you said earlier, you had to actively seek out the explicit version's lyrics. You literally went looking for something to be offended by. What does that say about you?

---

Honestly, wasn't aware that there was an alternate version. A simple google search revealed the lyrics. Trust me, I did not seek out the other version. Just being honest here. I do wonder since only 10 seconds or so of the song are played...which version is being played? How do we know? Again, which core value led to its selection? I suppose an audible "disclaimer" could be played just prior to the song informing us? Why was a non-explicit version even created? Thanks for clearing things up. Things have really gotten fascinating now. I still maintain we need a new entrance song. TAMU should distance itself from the NON explicit version which is clearly tied to the racist, profane one. Nothing wrong with upgrading the song to something better as this one, whether is a different version, is pretty weak with little power. Crazy that some would want to promote this. I won't pretend to guess what this says about you. We've never met.

The goal remains the same; the vision firm. Racism has no home at TEXAS A&M.

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

It's pandering to the woke, so it is woke.

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Old McDonald said:

---

my nephew is an engineering student at A&M, he sent my brother a screenshot of a question from his calculus homework:

"the speed of a moving train follows the function f(t) = 3t^2, calculate the function representing the acceleration of the train if the conductor has an unconscious bias against black people"

truly dark times we're living in

---

Then post it

---

It's a joke.

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

The football team entrance song at Kyle Field is laced with several MF bombs (profane) and racial slurs.

Is this woke, anti-woke, wise, appropriate? Other?

---

Still hoping to get a straight answer on this one:

Were you complaining about Power in 2014?

---

It's pandering to the woke, so it is woke.

---

Well, I would say based on this, woke is not a good thing. Spouting off racial slurs and profanity is probably not what most of us would want our children involved in. TAMU needs to easily correct this.

A large % of the female pop. Is woke.

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

Kozmozag said:

---

A large % of the female pop. Is woke.

---

wokism is when women

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

---

That I don't know, but I'm certainly not convinced it really matters. You can not post those lyrics here on TA due to the anti-profanity algorithms in place. I'm not certain, but the artist that created the song may have some serious misgivings about releasing something as bad as this song.

A&M has a golden opportunity here to become part of the solution, not the problem.

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

---

That I don't know, but I'm certainly not convinced it really matters. You can not post those lyrics here on TA due to the anti-profanity algorithms in place. I'm not certain, but the artist that created the song may have some serious misgivings about releasing something as bad as this song.

A&M has a golden opportunity here to become part of the solution, not the problem.

---

Top notch trolling rn

aTmAg said:

---

Fish orientation was woke AF a couple years ago when my kids went. All the student "leaders" introduced themselves with their pronouns. It was laughably stupid.

---

Agree fish camp has gone to hell. Even as far back as 2008 it was changing and more about acceptance / inclusion than it was about learning the A&M traditions

AgDad121619 said:

---

aTmAg said:

---

Fish orientation was woke AF a couple years ago when my kids went. All the student "leaders" introduced themselves with their pronouns. It was laughably stupid.

---

Agree fish camp has gone to hell. Even as far back as 2008 it was changing and more about acceptance / inclusion than it was about learning the A&M traditions

---

You still learn the traditions

TommyBrady said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

---

That I don't know, but I'm certainly not convinced it really matters. You can not post those lyrics here on TA due to the anti-profanity algorithms in place. I'm not certain, but the artist that created the song may have some serious misgivings about releasing something as bad as this song.

A&M has a golden opportunity here to become part of the solution, not the problem.

---

Top notch trolling rn

---

If you only knew the truth...not trolling at all. Perhaps you wish it was a troll.

Dissemination of information is what I term it:

The team entrance song for Kyle Field is so profane and racist, a second more socially palatable version was created for public consumption. Do we really know which version is in use? Should either version be associated with Texas A&M?

Personally, Muthafu.. and nigg_ are somewhat offensive still. Guilty.

McKelveysCurse said:

---

TommyBrady said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

---

That I don't know, but I'm certainly not convinced it really matters. You can not post those lyrics here on TA due to the anti-profanity algorithms in place. I'm not certain, but the artist that created the song may have some serious misgivings about releasing something as bad as this song.

A&M has a golden opportunity here to become part of the solution, not the problem.

---

Top notch trolling rn

---

If you only knew the truth...not trolling at all. Perhaps you wish it was a troll.

Dissemination of information is what I term it:

The team entrance song for Kyle Field is so profane and racist, a second more socially palatable version was created for public consumption. Do we really know which version is in use? Should either version be associated with Texas A&M?

Personally, Muthafu.. and nigg_ are somewhat offensive still. Guilty.

---

Start a petition to get the song changed then

McKelveysCurse said:

---

TommyBrady said:

---

McKelveysCurse said:

---

icrymyselftosleep said:

---

Don't you have to go search for the extended version to hear profanity?

---

That I don't know, but I'm certainly not convinced it really matters. You can not post those lyrics here on TA due to the anti-profanity algorithms in place. I'm not certain, but the artist that created the song may have some serious misgivings about releasing something as bad as this song.

A&M has a golden opportunity here to become part of the solution, not the problem.

---

Top notch trolling rn

---

If you only knew the truth...not trolling at all. Perhaps you wish it was a troll.

Dissemination of information is what I term it:

The team entrance song for Kyle Field is so profane and racist, a second more socially palatable version was created for public consumption. Do we really know which version is in use? Should either version be associated with Texas A&M?

Personally, Muthafu.. and nigg_ are somewhat offensive still. Guilty.

---

Incredible trolling the time you spent on this was both impressive and sad. The overall trolling though was impeccable

Kid is there now. We actually talked about this during dinner.

"The woke kids are in University Honors. They are all international and gender studies majors. I'm glad to be out of northside where they all live. Being on the south side with the engineers and other stem majors next year will keep me away from all the REEEEEEEEERS. They are the biggest attention seeking people I've ever been around."

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Easy answer: check the ratio of Arts degrees vs Science degrees. If Science isn't clearly dominant, then woke is present.

This is a pretty safe metric because the pool of candidates for Arts professorships are absolutely dominated by leftists. The only exceptions are places like Liberty or Hillsdale who publish their mission of being conservative.

---

This is some great insight!

Which president opened the door for wokeness?

Atm is on the government teet, so yes woke

Earl Rudder

McKelveysCurse said:

---

I do wonder since only 10 seconds or so of the song are played...which version is being played? How do we know?

---

So once again, you are specifically concerned about words that AREN'T being played in Kyle Field.

McKelveysCurse said:

---

Again, which core value led to its selection? I suppose an audible "disclaimer" could be played just prior to the song informing us? Why was a non-explicit version even created? Thanks for clearing things up. Things have really gotten fascinating now. I still maintain we need a new entrance song. TAMU should distance itself from the NON explicit version which is clearly tied to the racist, profane one. Nothing wrong with upgrading the song to something better as this one, whether is a different version, is pretty weak with little power.

---

Ok, ok, ok. You got me. At this point, I now I realize that you've been trolling.

Yes, and the indoctrination is not so subtle. I have a kid there now, and just know that part of the application to get INTO the university is a "Diversity Essay". Then, they are forced to take and pay for courses that meet the liberal goals of social manipulation, such as "Cultural Discourse Requirements" , "International and Cultural Diversity Requirements". Kid is taking a "World Theatre" course to satisfy one of the requirements (has NOTHING to do with any benefits for intended major -- engineering), and says it is horrible. Super liberal hogwash... trying to survive to get what was presented by other students as an 'easy A'... but hates every minute of it.
There are some real eye openers as to indoctrination courses. Some aren't horrible, but some, well are really bad, such as "COMM 338 Critical Race Discourse", "PERF 223 Aesthetics of Activism", "SPMT 336 Diversity in Sport Organizations"
https://catalog.tamu.edu/undergraduate/general-information/degree-information/international-cultural-diversity-requirements/?msclkid=30a9394ecfa811ec910021f9f928c0d8
https://catalog.tamu.edu/undergraduate/general-information/degree-information/cultural-discourse-requirements/#:~:text=Cultural%20Discourse%20Requirements%20Students%20are%20required%20to%20complete,at%20branch%20campuses%2C%20or%20at%20other%20instructional%20locations.?msclkid=30a80267cfa811ecb700dad34b024bcf

Shagga said:

---

It's been woke for a good while. I remember the time I first sat in on one of those parent presentations at a new student conference. Must have been 2013 I think. One of the students came in and stated her name and said "and my preferred pronouns are she / her / hers". That was literally the first time I had ever heard somebody say something like that. I felt like I had entered an alternate universe.

---

That's pretty crazy.

I graduated in May of 2013, and I never heard anyone talk about pronouns at all while I was at A&M. Granted I was an Ag Engineering major, but I was in a FLO my freshman year, and I'm certain the political makeup of that group was balanced, if not leaning slightly left. I still talked with some of the people from that organization my senior year, and was friends with almost all of them on Facebook still. That kind of talk was never made in public, if at all.

dunlay said:

---

Yes, and the indoctrination is not so subtle. I have a kid there now, and just know that part of the application to get INTO the university is a "Diversity Essay". Then, they are forced to take and pay for courses that meet the liberal goals of social manipulation, such as "Cultural Discourse Requirements" , "International and Cultural Diversity Requirements". Kid is taking a "World Theatre" course to satisfy one of the requirements (has NOTHING to do with any benefits for intended major -- engineering), and says it is horrible. Super liberal hogwash... trying to survive to get what was presented by other students as an 'easy A'... but hates every minute of it.
There are some real eye openers as to indoctrination courses. Some aren't horrible, but some, well are really bad, such as "COMM 338 Critical Race Discourse", "PERF 223 Aesthetics of Activism", "SPMT 336 Diversity in Sport Organizations"
https://catalog.tamu.edu/undergraduate/general-information/degree-information/international-cultural-diversity-requirements/?msclkid=30a9394ecfa811ec910021f9f928c0d8
https://catalog.tamu.edu/undergraduate/general-information/degree-information/cultural-discourse-requirements/#:~:text=Cultural%20Discourse%20Requirements%20Students%20are%20required%20to%20complete,at%20branch%20campuses%2C%20or%20at%20other%20instructional%20locations.?msclkid=30a80267cfa811ecb700dad34b024bcf

---

The International & Cultural Diversity requirements have been a thing for at least 12-15 years. When I was in school, you could take a dual credit course that would count as an ICD credit as well as one of your basic credits, like a history or a fine arts credit. I agree they have nothing to do with your major, but then again, why did I have to take a history or social studies class for an engineering degree?

dunlay said:

---

Yes, and the indoctrination is not so subtle. I have a kid there now, and just know that part of the application to get INTO the university is a "Diversity Essay". Then, they are forced to take and pay for courses that meet the liberal goals of social manipulation, such as "Cultural Discourse Requirements" , "International and Cultural Diversity Requirements". Kid is taking a "World Theatre" course to satisfy one of the requirements (has NOTHING to do with any benefits for intended major -- engineering), and says it is horrible. Super liberal hogwash... trying to survive to get what was presented by other students as an 'easy A'... but hates every minute of it.
There are some real eye openers as to indoctrination courses. Some aren't horrible, but some, well are really bad, such as "COMM 338 Critical Race Discourse", "PERF 223 Aesthetics of Activism", "SPMT 336 Diversity in Sport Organizations"

---

Sounds like your kid didn't want to do any work and was just trying to skate by. Funny how that works out.

Maybe they should've looked for a class that interested them.

Surprised dunlay wasn't complaining about their kid having to take POLS 206 & 207 too