Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

...

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

70's 80's crime wave is because abortion wasn't legal? You seriously think killing millions of intercity children (read blacks...) before they have a chance at life is the solution to anything? Crime back then, like today, was due to left-wing policies not people having kids.

How about we do what "planned parenthood's" name suggests and encourage girls and women to plan - and not get pregnant in the first place?

You are probably wearing a mask while you typed this... how about encouraging the sexually active to use condoms to at least protect against sexually transmitted diseases?

How about you get together in 18-20 years and tell those 60 million people you were in favor of them being dead?

Cen-Tex said:

---

I know of a DC jail & a judge that specialize in locking up seditious behavior.

---

that one is (D)ifferent

I just called the TPWD to see what the bag limit is.

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

1. You're wrong about this happening.
2. Even granting the premise, you need to seriously reevaluate your moral compass if that's your concern.

pagerman @ work said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

If only there was away for women to give their children to people that do want them...you know, legally where the new parents take over responsibility for the children and raise them themselves, freeing the woman that doesn't want the child to not be forced to raise the child herself...

There really should be some mechanism like this put in place...

---

Well......there's also the whole not having sex unless your ready to have kids thing. Agency, personal responsibility, blah blah blah.....

sleepybeagle said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

...

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

70's 80's crime wave is because abortion wasn't legal? You seriously think killing millions of intercity children (read blacks...) before they have a chance at life is the solution to anything? Crime back then, like today, was due to left-wing policies not people having kids.

How about we do what "planned parenthood's" name suggests and encourage girls and women to plan - and not get pregnant in the first place?

You are probably wearing a mask while you typed this... how about encouraging the sexually active to use condoms to at least protect against sexually transmitted diseases?

How about you get together in 18-20 years and tell those 60 million people you were in favor of them being dead?

---

I'll say it again-- abortion isn't for me.

But when I was in school in the 80s and 90s, liberals wanted to give out free condoms and birth control to kids and conservatives freaked out

Now conservatives want to do birth control planning? Where were you when I was in high school my man?

And again, I have no more control over anyone else getting an abortion than I do over you thinking clearly. You ain't God. Neither am I. You don't get to judge. Neither do I.

Stop trying to control things that aren't in your control.

aggietony2010 said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

1. You're wrong about this happening.
2. Even granting the premise, you need to seriously reevaluate your moral compass if that's your concern.

---

Sincerely,

Tell me what it's like having permission from the Almighty to judge people? Because the last time I checked, you are responsible for YOU and I am responsible for ME. Abortion isn't for ME. I don't support it. But I'm also not in possession of enough hubris to think I can force YOU to do something.

I'll gladly answer to God that I never condoned abortion on my offspring. How will you answer when he asks if you judged?

"JUDGE NOT" - someone who doesnt read the Bible

Sarge 91 said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

So abortion is about population control. Margaret Sanger would be thrilled with your honesty.

---

Not what I said Sarge. I said that more unwanted kids will equal more crime.

You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it. It's a byproduct.

Clob94 said:

---

Sarge 91 said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

So abortion is about population control. Margaret Sanger would be thrilled with your honesty.

---

Not what I said Sarge. I said that more unwanted kids will equal more crime.

You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it. It's a byproduct.

---

Then we should eliminate liberal policies that punish the poor and make crime advantageous.

Yay! The weekly civil war thread!!!!

aTmAg said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

Sarge 91 said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

So abortion is about population control. Margaret Sanger would be thrilled with your honesty.

---

Not what I said Sarge. I said that more unwanted kids will equal more crime.

You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it. It's a byproduct.

---

Then we should eliminate liberal policies that punish the poor and make crime advantageous.

---

Errr what?

Revolution, you say? I like our chances.

Clob94 said:

---

aTmAg said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

Sarge 91 said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

So abortion is about population control. Margaret Sanger would be thrilled with your honesty.

---

Not what I said Sarge. I said that more unwanted kids will equal more crime.

You know it. I know it. Everybody knows it. It's a byproduct.

---

Then we should eliminate liberal policies that punish the poor and make crime advantageous.

---

Errr what?

---

You have a hard time reading?

Liberal policies reduce punishment for crime and keep the poor poor. All the while buying their votes with other people's money.

If we stopped doing stupid liberal policies the poor would be vastly better off and less likely to resort to crime.

It is always so cute when the Libs get their panties in a wad and start calling for "Revolution" or "Civil War". It is like they don't realize which side has all the guns...

Marcus Brutus said:

---

This guy is a candidate for AG in Florida.

It’s time for a revolution.

— Daniel Uhlfelder (@DWUhlfelderLaw) May 3, 2022

---

He'd go the way of Charlie as soon as someone accepted his proposal.

Who needs a revolution? I'm betting most on the right are more than content to agree to a civil divorce.

Marcus Brutus said:

---

This guy is a candidate for AG in Florida.

It’s time for a revolution.

— Daniel Uhlfelder (@DWUhlfelderLaw) May 3, 2022

---

You know... If I didn't know any better, that's the type of speech that some would say... Oh what's the phrase? It's on the tip of my tongue. I've heard it over and over again since Jan. 6th 2021. Inciting insurrection anyone?

pagerman @ work said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

If only there was a way for women to give their children to people that do want them...you know, legally where the new parents take over responsibility for the children and raise them themselves, freeing the woman that doesn't want the child to not be forced to raise the child herself...

There really should be some mechanism like this put in place...

---

So, based on this comment one should assume there currently aren't any children in foster homes and/or available for adoption.

I mean if there are so many people capable and willing to take these unwanted kids on there certainly shouldn't be any issue right now, correct?

To me this is similar to the idiot libs who want open borders, but wouldn't dare take some illegals in. How many kids are you going to adopt?

Quote:

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

Margret?
Is that you?

see Freakanomics.....

Jack Squat 83 said:

---

I predict someday, someone somewhere will come up with a ground-breaking way to prevent unplanned pregnancies.

---

I have been thinking about this.... and I have the solution....

..... DONT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE. If you get married and have sex, accept the reality that children may or may not come about as a result of it.

TheEternalPessimist said:

---

Jack Squat 83 said:

---

I predict someday, someone somewhere will come up with a ground-breaking way to prevent unplanned pregnancies.

---

I have been thinking about this.... and I have the solution....

..... DONT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE. If you get married and have sex, accept the reality that children may or may not come about as a result of it.

---

Yeah the idiots who did the BLM riots and are looting stores don't think that far ahead.

One side has been stockpiling guns and ammo and knows how to use them. The other side can't figure out which bathroom they're supposed to use.

Just created a twitter accounted. Reported for fomenting insurrection.

Quote:

---

One side has been stockpiling guns and ammo and knows how to use them. The other side can't figure out which bathroom they're supposed to use.

---

Except the "other side" is more organized to steal stuff.

TxTarpon said:

---

Quote:

---

One side has been stockpiling guns and ammo and knows how to use them. The other side can't figure out which bathroom they're supposed to use.

---

Except the "other side" is more organized to steal stuff.

---

The only reason they get away with their mob theft is because the other side doesn't want to go to jail for intervening. If revolution, those rules go out the window and it is shoot on sight. Somehow I think the thieves will be less effective

Scotty Appleton said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Clob94 said:

---

TxTarpon said:

---

All posturing.
Like TexIT
No central leadership
No set goals or timelines
Just gab
This is 'merica where talk is cheap cheap cheap

---

Let's you and I get together in 18-20 years when another 1970-80s style crime wave rolls over this country because there's 60 million more kids being raised in households that don't want them. That will be their revolution and we will ALL suffer.

---

If only there was a way for women to give their children to people that do want them...you know, legally where the new parents take over responsibility for the children and raise them themselves, freeing the woman that doesn't want the child to not be forced to raise the child herself...

There really should be some mechanism like this put in place...

---

So, based on this comment one should assume there currently aren't any children in foster homes and/or available for adoption.

I mean if there are so many people capable and willing to take these unwanted kids on there certainly shouldn't be any issue right now, correct?

To me this is similar to the idiot libs who want open borders, but wouldn't dare take some illegals in. How many kids are you going to adopt?

---

Most of the kids that don't get adopted are older and did not enter the foster system as infants.

There is a huge demand for infants. You can dislike that all you want, but there it is. Why do you think so many people adopt from overseas? Its a supply/demand situation and the demand is simply not being met by the domestic supply.

There are more than enough parents for infants. As I am a single (divorced) adult male past the point in life where I want to raise children I will not be adopting any kids, short of some family situation that may arise. That said, I volunteer as a case worker with CASA and work with kids in the foster system to get them the best possible situation and outcome.

The notion that to oppose abortion on demand I must agree to adopt some amount of theoretical children that will allegedly result as an unintended consequence of overturning a terribly reasoned and simply bad-on-the-law decision is farcical. It is at best faulty logic and at worst fear mongering to justify keeping a factually terrible ruling in place because it meets your political goals.

Roe is a terrible decision that was clearly the result of the court have a pre-conceived purely political decision in hand and then trying to justify their frankly unconstitutional actions by then backwards engineering some kind of justification to cover their unjustifiable actions. The Court wanted abortion to be legal and so they cobbled together rather ridiculous justification to make that ruling.

I don't want any court engaging in that kind of activism parading around as jurisprudence, and frankly no thinking person should.

Quote:

---

The only reason they get away with their mob theft is because the other side doesn't want to go to jail for intervening. If revolution, those rules go out the window and it is shoot on sight. Somehow I think the thieves will be less effective

---

Organized > Disorganized

Without leadership stuff fails.

Ha! The enemy of this nation went to war over states rights for own the labor of another individual and now they want to go to war of individual freedom to kill babies.

The enemy of this nation has their heads up their collective asses.

Quote:

---

The enemy of this nation has their heads up their collective asses.

---

Not China.
As soon as a civil war/federal govt instability happens they will be landing on the west coast.
As soon as TexIT happened Chairman Xi would send minions with shipping containers of cash and gold for land, ports and bases. And yes, some corrupt Texans would sell us out for their own gain.