Would that be known as a Taint Tuck among the cosmetic surgery crowd?skinny2001 said:
cut his ***** off and shove the tissue up his pareneum
Would that be known as a Taint Tuck among the cosmetic surgery crowd?skinny2001 said:
cut his ***** off and shove the tissue up his pareneum

lead said:
Serious question: let's say a biological male is in the process of transitioning….they presumably have sexual attraction to others, probably of the same sex as their own biology or maybe to other trans persons. During sexual activity, do they still experience their biological orgasm through ejaculation?
You would die so a bunch of mental cases can prance around in the opposite gender's clothing? Seems like quite the waste.Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
Because they are trying to force their worldview on everyone else, and if there is anything those pushing tyranny can't stand, it is dissent. Public dissent emboldens those who might disagree to push back so they attack anyone or any institution that resists. If they can force their way at A&M they can force their way anywhere. They aren't satisfied with anything less than 100% acceptance - or at least compliance.TexAgs91 said:Ok, with all the other "universities" out there that are more liberal/woke, why would they choose A&M?Tanya 93 said:TexAgs91 said:Just wondering, considering there's other "universities" that would love this kind of stuff, why they are pushing so hard to do this stuff at A&M?Tex117 said:
If they want to...they can.
What's the big deal?
They attend A&M?
BingoAg87H2O said:Because they are trying to force their worldview on everyone else, and if there is anything those pushing tyranny can't stand, it is dissent. Public dissent emboldens those who might disagree to push back so they attack anyone or any institution that resists. If they can force their way at A&M they can force their way anywhere. They aren't satisfied with anything less than 100% acceptance - or at least compliance.TexAgs91 said:Ok, with all the other "universities" out there that are more liberal/woke, why would they choose A&M?Tanya 93 said:TexAgs91 said:Just wondering, considering there's other "universities" that would love this kind of stuff, why they are pushing so hard to do this stuff at A&M?Tex117 said:
If they want to...they can.
What's the big deal?
They attend A&M?
It will be buried in the same law outlawing adultery, blasphemy, and divorce, or maybe in the new Constitutional Amendment guaranteeing religious freedom for only the religions we like.MarathonAg12 said:TheEternalPessimist said:
We will ban this crap one day.
I swear by it.
How do you plan on doing that?
SpreadsheetAg said:
Rudder Theater Capacity = 750
https://visit.cstx.gov/listing/rudder-theatre-complex/1516/#:~:text=The%20Auditorium%20has%20a%20seating,a%20seating%20capacity%20of%20750.
Texas A&M Enrollment (2021) = 73,284
https://today.tamu.edu/2021/10/20/record-enrollment-numbers-continue-at-texas-am/
% of population concerned = 1.023%
Martin Cash said:Seriously?Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
That's a hill i will NEVER die on.
The only acceptable action would be to mostly-peaceful protest the show by blocking entrances and setting fires. I heard somewhere that was OK when a conservative was going to speak on a college campus.Science Denier said:Martin Cash said:Seriously?Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
That's a hill i will NEVER die on.
Freedom of expression is one of many rights we have in this country that have been protected by men that did die on that hill.
Neither libs or conservatives can tell me what I can wear. Banning expression because you don't like it is no different than lib banning expression they don't like on social.
You don't have to like it. You don't have to pay for it.
Science Denier said:Martin Cash said:Seriously?Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
That's a hill i will NEVER die on.
Freedom of expression is one of many rights we have in this country that have been protected by men that did die on that hill.
Neither libs or conservatives can tell me what I can wear. Banning expression because you don't like it is no different than lib banning expression they don't like on social.
You don't have to like it. You don't have to pay for it.
I mean, most folks already knew this, but this is a great example of confirming that conservative tears around cancel culture were never about freedom of speech and was just more partisan hackery.RebelE Infantry said:larry culpepper said:Ok, then just admit you are in favor of cancel culture then.RebelE Infantry said:Ag_of_08 said:
So people are being offended and want to cancel something because feelings?
And no direct comparison is not false equivalency
You're not going to score points with me using this line.
My problem with cancel culture is that it cancels the wrong things.
Cancel culture is okay when you are cancelling things that offend you.
Absolutely.
Cancelling bad things is good.
Cancelling good things is bad.
Simple as.
AggieVictor10 said:I mean, most folks already knew this, but this is a great example of confirming that conservative tears around cancel culture were never about freedom of speech and was just more partisan hackery.RebelE Infantry said:larry culpepper said:Ok, then just admit you are in favor of cancel culture then.RebelE Infantry said:Ag_of_08 said:
So people are being offended and want to cancel something because feelings?
And no direct comparison is not false equivalency
You're not going to score points with me using this line.
My problem with cancel culture is that it cancels the wrong things.
Cancel culture is okay when you are cancelling things that offend you.
Absolutely.
Cancelling bad things is good.
Cancelling good things is bad.
Simple as.
Well, I hate to break it to you, but they technically did. Freedom of speech includes speech that you hate as well as speech you love.RebelE Infantry said:Science Denier said:Martin Cash said:Seriously?Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
That's a hill i will NEVER die on.
Freedom of expression is one of many rights we have in this country that have been protected by men that did die on that hill.
Neither libs or conservatives can tell me what I can wear. Banning expression because you don't like it is no different than lib banning expression they don't like on social.
You don't have to like it. You don't have to pay for it.
Imagine believing that a single American serviceman ever fought and died for the freedom of expression for drag queens.
Eh. There are plenty of real-life examples of conservative cancel culture. This board is just evidence that the attitude is alive and well.redcrayon said:AggieVictor10 said:I mean, most folks already knew this, but this is a great example of confirming that conservative tears around cancel culture were never about freedom of speech and was just more partisan hackery.RebelE Infantry said:larry culpepper said:Ok, then just admit you are in favor of cancel culture then.RebelE Infantry said:Ag_of_08 said:
So people are being offended and want to cancel something because feelings?
And no direct comparison is not false equivalency
You're not going to score points with me using this line.
My problem with cancel culture is that it cancels the wrong things.
Cancel culture is okay when you are cancelling things that offend you.
Absolutely.
Cancelling bad things is good.
Cancelling good things is bad.
Simple as.
That's a pretty big conclusion from a couple of posts on a college football politics board.
It's astounding, time is fleeting.AzAg80 said:
The A&M I attended back in the 70's is obviously only a memory now.
Don't be daft…They were fighting for the general freedom. I'm sure many if not most would probably be disinterested or even offended by drag queens. Then again, maybe all service men should make a list of what they will or won't fight for regarding their interpretation of the constitution. As point out earlier, you don't have to like someone's freedom of speech, expression etc., but if you aren't willing to fight for their right, you can't expect anyone to fight for yours. That is the beauty of how the framers developed the constitution. And incidentally, I've seen fans at NASCAR that could pass for a DG with their flowing mullets. But, they weren't impeding my freedoms in any wayRebelE Infantry said:Science Denier said:Martin Cash said:Seriously?Science Denier said:
If this **** is not funded with tax dollars, they can do what they want.
I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death their right to do it.
That's a hill i will NEVER die on.
Freedom of expression is one of many rights we have in this country that have been protected by men that did die on that hill.
Neither libs or conservatives can tell me what I can wear. Banning expression because you don't like it is no different than lib banning expression they don't like on social.
You don't have to like it. You don't have to pay for it.
Imagine believing that a single American serviceman ever fought and died for the freedom of expression for drag queens.
I recall the fun times when it showed at Campus Theatre. Full house.Faustus said:It's astounding, time is fleeting.AzAg80 said:
The A&M I attended back in the 70's is obviously only a memory now.
Madness takes control.
You can check out the Rocky Horror Picture Show from what looks like the Texas A&M library (Evans: Media and Reserves (Annex 1st floor)).
https://catalog.library.tamu.edu/Record/in00002589338