aggiehawg said:
This hearing is stupid. Counsel hands her a document asks if she is familiar with it, she says she is not but then he proceeds to ask her questions about it anyway. Judge just facepalms..
Lawyer Batsignal - Lawfare MTG Ballot Battle
4,963 Views |
64 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Ulrich
Are you watching this?
Jesus! A screen shot captured by someone unknown of a FB post with no foundation? And it is a short clip from a longer post?
Are there no longer any rules of evidence in this court?
Are there no longer any rules of evidence in this court?
Now this lawyer is using a scene from the movie Independence Day? The we will not go quietly into the night speech. That was a paraphrase from a poem by Dylan Thomas.
Her using the same words is for the purpose of fomenting insurrection?
Her using the same words is for the purpose of fomenting insurrection?
aggiehawg said:
Now using the term "1776" is calling for overthrow of the government?
Petitioner tries to get MTG to accept that any reference to 1776 is a call to violence.
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) April 22, 2022
She points out that 1776 is on the state seal hanging in the courtroom.
Judge laughs.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
This judge has been laughing, smirking, face palming all during this.
I've seen some crazy things in a courtroom before but this lawyer is not only a jerk in manner but is pulling crap out of his butt to try to craft such a stupid narrative.
I've seen some crazy things in a courtroom before but this lawyer is not only a jerk in manner but is pulling crap out of his butt to try to craft such a stupid narrative.
I haven't been able toaggiehawg said:
Are you watching this?
I don't think anyone in their right mind could say she had "engaged in insurrection."
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
I agree with you. BTW: Is she your rep?GeorgiAg said:
I don't think anyone in their right mind could say she had "engaged in insurrection."
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
Because she said similar to a line in a movie about using force to stop an invasion by aliens. He literally asked her about that. Plays the clip, she says, "Good speech" and then he asked her, "Well you know that was a call to arms to use violence, right? Isn't that what you meant too?"GeorgiAg said:
I don't think anyone in their right mind could say she had "engaged in insurrection."
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
Just nucking futs.
No, I'm in a district gerrymandered to be Dem. It's south and west Atlanta and my county is skewing even more African-American. David Scott (D) is my rep.e=mc2 said:I agree with you. BTW: Is she your rep?GeorgiAg said:
I don't think anyone in their right mind could say she had "engaged in insurrection."
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
Wow. How embarrassing for that guy.aggiehawg said:Because she said similar to a line in a movie about using force to stop an invasion by aliens. He literally asked her about that. Plays the clip, she says, "Good speech" and then he asked her, "Well you know that was a call to arms to use violence, right? Isn't that what you meant too?"GeorgiAg said:
I don't think anyone in their right mind could say she had "engaged in insurrection."
And she didn't "give aid or encouragement to our enemies." They were American protesters. It's idiotic on its face.
Just nucking futs.
It’s really hard to believe that this lawyer questioning MTG is the best the left could do.
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) April 22, 2022
Haven't caught his name yet but he's really dumb. Has an active imagination in bringing such disparate events, quotes, time lines to show "evidence" of her fomenting insurrection. But otherwise, insanely dumb.justcallmeharry said:It’s really hard to believe that this lawyer questioning MTG is the best the left could do.
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) April 22, 2022
This hearing is before an administrative law judge.
Closing arguments starting now. MTG's attorney up now.
Closing arguments starting now. MTG's attorney up now.
When the petitioner tries to get MTG to say that her use of "1776" was a call for violence, she points out that 1776 is on the Georgia state seal:
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) April 22, 2022
"I don't know if you've noticed our state seal here in Georgia, but as you can see we enjoy our history and are proud of our freedom pic.twitter.com/fYDW6q7Iig
31 House Democrats objected to George W. Bush's election certification in 2004.
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) April 22, 2022
7 House Democrats objected to Donald Trump's election certification in 2016.
Now, they're trying to kick MTG off the ballot in her district for doing exactly what they did.
Is this guy really arguing that when people take oath of office as a US Representative they lose their First Amendment rights?
Yep, that's what he is saying.
Yep, that's what he is saying.
Show trial.
Apparently the Secretary of the State of Georgia (a Republican) has the final say on this. And there is no way he'll disqualify her regardless whether or not the judge recommends disqualification. And it doesn't even look like that's gonna happen.
Apparently the Secretary of the State of Georgia (a Republican) has the final say on this. And there is no way he'll disqualify her regardless whether or not the judge recommends disqualification. And it doesn't even look like that's gonna happen.
Is the Judge going to render a decision today?aggiehawg said:
Is this guy really arguing that when people take oath of office as a US Representative they lose their First Amendment rights?
Yep, that's what he is saying.
TIA
Don't think so. There are still some briefs to be filed from I've heard today.justcallmeharry said:Is the Judge going to render a decision today?aggiehawg said:
Is this guy really arguing that when people take oath of office as a US Representative they lose their First Amendment rights?
Yep, that's what he is saying.
TIA
Thanks!aggiehawg said:Don't think so. There are still some briefs to be filed from I've heard today.justcallmeharry said:Is the Judge going to render a decision today?aggiehawg said:
Is this guy really arguing that when people take oath of office as a US Representative they lose their First Amendment rights?
Yep, that's what he is saying.
TIA
Who hasn't banged their personal trainer?Tom Kazansky 2012 said:
For the record MTG may not be the most politically savvy, and maybe she did bang her personal trainer and of course has baggage...
But I'll take her over 90% of washington as she is consistently on the side of representing her constituents, the middle class, and doesnt appear to be bought and paid for by special interests.
For this voter challenge that was made to the Sec of State Raffensperger it goes to the admin law judge and then back to Raffensperger after judge makes his findings.AggieUSMC said:
Show trial.
Apparently the Secretary of the State of Georgia (a Republican) has the final say on this. And there is no way he'll disqualify her regardless whether or not the judge recommends disqualification. And it doesn't even look like that's gonna happen.
There is also another federal court suit going on over this. Don't know where that suit stands at the moment.
They are literally quoting Independence Day to MTG at this point
— 1776 Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) April 22, 2022
BlueAnon has lost their ever-loving minds pic.twitter.com/k3iHqHks8g
I find the most damning thing of all is that the leftists have pushed so ****ing far that conservatives feel the need to vote for idiots like this. This is a condemnation of the departure leftism has taken from reality.
Look for MTG to stay in Congress.
https://t.co/y1qyZVA2OP pic.twitter.com/l463XcvID6
— Jess (@jessiprincey) May 6, 2022
It ain't over yet.
LinkQuote:
A judge in Georgia on Friday found that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) can run for reelection, rejecting arguments from a group of voters who had challenged her eligibility over allegations that she engaged in insurrection. But the decision will ultimately be up to Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
State Administrative Law Judge Charles Beaudrot announced his decision after a daylong hearing in April that included arguments from lawyers for the voters and for Greene, as well as extensive questioning of Greene herself.
State law says Beaudrot must submit his findings to Raffensperger, who has to decide whether Greene should be removed from the ballot.
Can the idiot lawyer who prosecuted this be disbarred for being an idiot?
Asking cause the world has way too many idiot lawyers.
Asking cause the world has way too many idiot lawyers.
The world needs mean tweets
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
PaulC_80 said:
From what I understand these Libs/Dems are contending that anyone that questioned the 2020 Election were trying to over throw the Govt and should be barred from serving in any elected office ever again. So questioning the Govt or what has happened is enough to get you barred from running for office or participating in this countries govt for the rest of your life.
Disgusting. Libs/Dems are absolutely disgusting and a danger to the Republic.
What is unfortunate is at some point these people will have to be dealt with or they are going to deal with you. This will not end peacefully and I have history as proof.
A really smart way to preserve a healthy republic is to prevent political opponents from legitimate participation. Taking away every option in the system never forces people to work outside the system.
Featured Stories
See All