The Marxist knows that...and that's what the good Marxist wants.AustinScubaAg said:Wealth and income are not the same. Taxing wealth is a sure way to destroy wealth. Anyone with any understanding economics would understand that since it is basic supply and demand. There are only two ways to tax wealthBubblez said:Keller6Ag91 said:"No where close to being balanced". So when the top 50% of income earners carry 97% of the Individual tax burden, when are we getting "balanced"? And the top 1% carry over 25% of the burden. Again, what is balanced?Bubblez said:Ellis Wyatt said:The OP fully supports this regime. He thinks they aren't marxist enough.Fedup said:
Yes agree. But if you think you're middle class, then this admin thinks you're part of the entitled rich.
The current tax policy is very much where Trump left it.
And yes, if Marxism means the wealthy pay according to how much they benefit from this economic system, then call me a Marxist. The scales are no where close to being balanced
https://taxfoundation.org/publications/latest-federal-income-tax-data/
The top 1% have over 34% of the wealth locked up. The bottom 50% have less than 2%. Our taxation should be focused on wealth
1. Sell assets to cover taxes. In this scenario there are not enough buyers that can afford the massive amount of assets so the prices drop and a large amount of wealth is simply destroyed.
2. Direct transfer of assets to government. This is either pure socialism where the government ends up owning everything or the government has to sell resulting in #1.
Wealth Taxes would destroy the economy.