I'd argue it should go through middle school or not be allowed in school at all. What makes 4th graders ready for this stuff?
Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
Predmid said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
At least when I wasin Florida schools, this was the case.
The people who are against this bill are a very minor but vocal minority. Basically mouth breathers on Twitter.Hungry Ojos said:
There is literally no other reason not to support this bill aside from your desire to groom children.
None.
I just left Florida for Missouri, if I remember right sex ed starts in 5th or 6th grade therePredmid said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
At least when I wasin Florida schools, this was the case.
Y'all get sex ed?Predmid said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
At least when I wasin Florida schools, this was the case.
kb2001 said:
I remember having sex ed in 4th grade. For girls, it's important to start then because periods are coming soon for some of them, and they need to know what to expect. I realize parents should teach this and not depend on the schools to do it, but this way ensures kids with bad/stupid parents still get this information and it can be trusted. If my wife weren't around to teach my daughters, I'd have a hard time teaching them without help from a woman.
I would imagine it's pretty terrifying for young girls to learn their vaginas are going to bleed for a week every month for the next 30-40 years, probably best not to scare them until 4th grade when it could be imminent. There is no reason to start before 4th grade, and the bill reinforces that sex ed won't be taught before 4th grade.
Today, I would agree. 30 years ago, I feel it could be trusted.End Of Message said:kb2001 said:
I remember having sex ed in 4th grade. For girls, it's important to start then because periods are coming soon for some of them, and they need to know what to expect. I realize parents should teach this and not depend on the schools to do it, but this way ensures kids with bad/stupid parents still get this information and it can be trusted. If my wife weren't around to teach my daughters, I'd have a hard time teaching them without help from a woman.
I would imagine it's pretty terrifying for young girls to learn their vaginas are going to bleed for a week every month for the next 30-40 years, probably best not to scare them until 4th grade when it could be imminent. There is no reason to start before 4th grade, and the bill reinforces that sex ed won't be taught before 4th grade.
I fervently dispute the information can be "trusted,"particularly from government education.
baron_von_awesome said:The people who are against this bill are a very minor but vocal minority. Basically mouth breathers on Twitter.Hungry Ojos said:
There is literally no other reason not to support this bill aside from your desire to groom children.
None.
torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
Their bodies yes, but not their teachers bodies and sexual proclivitiestorrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
That doesn't mean the it's the governments job.torrid said:I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
torrid said:I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
End Of Message said:torrid said:I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
Ok, and? How is it remotely appropriate for the government to explain those things to a child?
At the very youngest I would say let it start in 7th grade simply because kids are hitting puberty at such a young age now days. I remember I was in 8th grade when I had "the talk" with my parents, which is the best option, to let the parents deal with this stuff.Texasaggie32 said:
I'd argue it should go through middle school or not be allowed in school at all. What makes 4th graders ready for this stuff?
Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
In Texas? We got put in a room and watched a video about our "changing bodies" in 5th grade. I remember none of itTanya 93 said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
Benny got the first talk in 4th.
They get a much more detailed on this month. It is 7th grade.
icrymyselftosleep said:In Texas? We got put in a room and watched a video about our "changing bodies" in 5th grade. I remember none of itTanya 93 said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
Benny got the first talk in 4th.
They get a much more detailed on this month. It is 7th grade.
"Health teacher"...what is this foreign concept? Sounds like MO has some idea of what to teach kids about themselves (or at least better than what I got here).Tanya 93 said:icrymyselftosleep said:In Texas? We got put in a room and watched a video about our "changing bodies" in 5th grade. I remember none of itTanya 93 said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Is 4th grade the first time they introduce the beginning of sex education?
Benny got the first talk in 4th.
They get a much more detailed on this month. It is 7th grade.
Missouri.
His former Cub Scout/Webelos leader is his PE/Health teacher.
She sent the email out a couple of weeks ago explaining what will be discussed and how to opt out if desired. They will go to the library during the talks
Exact same thing hereTree Hugger said:
I remember in 5th grade (almost positive on that) that there was one day when the girls were held back from recess that day for a "presentation"
MapGuy said:That doesn't mean the it's the governments job.torrid said:I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
Quote:Quote:
Their bodies yes, but not their teachers bodies and sexual proclivities
Now that you mention it...agsalaska said:MapGuy said:That doesn't mean the it's the governments job.torrid said:I'm not going to get into details, but i have seen where parents failed to explain even the rudimentary basics of sexual education to their children.End Of Message said:torrid said:
There are biological reasons that girls 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies.
From their parents, not the government
I have never understood this logic unless you are arguing that schooling children is not the government's job.
Is that your argument? That we should close public schools?
OK. Fair enough. I read your early post as 'sex ed is not the governments job' and may have been combining your posts with another poster. I have always found the argument against sex ed in schools to be silly.MapGuy said:
Schooling yes, but I may be conflating two issues and chose my words poorly on this point. Sex ed, sure teach it but notify the parents ahead of time with the teaching materials, but when it comes to talking to children about one's sexuality or that of the teacher, that is not the role of the government nor the teacher. As I said earlier in this thread when the poster said their are biological reasons that girls in 4th grade and older need to understand what is going on with their bodies:Quote:Quote:
Their bodies yes, but not their teachers bodies and sexual proclivities
🚨🚨🚨 This school is grooming MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS on the internet, and we have videos of it.
— Karlyn Borysenko, Tower Event Creator 🇺🇦 (@DrKarlynB) April 4, 2022
Watch as a 7th grader discusses coming out in 5th grade with the help of her school guidance counselor.
Let's unpack what's going on in the most woke school district in America. 🧵 pic.twitter.com/L21yX7spnj