You cannot define "man". If there is no woman or no man, there can be no:
Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Transsexual
Questioning
etc.

Well, maybe you can have QuestIoning, because I suppose it's all a huge question mark to the woke.

There are man and woman. Anything in between is a bunch of made up bull*****

Hermaphrodites say Howdy.

agz win said:

---

Hermaphrodites say Howdy.

---

I'm not a biologist, so I cannot define hermaphrodite either. If our judges cannot define man or woman, they cannot define hermaphrodite.

Equal pay or everyone!

Saw a billboard on I35 going south out of Ft. Worth:

Men are from Mars
Women are from Venus
Anything else is from Uranus.

agz win said:

---

Hermaphrodites say Howdy.

---

Only one set of genitals is functional typically.

Bondag said:

---

Equal pay or everyone!

---

And so long Title IX!

How can you hate men if you can't define "men"?

Checkmate, things.

And there goes pride month. No more pride parades I guess.

And no more hate crimes against the LGBTQ community, because they no longer exist.

Biden's America

SCIENCE! 😂 pic.twitter.com/RWB0BIlMzf

— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) March 25, 2022

Look, y'all... We gotta follow the SCIENCE!!!

Wouldn't a true biologist say the chromosomes define a woman or man?!!! Simple as that?

Either you "follow the science " or you don't.

How does Jackson know what she is. Could be an "it". The "it" answer disqualifies her, it or what ever. A commie fraud for sure.

We need to start taking over the police and D.A. departments. That's it. After that, just start kicking ass and taking back ground. The people pushing this nonsense are absolute Ps.

Keegan99 said:

---

SCIENCE! 😂 pic.twitter.com/RWB0BIlMzf

— Joel Berry (@JoelWBerry) March 25, 2022

Look, y'all... We gotta follow the SCIENCE!!!

---

When we can no longer define what is simply "man" and "woman"

I fear the attack (or deconstruction as I believe it is called in postmodernism) on other definitions, meanings, facts, science, and long-standing beliefs will escalate and hasten our society and culture towards further chaos. Mathematics, history, biology. These have all come under attack, but have been defended to some extent. This is Marxist social constructionism at work.

When the intelligentsia promote, and the public accepts, that we can no longer trust our definition of "woman" because there is "no simple answer," than how do we trust anything? For example, our own history? The Founding Fathers, capitalism and our system of government?

I don't see this matter of our ability to define woman as insignificant at all. These are all incremental steps towards dismantling, or reimagining as they would say, our current society.

When people no longer believe in the superiority of our values which have been destabilized and upended by these incessant attacks the leftists, neo-Marxists, postmodernists, whatever you want to call them, will fill the void with their own ideology.

agz win said:

---

Hermaphrodites say Howdy.

---

This lib here had no response to the question a few days ago. It seems he's gotten his talking points from redditt, DU, etc...

Hermaphrodites!

The deconstructionists make it a question of semantics , which it is to a degree. It's what people agree the definition to be to provide a common frame of reference for communication, but the deconstructionists want to break that down into individual perceptions such that we can't effectively communicate because we choose not to accept a single frame of reference.

Some of science now follows this lead, and discards previous established common frames of reference for various conflicting linguistic interpretations to represent the common body of data (which doesn't change) and muddies the waters of a previous source of stability against deconstructionism.

Jack Squat 83 said:

---

Wouldn't a true biologist say the chromosomes define a woman or man?!!! Simple as that?

Either you "follow the science " or you don't.

---

Nuh-uhhhhhhh. There's, like, thes things called, like gene translocations and, like nondisjunction events and androgen insufficiencies and, like, all this "variation" and ***** This stuff effects, like, gender and **** for like 1 in a few thousand people, so we have to acknowledge their truth and stop having these violent definition things that are accurate for 99.99% of all human beings.

#science

I don't think science means what people think it means anymore.

Sexual dimorphism was invented by a white "man" and is literally why we have Nazis.

Can't tell black, white, Asian, brown, etc either since you need that biology degree for that.

Looks like we can toss out a lot of hate crime laws...

I like how woman can't be defined right in time during women history month. How can you celebrate the history of something you can't even define?

Ginsburg has to be rolling in her grave.

cisgenderedAggie said:

---

Jack Squat 83 said:

---

Wouldn't a true biologist say the chromosomes define a woman or man?!!! Simple as that?

Either you "follow the science " or you don't.

---

Nuh-uhhhhhhh. There's, like, thes things called, like gene translocations and, like nondisjunction events and androgen insufficiencies and, like, all this "variation" and ***** This stuff effects, like, gender and **** for like 1 in a few thousand people, so we have to acknowledge their truth and stop having these violent definition things that are accurate for 99.99% of all human beings.

#science

---

You are missing some 9's

Jackson isn't going to be able to decide any equal pay cases either if there are no gender differences. What's the problem now? There are no differences.

AgSportsFan89 said:

---

I like how woman can't be defined right in time during women history month. How can you celebrate the history of something you can't even define?

---

Good point. Time to scrap womens history month or womens appreciation month, whatever it's called. Also no big deal having KBJ as a justice, since it's just an it and no longer the first black woman justice.

Well, let's change the terms we use to be more precise. Use male and female. Those are really pretty easy to define. Each sex comes with not only obvious external characteristics but unquestionable genetics.

There are statistical outliers, biological anomalies, but in the vast majority of cases male and female are simple to define into which you can categorize everyone. The fact that we're even having this discussion is absurd.

Male = XY
Female = XX

Instead of women's swimming competition you have female swimming competition. If we do that then you don't have the travesty that's occurring right now and women sports. If you have an X and the Y chromosome you compete on the male team and/or against other males.

The progressives have been explicitly clear...they want to 'destroy the nuclear family'

If you can remove the definition of man/woman, contrary to the facts...you can accomplish that goal much faster.

They are succeeding. People need to start fighting back, being vocal, demanding this nonsense stops.

I guess we're done with all the "patriarchy" nonsense then, too, right?!

Adios Title IX

rocky with the slam dunk.

just waiting for the alphabet crew to show up.

Small thinking.

Cash in.
White folks need to identify as POCs, get HUB status and make bank.