She's already showed her hand, and is just trying to be relevant again with the election coming up. She is the Crenshaw of the Red North.

Still wood, though.

I'd still vote for her over some, but we already have better alternatives in Trump and DeSantis.

I think Noem got dropped\doxed\cancelled by a group of people that are so hyper charged that they don't even research and think for themselves. Just as this article says, the legislation that she originally vetoed had bad language in it that opened the door for litigation. It was a rushed bill. She vetoed and said do better. The super charged American public dropped her and cancelled her because of that. She is a heck of a conservative despite how quickly everyone dropped her. This bill is a lot better than the original.

C@LAg said:

---

title IX lawsuit and ACLU-instigated rights lawsuit, coming up

but someone needs to start the ball rolling

---

If gender is fluid then I'm not funding womens sports with football money. Title IX should be voided.

There's one thing that puzzles me.

I know a few people on the left, but not that many, and plenty on the right.

I have never run into anyone who thinks that allowing genetic males to play on women's sports teams is a good idea.

I'm really curious about who thinks that this crazy scheme has ever been a good idea.

eric76 said:

---

There's one thing that puzzles me.

I know a few people on the left, but not that many, and plenty on the right.

I have never run into anyone who thinks that allowing genetic males to play on women's sports teams is a good idea.

I'm really curious about who thinks that this crazy scheme has ever been a good idea.

---

eric, you're not going to run in those circles of people because you're not a communist. The people that think transitioning males should be allowed to play and dominate women's sports are those who want to fundamentally change the US into Communist China. They are not sympathetic to the trans community, they just want to tear the country apart.

country said:

---

I think Noem got dropped\doxed\cancelled by a group of people that are so hyper charged that they don't even research and think for themselves. Just as this article says, the legislation that she originally vetoed had bad language in it that opened the door for litigation. It was a rushed bill. She vetoed and said do better. The super charged American public dropped her and cancelled her because of that. She is a heck of a conservative despite how quickly everyone dropped her. This bill is a lot better than the original.

---

Lol, no. Go back and read the original articles on what happened.

She wanted collegiate athletics dropped altogether from the original bill. Why? Because of the threats from the NCAA and corporations. Lots of money involved, so she buckled.

She will not stand on principle. She has proven that. Hopefully her career ends at the governorship. She's cut from the same mold as W.

eric76 said:

---

There's one thing that puzzles me.

I know a few people on the left, but not that many, and plenty on the right.

I have never run into anyone who thinks that allowing genetic males to play on women's sports teams is a good idea.

I'm really curious about who thinks that this crazy scheme has ever been a good idea.

---

Yeah but 81 million supposedly voted for the dementia idiot that has put it openly at the top of his agenda and that was before the election.

On Noem she caved on the first bill. She guessed wrong on the issue and was trying to gain national favor. It was a dumb move.

AGHouston11 said:

---

eric76 said:

---

There's one thing that puzzles me.

I know a few people on the left, but not that many, and plenty on the right.

I have never run into anyone who thinks that allowing genetic males to play on women's sports teams is a good idea.

I'm really curious about who thinks that this crazy scheme has ever been a good idea.

---

Yeah but 81 million supposedly voted for the dementia idiot that has put it openly at the top of his agenda and that was before the election.

On Noem she caved on the first bill. She guessed wrong on the issue and was trying to gain national favor. It was a dumb move.

---

Bingo.

Quote:

---

based on the biological sex at birth of the participating athletes

---

Is there a biological sex not at birth that I am unaware of?

Marcus Brutus said:

---

country said:

---

I think Noem got dropped\doxed\cancelled by a group of people that are so hyper charged that they don't even research and think for themselves. Just as this article says, the legislation that she originally vetoed had bad language in it that opened the door for litigation. It was a rushed bill. She vetoed and said do better. The super charged American public dropped her and cancelled her because of that. She is a heck of a conservative despite how quickly everyone dropped her. This bill is a lot better than the original.

---

Lol, no. Go back and read the original articles on what happened.

She wanted collegiate athletics dropped altogether from the original bill. Why? Because of the threats from the NCAA and corporations. Lots of money involved, so she buckled.

She will not stand on principle. She has proven that. Hopefully her career ends at the governorship. She's cut from the same mold as W.

---

Lol.....if you think she is cut from the same mold as W, I don't know how to have a conversation about her with you. I'm not going to die on this hill, but she is a very conservative leader. She's better than 99% of what we have serving at the moment but mental midgets latch on to one item and make it the gospel. Carry on.

Aren't there nutballs out there who just won't put the sex on the birth certificate because they want their child to choose later?

The first "gender girl" bill had flaws. Read it.