By Pelosi when Trump requested for January 6. She denied the request so what we know of January 6 to be to happen.

The democrats sensed a few outliers to do something and they didn't want the National Guard there to prevent anything so something would occur to use for political purposes. F Nancy!!

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

By Pelosi when Trump requested for January 6. She denied the request so what we know of January 6 to be to happen.

The democrats sensed a few outliers to do something and they didn't want the National Guard there to prevent anything so something would occur to use for political purposes. F Nancy!!

---

She is evil

I've never had a ban on this site but imagine the day she dies, assuming I'm still around and posting, I'll get one.

Sorry mom, I don't have anything nice to say but I'm going to say it anyways…

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

By Pelosi when Trump requested for January 6. She denied the request so what we know of January 6 to be to happen.

The democrats sensed a few outliers to do something and they didn't want the National Guard there to prevent anything so something would occur to use for political purposes. F Nancy!!

---

Post proof.

I wouldn't be surprised by it, but everything I can find says there's no evidence of this. Proof is required to argue beyond this thread.

I went to a bar tonight and there was a Hanoi Jane sticker in the urinal for target practice.

I hope my kids get to truly appreciate pissing on Nancy's face 50 years from now. Right next to a dozen others that deserve it too. Bunch of commie *******s.

Just like everyone wants proof the protestors were let in but oh wait FBI won't release thousands of hours of surveillance footage. Hard to show proof when big govt colludes with big tech to censor it all. Gee CNN isn't reporting it so fake news.

Waffledynamics said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

By Pelosi when Trump requested for January 6. She denied the request so what we know of January 6 to be to happen.

The democrats sensed a few outliers to do something and they didn't want the National Guard there to prevent anything so something would occur to use for political purposes. F Nancy!!

---

Post proof.

I wouldn't be surprised by it, but everything I can find says there's no evidence of this. Proof is required to argue beyond this thread.

---

Trump said tonight on Hannity when he was asked point blank tonight

The fake fact checkers say Trump did not order the National Guard but why couldn't Pelosi do it herself ?she didn't need trumps request

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

waco_aggie05 said:

---

Just like everyone wants proof the protestors were let in but oh wait FBI won't release thousands of hours of surveillance footage. Hard to show proof when big govt colludes with big tech to censor it all. Gee CNN isn't reporting it so fake news.

---

We have footage of them being let in.

https://odysee.com/@markcollettclips:3/police-let-protestors-in-capitol-hill:6

https://odysee.com/@SovereignNews:2/Capitol-Police-Open-Doors-For-Protesters

The above are just a couple of links.

We have no evidence, written or verbal recording at the time, of Trump's claim that Pelosi rejected the National Guard.

I voted for Trump and think he was absolutely wronged. He should be the President right now. I hate Pelosi with serious and heavy conviction. However, I cannot go to someone who hates Trump and hates the GOP and show them absolutely no proof of Trump's claim. They will not be swayed. There is no evidence to slap them in the face with.

Give me proof or stop making the claim. It's useless without proof.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

---

They don't have to. He can post it on any site he wants. He doesn't do it. Therefore, it's his word against their word.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

---

You saying Hannity or OAN are part of the conspiracy hating Trump? He could've brought documentation and showed it on Fox.

It's weak sauce to make claims at this point without verification.

agz win said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

---

You saying Hannity or OAN are part of the conspiracy hating Trump? He could've brought documentation and showed it on Fox.

It's weak sauce to make claims at this point without verification.

---

Agreed. You have to slap people in the face with proof to make any progress, and that's if you're lucky enough to find someone who won't immediately shut down and reject literal objective facts. Trump's word means nothing to people who already hate him.

waco_aggie05 said:

---

Just like everyone wants proof the protestors were let in but oh wait FBI won't release thousands of hours of surveillance footage. Hard to show proof when big govt colludes with big tech to censor it all. Gee CNN isn't reporting it so fake news.

---

Just like the Demoncrats used the medial and 'all 13 intelligence agencies' to promote false Russia Russia Russia claims, they used provocateurs to create their 'insurrection'.

Go back and re-read this forum in the lead up to Jan 6th and posters here we're predicting what we now know to have happened.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

The fake fact checkers say Trump did not order the National Guard but why couldn't Pelosi do it herself ?she didn't need trumps request

---

Not following you here. How does speaker of the house order the national guard to do anything?

Nancy Pelosi is in charge of the Capitol Police who let the protestors in

They wanted this to happen for exactly this sort of narrative

Quote:

---

By Pelosi when Trump requested for January 6. She denied the request so what we know of January 6 to be to happen.

---

Speaker of the house > US President and leader of the free world?
Link?

Waffledynamics said:

---

agz win said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

---

You saying Hannity or OAN are part of the conspiracy hating Trump? He could've brought documentation and showed it on Fox.

It's weak sauce to make claims at this point without verification.

---

Agreed. You have to slap people in the face with proof to make any progress, and that's if you're lucky enough to find someone who won't immediately shut down and reject literal objective facts. Trump's word means nothing to people who already hate him.

---

Do you honestly believe any amount of proof makes a difference to liberals? Yes to a logic driven conservative maybe but if your looking to change the hearts and minds of libs with proof you haven't been paying attention.

I'm afraid you speak the truth. Liberals voted for Biden in spite of proof he is a liar, a racist, a plagiarist, making millions from foreign governments, and suffering dementia

I just have to roll my eyes when I see all this " show proof or shut up stuff".... there has been shown and continue to be shown abundant proof that the election was fraudulent and more than likely stolen with proof all over the place, affidavits etc... video tape on and on... and it is completely ignored by the MSM and those that have the power to keep it out of the minds of the sheep in our country.

So when Trump says he ordered the National Guard and it was ignored by Pelosi even if he did have this written or recorded proof it would be crushed as usual. Its disgusting... I believe Trump in this case.

M-K-TAG said:

---

I just have to roll my eyes when I see all this " show proof or shut up stuff".... there has been shown and continue to be shown abundant proof that the election was fraudulent and more than likely stolen with proof all over the place, affidavits etc... video tape on and on... and it is completely ignored by the MSM and those that have the power to keep it out of the minds of the sheep in our country.

So when Trump says he ordered the National Guard and it was ignored by Pelosi even if he did have this written or recorded proof it would be crushed as usual. Its disgusting... I believe Trump in this case.

---

You can roll your eyes, but keep in mind, this discussion doesnt matter for you. You dont need to be convinced.

But there are many people who do need to be convinced, and if they were shown proof, it would destroy any credibility that Nancy and her ilk have with voters. It would be a nail in the coffin for them using this to their advantage.

If it exists, it absolutely needs to be shown so it goes from a rumor, to reality.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Nancy Pelosi is in charge of the Capitol Police who let the protestors in

They wanted this to happen for exactly this sort of narrative

---

No she's not.

The Capitol Police force is overseen by the Capitol Police Board. Several congressional committees also oversee the agency, including the House and Senate appropriations committees, the House administration committee and the Senate rules committee.

The Capitol Police Board is made up of the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms, as well as the Capitol architect. The Capitol Police chief serves in a non-voting capacity on the board.
Pelosi was not a chair or administrator of any committee supervising the Capitol Police on January 6. She's not listed on any of those committees' websites today, either.

Pelosi can appoint House members to committees, some of which have a hand in overseeing the Capitol Police. However, Mitch McConnell has the same power in the Senate.

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Do you really think the media and the Dems would honor it? The don't want the truth to be known

---

I think Americans deserve to see the proof and know the truth. So, if Trump has proof then its time to shat or get off the pot.

NTAS said:

---

I went to a bar tonight and there was a Hanoi Jane sticker in the urinal for target practice.

I hope my kids get to truly appreciate pissing on Nancy's face 50 years from now. Right next to a dozen others that deserve it too. Bunch of commie *******s.

---

Where is this? If in the greater Houston area, I'll travel up to an hour just to do this and have a few beers.

ttha_aggie_09 said:

---

I've never had a ban on this site but imagine the day she dies, assuming I'm still around and posting, I'll get one.

Sorry mom, I don't have anything nice to say but I'm going to say it anyways…

---

We should have a "mass ban" event on Texags on that day!

I know it's not the proof people are looking for, but there is the fact that the National Guard was not deployed.

Hold up! LegalKempPusher thinks Pelosi can stop a president from deploying the National Guard? Oh that's a good one!

Im Gipper said:

---

Hold up! LegalKempPusher thinks Pelosi can stop a president from deploying the National Guard? Oh that's a good one!

---

Swing and a miss.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2021/01/07/this-is-why-the-national-guard-didnt-respond-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/

Quote:

---

Simply put, the National Guard only shows up to D.C. when they've been invited, and the Capitol Police did not extend that invitation until after the breach, according to a source with knowledge of the process, who was not authorized to speak about it on the record. ...

Because of D.C.'s finicky federal status, any entity whether its the mayor, or the Interior Department, which controls federal parks within the District has to put in a request for National Guard troops through the Army secretary, who gets it endorsed by the defense secretary.

The Capitol's request for Guard back-up went beyond what Bowser had already gotten approved, so it needed a new sign-off.

---

Where in that quote does it say Nancy can stop the President from sending the National Guard as claimed by OP?


Odd how not a single person in the Dept. of Defense has come out to support Trump's claim. Wonder why that is? Must all be DEEP STATE.

If Trump wanted them there, they would have been there. That Nancy didn't care (and why would she care, she doesn't care about America) is a different issue than the after the fact lie Trump has concocted and the usual suspects believe.

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Why doesn't Pelosi say he didn't since she would know? Her silence indicates he must have

suggested NG to her!

He said he did! It's up to her now. If she says he didn't, then he will produce a tape and prove she is

the liar! If she says nothing, that is proof he wanted to send in the NG!

C@LAg said:

---

BigJim49 AustinNowDallas said:

---

agz win said:

---

Why doesn't he provide documented proof to back up his allegation? It would be a slam dunk if he did.

---

Why doesn't Pelosi say he didn't since she would know? Her silence indicates he must have

suggested NG to her!

---

as despicable as she is, it is not her place to prove him wrong.

His office would have a record of EVERY phone call, email or communication for that day.

Why has that simple bit of information not been provided yet. That is something team Trump could provide if it existed, and does not require any one else to provide.

---

Trump said he did. That's the proof. Nobody has refuted it.

That's not hearsay. You don't even know what hearsay is.