Rand Paul vs Fauci

4,252 Views | 43 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by LSB_2002
DripAG08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul just ripping into Fauci this morning! Great stuff.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I sure hope to see Fauci back up next year with a Republican controlled Senate and Paul getting to question him again.

This guy actually instead needs to be on trial! Criminal trial not a Senate hearing.

He's killed more people than any serial killer in the history of the country.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fauci accusing Paul of constant personal attacks and not answering questions
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGHouston11 said:

I sure hope to see Fauci back up next year with a Republican controlled Senate and Paul getting to question him again.

This guy actually instead needs to be on trial! Criminal trial not a Senate hearing.

He's killed more people than any serial killer in the history of the country.

No...Rachel Carson wins that one going away.
FtBendTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and here comes this feminine dem from Connecticut praising him and apologizing.

wow what a complete d bag
Jason C.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Fauci is in that typical position of would have retired by now but he can't leave or he knows he'll be the scapegoat for everything. Has to stay on to stay out of hot water.
Cen-Tex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sen Paul should've screamed "I reclaim my time", like SJL does at her hearings.
Old Sarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fraudchi: "They arrested a man in IOWA that said he was coming to kill me, and he had an AR-15!..."

This, coming from a man who helped the Chinese Communist Party in the development of a bio-weapon, who at the very least facilitated the spread, making Fraudchi at least partially (at a minimum) responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS worldwide.

Dr. Fraudchi, your weaponized virus is much more deadly than one guy with an AR-15, you piece of garbage.





Edit: Spelling
"Green" is the new RED.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ87 said:

Fauci accusing Paul of constant personal attacks and not answering questions

WTF? Paul isn't there answer Fauci's questions. This guy needs to be reminded about who he works for. Hint, it's not the CCP.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Fraudchi: "They arrested a man in IOWA that said he was coming to kill me, and he had an AR-15!..."

Fresh off of his plot to kidnap the Governor of Michigan!
Kashchei
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's biggest mistake was not firing that fraud. Although Xiden would probably have just brought him back.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
DripAG08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These committee meetings are ****ing garbage. Seriously who believes these idiots at the NIH and CDC anymore?

I mean you have to be a serious moron to think that the BS they're spewing is factual in any way!
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kashchei said:

Trump's biggest mistake was not firing that fraud. Although Xiden would probably have just brought him back.
There are some things I like about Trump, mostly how well things were going under him until Covid, but him not doing his due diligence on Fauci is inexcusable, and Trump is an idiot for sticking with him. Just the fact that Fauci idolized Hillary Clinton and basically wrote her love letters telling her how heroic she was for how she handled the Benghazi hearings should have been the ultimate red flag. Trump doing ANY basic research at all, would have revealed Fauci for the corrupt slimy little weasel that he is...and that doesn't even factor in his horrible track record with HIV/AIDS in the 80's.

This was VERY "bad Trump". Really hoping Trump does the right thing, steps aside, and endorses Desantis.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They played with fire and we all got burned. They were so fearful of another SARS outbreak that they engaged in high risk research to see how great the risk actually could be for humans, without considering the even greater risk that constitutes. They failed to do basic math: there is a very low risk a virus emerges from a natural source and spreads into a pandemic. There is a somewhat higher risk that if you go collect a large number of viruses that could do this, replicate them in labs and either enhance or isolate and replicate the worst of them to see how virulent they can get that a single containment failure could trigger the pandemic that was supposed to be prevented. If you collect the most ideal pandemic viruses and bring them to an area with a dense population and replicate them in large quantities, whether enhanced or just selected for virulence, you've created a far greater risk than the background statistical danger of doing nothing.

It was idiotic to give this research to a communist government, and it was idiotic to conduct it anywhere near an urban area.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sorry, but what good do these hearings do? Pessimism is starting to take over.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Sarge said:

Fraudchi: "They arrested a man in IOWA that said he was coming to kill me, and he had an AR-15!..."

This, coming from a man who helped the Chinese Communist Party in the development of a bio-weapon, who at the very least facilitated the spread, making Fraudchi at least partially (at a minimum) responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS worldwide.

Dr. Fraudchi, your weaponized virus is much more deadly than one guy with an AR-15, you piece of garbage.

Edit: Spelling
Dr. Fauci is deflecting. The fact someone was arrested in Iowa for threatening him is not germane. The Democratic Party leadership are masters of deflecting and derailing.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

I'm sorry, but what good do these hearings do? Pessimism is starting to take over.
I don't think I'm old enough to remember a time when they ever did any good
Showertime at the Bidens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Central Committee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Republican controlled House needs to open a formal investigation of Fauci, NIH, and CDC. Also do Hunter and Big Guy Biden over China connections. Subpoenas out the ***.

In addition to the fact that the public is owed the truth on EVERYTHING Covid, the GOP needs to use the same political weapons the dems use. Lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit. Divert their attention from their socialist agenda and drain their resources.

Finally, the Republicans need to repay the dems/communists political attacks, and kick Swallowell and Omar off their committees for violations of the espionage act and for antiemetic hate speech, respectively.

It is time for the Republicans to be just as ruthless as the dems/communists have been.
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Central Committee said:

The Republican controlled House needs to open a formal investigation of Fauci, NIH, and CDC. Also do Hunter and Big Guy Biden over China connections. Subpoenas out the ***.

In addition to the fact that the public is owed the truth on EVERYTHING Covid, the GOP needs to use the same political weapons the dems use. Lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit. Divert their attention from their socialist agenda and drain their resources.

Finally, the Republicans need to repay the dems/communists political attacks, and kick Swallowell and Omar off their committees for violations of the espionage act and for antiemetic hate speech, respectively.

It is time for the Republicans to be just as ruthless as the dems/communists have been.
They did last time against Holder the former AG, held him in contempt, he didn't care
Boo Weekley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

Old Sarge said:

Fraudchi: "They arrested a man in IOWA that said he was coming to kill me, and he had an AR-15!..."

This, coming from a man who helped the Chinese Communist Party in the development of a bio-weapon, who at the very least facilitated the spread, making Fraudchi at least partially (at a minimum) responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS worldwide.

Dr. Fraudchi, your weaponized virus is much more deadly than one guy with an AR-15, you piece of garbage.

Edit: Spelling
Dr. Fauci is deflecting. The fact someone was arrested in Iowa for threatening him is not germane. The Democratic Party leadership are masters of deflecting and derailing.
They are diabolical masters at weaponizing peoples' compassion/empathy/emotional responses/desire to feel noble and virtuous etc. against themselves and society at large. It's a deflection technique for sure and the fuel that helps them push their agenda and policies through. They know that people want to feel noble and virtuous, but that they are generally lazy, so the easiest way for many of them to do that is to just check certain boxes at the voting booth.

"The world's going to end if we don't do this!"

"My grandmother had to sell her sweaters and canned goods to pay her hospital bill and spent the winter freezing and malnourished so we need to xxx!"

"If we care at all about children, we need to do xxx!"

"Republicans want to go back to Jim Crow era laws and we know you don't want that, so we must do xxx!"

Could go on and on and on. These godless, baby murdering cretins are evil.
LostInLA07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fauci should've been kept in the background as one opinion on a committee as opposed to being the de facto Covid czar. I'm sure he's a decent scientist with a every narrow field of vision. He's awful as a public facing spokesperson and he's also an awful policymaker. Not sure how NIAID ended up making policy in the first place.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rand Paul started off about how Fauci claims he represents science itself and should not be criticized. Fauci had his prop ready, and obviously they hate each other, but it really triggered his little worthless ass today.

"Create a quick and devastating takedown of epidemiologists from Harvord, Oxford, and Stanford."



Fauci has nothing to do now, much as our own coronabro's, but demagogue and claim his opponents are just mischaracterizing and taking comments out of context.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How dare Paul impugn the dignity of St. Fauci??? Paul would know what it's like to get death threats and actually be assaulted. Poor Dr. Fauci won't answer any questions and just deflect with "Rand Paul is mean to me."
BertMacklinFBI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They played with fire and we all got burned. They were so fearful of another SARS outbreak that they engaged in high risk research to see how great the risk actually could be for humans, without considering the even greater risk that constitutes. They failed to do basic math: there is a very low risk a virus emerges from a natural source and spreads into a pandemic. There is a somewhat higher risk that if you go collect a large number of viruses that could do this, replicate them in labs and either enhance or isolate and replicate the worst of them to see how virulent they can get that a single containment failure could trigger the pandemic that was supposed to be prevented. If you collect the most ideal pandemic viruses and bring them to an area with a dense population and replicate them in large quantities, whether enhanced or just selected for virulence, you've created a far greater risk than the background statistical danger of doing nothing.

It was idiotic to give this research to a communist government, and it was idiotic to conduct it anywhere near an urban area.


I regret that I only have 1 star to give! Bravo!
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They played with fire and we all got burned. They were so fearful of another SARS outbreak that they engaged in high risk research to see how great the risk actually could be for humans, without considering the even greater risk that constitutes. They failed to do basic math: there is a very low risk a virus emerges from a natural source and spreads into a pandemic. There is a somewhat higher risk that if you go collect a large number of viruses that could do this, replicate them in labs and either enhance or isolate and replicate the worst of them to see how virulent they can get that a single containment failure could trigger the pandemic that was supposed to be prevented. If you collect the most ideal pandemic viruses and bring them to an area with a dense population and replicate them in large quantities, whether enhanced or just selected for virulence, you've created a far greater risk than the background statistical danger of doing nothing.

It was idiotic to give this research to a communist government, and it was idiotic to conduct it anywhere near an urban area.
I agree completely and this is a good post. I will add that it was idiotic at best but I also have no doubt there were those questioning how it could be used to control a population. The history of our government leaders the last couple of decades leads me to believe this was done for more than just the fear of another SARS outbreak.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They played with fire and we all got burned. They were so fearful of another SARS outbreak that they engaged in high risk research to see how great the risk actually could be for humans, without considering the even greater risk that constitutes. They failed to do basic math: there is a very low risk a virus emerges from a natural source and spreads into a pandemic. There is a somewhat higher risk that if you go collect a large number of viruses that could do this, replicate them in labs and either enhance or isolate and replicate the worst of them to see how virulent they can get that a single containment failure could trigger the pandemic that was supposed to be prevented. If you collect the most ideal pandemic viruses and bring them to an area with a dense population and replicate them in large quantities, whether enhanced or just selected for virulence, you've created a far greater risk than the background statistical danger of doing nothing.

It was idiotic to give this research to a communist government, and it was idiotic to conduct it anywhere near an urban area.
Correction; it was not just idiotic (and immoral), it was also illegal, as the DoD found, but Fauci ignored that because he wanted to funnel to EcoHealth/WIV.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Womackster said:

nortex97 said:

Rand Paul started off about how Fauci claims he represents science itself and should not be criticized. Fauci had his prop ready, and obviously they hate each other, but it really triggered his little worthless ass today.

"Create a quick and devastating takedown of epidemiologists from Harvord, Oxford, and Stanford."



Fauci has nothing to do now, much as our own coronabro's, but demagogue and claim his opponents are just mischaracterizing and taking comments out of context.

Too bad the police stopped that guy.
Are you stating you wish Paul was murdered by a Democrat terrorist?
I think we would like to know where you're coming from. Please reference posts where you expressed incredulity or outrage that Fauci has continued gain of function research in China after it was outlawed in the US resulting in the deaths of millions of people, crashed economies, lifelong ailments, and draconian measures taken against people world wide.
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LEO: "Sir may I see your driver's license and could you tell me where you are going?"

Fauci hater: "Sure, I'm going to Washington DC to kill Fauci."

I'm pretty sure that is how it happened
Womackster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Womackster said:

nortex97 said:

Rand Paul started off about how Fauci claims he represents science itself and should not be criticized. Fauci had his prop ready, and obviously they hate each other, but it really triggered his little worthless ass today.

"Create a quick and devastating takedown of epidemiologists from Harvord, Oxford, and Stanford."



Fauci has nothing to do now, much as our own coronabro's, but demagogue and claim his opponents are just mischaracterizing and taking comments out of context.

Too bad the police stopped that guy.
Are you stating you wish Paul was murdered by a Democrat terrorist?

nvm
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you read the document from Veritas, it says that SARS-CoV-2 was created as a vaccine for bats. They wanted to stop the next outbreak by aerosolizing that vaccine to the bats in the caves of China. Too bad it escaped the lab and was harmful to humans. It further goes on to state that the MRNA vaccines will exacerbate the problem and potentially make the outbreak worse. Shocking stuff, if true
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Womackster said:

Proc92 said:

Womackster said:

nortex97 said:

Rand Paul started off about how Fauci claims he represents science itself and should not be criticized. Fauci had his prop ready, and obviously they hate each other, but it really triggered his little worthless ass today.

"Create a quick and devastating takedown of epidemiologists from Harvord, Oxford, and Stanford."



Fauci has nothing to do now, much as our own coronabro's, but demagogue and claim his opponents are just mischaracterizing and taking comments out of context.

Too bad the police stopped that guy.
Are you stating you wish Paul was murdered by a Democrat terrorist?

nvm
Yeah,

This is kind of like saying "I hope your kid gets killed by a drunk driver"

This needs more context. As it stands, it doesn't look good.
Matt_ag98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

They played with fire and we all got burned. They were so fearful of another SARS outbreak that they engaged in high risk research to see how great the risk actually could be for humans, without considering the even greater risk that constitutes. They failed to do basic math: there is a very low risk a virus emerges from a natural source and spreads into a pandemic. There is a somewhat higher risk that if you go collect a large number of viruses that could do this, replicate them in labs and either enhance or isolate and replicate the worst of them to see how virulent they can get that a single containment failure could trigger the pandemic that was supposed to be prevented. If you collect the most ideal pandemic viruses and bring them to an area with a dense population and replicate them in large quantities, whether enhanced or just selected for virulence, you've created a far greater risk than the background statistical danger of doing nothing.

It was idiotic to give this research to a communist government, and it was idiotic to conduct it anywhere near an urban area.


"Especially one with some many wet-markets....right?"...or is the MSM finally dropping that lie
Womackster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

Womackster said:

Proc92 said:

Womackster said:

nortex97 said:

Rand Paul started off about how Fauci claims he represents science itself and should not be criticized. Fauci had his prop ready, and obviously they hate each other, but it really triggered his little worthless ass today.

"Create a quick and devastating takedown of epidemiologists from Harvord, Oxford, and Stanford."



Fauci has nothing to do now, much as our own coronabro's, but demagogue and claim his opponents are just mischaracterizing and taking comments out of context.

Too bad the police stopped that guy.
Are you stating you wish Paul was murdered by a Democrat terrorist?

nvm
Yeah,

This is kind of like saying "I hope your kid gets killed by a drunk driver"

This needs more context. As it stands, it doesn't look good.

Have to be careful so as not to catch a ban. There is a man who should be tried for treason for his part in an atrocity which affected the whole world. Out of his forked tongue he claims that there was an incident in which an uninvited guest was stopped in route to see him and that that guest was inspired by the criticism a public official had rightly directed at him. I intimated that perhaps history would not have judged too harshly the uninvited guest had his visit been fulfilled.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.