***** OFFICIAL Russia v. Ukraine *****

1,112,811 Views | 10330 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by TRM
TomFoolery
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Robk said:

ATX_AG_08 said:


Like everything else in this war, I do not think this is going to go russia's way.


Okay but how many Stanley nickels
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

People keep forgetting that everyone thought that this was a bluff until the last minute, even Ukraine was surprised.


The damned Russians could not have telegraphed their intentions any more loudly than they did. The only way this wasn't happening was if a preemptive capitulation by the Ukrainians had occurred. I believe many governments saw it this way.

My $.02 vis--vis the Ukrainian lack of preparation is that they did as little as they thought they could get away with without provoking an earlier response the Bolsheviks- but they knew, too.
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

12th Man said:

I can't quite see it your way, but I understand it.

In hindsight, I think the best move would've been to be in Ukraine in force before the invasion could've started. I don't think the Russians would've invaded had there been 5000 or so American military there embedded with the Ukrainians. If these sanctions outrage the Russians instead of deterring them, we may end up with far more people in harms way than what we could've gotten away with in January. This is just a guess, though.

Nobody knows, and I hope you're right.
Stationing our troops in the west wouldn't have prevented the Russians from entering Donbas and if we stationed troops in the east, Russia would have just sent his little green men to turn up the heat on the existing civil war.

Trump threatened Moscow if Putin entered Ukraine. Those credible threats would have prevented things from ever starting. Instead our president talked about varied economic responses if there was a minor excursion.


This administration failed in both preparation and response. I'm not talking about the Donbas and/or Crimea- I'm talking status quo ante bellum.

I DO think positioning appreciable numbers of Americans in unoccupied Ukraine would've given pause to Russian planners -especially had we deployed aviation and anti-air assets. Now, you could dress Putin in a leather teddy and he'd still have more balls than Lyndon Johnson ever did, but I'm not talking about the relatively small number of Soviet/Chinese advisors that deterred LBJ from un-muzzling our Naval & Air Force action over North Vietnam; I mean 5k combat troops embedded to "train up the Ukrainians". My $.02 is that that would've been an effective deterrent.

It also would've been a far more lucrative plan to NOT green-light the damned Russians as Anvil Joe did when he stammered out that we would not go in to protect Ukraine. Stoopid.

All this discussion is better reserved for the post mortem hot wash, and I apologize for the derail. Aw hell, maybe we're just giving hope that there will still be something for us to all talk about in the Ukraine/Russia off-season
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man said:

BusterAg said:

People keep forgetting that everyone thought that this was a bluff until the last minute, even Ukraine was surprised.


The damned Russians could not have telegraphed their intentions any more loudly than they did. The only way this wasn't happening was if a preemptive capitulation by the Ukrainians had occurred. I believe many governments saw it this way.

My $.02 vis--vis the Ukrainian lack of preparation is that they did as little as they thought they could get away with without provoking an earlier response the Bolsheviks- but they knew, too.
That's all Monday morning QBing.

I think it is an untenable position to say that we all should have known that Putin was going to invade. Lots of people thought he was too smart to try something so stupid.

These links will demonstrate that, while there was definitely a lot of worry and questions about whether he would or not, most people thought it was sabre rattling.


https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/why-putin-wont-invade-ukraine/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60468264

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/2/9/no-russia-will-not-invade-ukraine

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2021/12/06/quick-take-why-putin-wont-invade-ukraine/?sh=57f7ae0a2927

https://www.usnews.com/news/world-report/articles/2021-11-23/putin-spokesman-russia-wont-invade-ukraine-unless-its-provoked

https://www.vox.com/2022/2/21/22944995/russia-vladimir-putin-orders-troops-ukraine-east-donbas

https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/12/putin-does-not-need-invade-ukraine-get-his-way

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-17/russia-tells-u-s-no-ukraine-invasion-planned-tass-says

https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/12/27/how-russia-decides-when-to-invade/

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/02/19/whether-he-invades-ukraine-or-backs-down-putin-has-harmed-russia

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/blinken-dares-putin-to-tell-the-world-russia-will-not-invade-ukraine-20220218-p59xim.html

https://www.understandingwar.org/report/putins-likely-courses-action-ukraine-part-2
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's a lot of journalistic wishful thinking. I think Gell-Mann applies here, especially considering the current administrations position that nothing would have stopped putin from invading.
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh... so you're not "Monday morning quarterbacking", here? Gotcha.

Yes, nobody ever knows what's going to happen, but we have precedent, personalities and patterns to which we can look for clues. Neither you nor I will likely ever know which countries foresaw the invasion as imminent, but it's entirely correct that the Russians could not have telegraphed their intentions any more clearly.
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12th Man said:

Rossticus said:




One wonders how many more of these ever-escalating sanctions the Russians will endure before a cornered Putin strikes back: they remind me of FDR's sanctioning of the Japanese. I think we all know that sanctions don't deter anybody, they merely piss off the recipient.

Considering the Nazis were at war with Britain and Britain still honored Germany's bonds and contracts is telling. The US is petulant and is defaulting.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:




The Soviet occupation of ELL was brutal.
Demosthenes81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Seven and three are ten, not only now, but forever. There has never been a time when seven and three were not ten, nor will there ever be a time when they are not ten. Therefore, I have said that the truth of number is incorruptible and common to all who think. — St. Augustine
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's exceptional.
Post removed:
by user
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reason #763 why Putin doesn't want to FAAFO.



B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:

Reason #763 why Putin doesn't want to FAAFO.




My dad passed away at age 97 in September. He was flying them over 60 years ago before I was born. A great stand-off missile platform, and still can pack a punch as a conventional bomber.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Pianist vibes.

Robk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In relation to the post above
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Putin is damaged goods, he has blundered and exposed his country.

How will they suicidal him?

My guess is thrown out of a door of a helo.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vurt der ferk?

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Their "advanced" stuff is just smoke and mirrors. Next gen tank, but they can't produce it. Su-57? They have four.
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Hillary's Russian campaign hoax is still going strong.
First Page Last Page
Page 252 of 296
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.