Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

CanyonAg77 said:

---

PJYoung said:

---

CanyonAg77 said:

---

45-70Ag said:

---

*CHICAGO CORN FUTURES RISE BY EXCHANGE LIMIT $35 TO $690.75/BU

— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) February 28, 2022

---

Almost $700 a bushel?

That's quite an increase from the normal $4 to $5 a bushel.

If you haven't bought your deer corn yet, sucks to be you. Your 50 pound bag is now going to cost you $617.00

Or maybe city boy doesn't have a clue, and misplaced the decimal point.

---

Quote:

---

Contract Size 5,000 bushels (~ 127 Metric Tons)

---

---

5,000 bushels would be $25,000 in normal times, not less than $700

This is 100% a guy who either doesn't know how future are priced (most likely) or forgot the decimal.

A bushel of corn is 56 pounds. This guy is saying $690 a bushel or $12 a pound

You're trying to say it for 5,000 bushels, which would be 2/10 of a cent per pound

You're both wrong.

---

I was just telling you what the contract size is.

https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/grains/corn.contractSpecs.html

MINIMUM PRICE FLUCTUATION
1/4 of one cent (0.0025) per bushel = $12.50
TAS: Zero or +/- 4 ticks in the minimum tick increment of the outright

Quote:

---

I was just telling you what the contract size is.

---

Okay, thanks for explaining to a farmer who has followed grain prices for 50 years.

The discussion was the price. He's wrong on price per bushel, so when you told me the contract size, as a response to my saying he's full of crap, my only logical deduction was that you were telling me that he was pricing a whole contract, not a single bushel.

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

A Ukrainian TB2 drone struck a Russian fuel train significantly behind the front lines. https://t.co/g1TKjRAKCT

— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) February 28, 2022

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Quote:

---

I was just telling you what the contract size is.

---

Okay, thanks for explaining to a farmer who has followed grain prices for 50 years.

The discussion was the price. He's wrong on price per bushel, so when you told me the contract size, as a response to my saying he's full of crap, my only logical deduction was that you were telling me that he was pricing a whole contract, not a single bushel.

---

Gotcha.

Europe's got more recoverable shale gas than the U.S., according to estimates, yet there's been little exploration. Germany, France, the Netherlands, Scotland and Bulgaria all effectively ban fracking.

That could change fast and soon...

45-70Ag said:

---

NASDAQ AND NYSE HAVE TEMPORARILY HALTED STOCKS OF RUSSIA-BASED COMPANIES LISTED ON THEIR EXCHANGES - EXCHANGE WEBSITES

NYSE AND NASDAQ TEMPORARY HALTS OF RUSSIA-BASED COMPANIES LISTED ON THEIR EXCHANGES DUE TO REGULATORY CONCERNS FOLLOWING SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA - SOURCES

— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) February 28, 2022

---

It's like nothing was learned from Luckin Coffee (China). In today's modern world any person individually and any company can send international wires with ease.

There is no reason for Chinese, Russian, Mexican, Canadian, German etc. companies to be listed on U.S based exchanges. There really should be an international agreement that companies stock can only be listed on the exchanges of their corporate HQ / domiciled country.

If a person wants to invest in a foreign company, they can do so with an international stock purchase, if they want to trade in the stock of a foreign company, they can do so via an international stock trade.

Why not just go ahead and list known Ponzi schemes on the U.S. exchanges as well?

I was going to add, that I've seen and read other explainer threads out there about the Russian military failure. I differ with some of those explanations, they're generally not coming from Russia mil experts, and 4 days into a war might be a bit early for conclusive statements.

— Michael Kofman (@KofmanMichael) February 28, 2022

Ways to Defend a City like #Kiev #Ukraine A few tactics that have worked in many many city battles of the past by me and my partner @JaysonGeroux https://t.co/CqJa5zNIlh

— John Spencer (@SpencerGuard) February 28, 2022

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Anyway, don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen tells @euronews the EU wants Ukraine in the bloc:

"They belong to us, they are one of us, and we want them in." pic.twitter.com/DX7VcYgJDc

— The Recount (@therecount) February 28, 2022

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

---

FERC has approved zero projects since the commission flipped to D control last summer. They also recently made a policy change that makes it much harder to get pipelines approved. Hopefully the Ukraine crisis causes.a rethink.

Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine hasn't delayed my project, the Feds have. I know perfectly well of each of those projects but thanks for reminding me of where the BD dollars went over the last few years.

wessimo said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

---

FERC has approved zero projects since the commission flipped to D control last summer. They also recently made a policy change that makes it much harder to get pipelines approved. Hopefully the Ukraine crisis causes.a rethink.

---

That's because there are 14 major LNG expansion projects already approved and awaiting construction and only four more pending application. There's only so much expansion the industry can absorb at one time. TERMINALS

I'm seeing another side to the Ukraine response. It is showing that technology is at a point that an asymmetric response with drones can be enough to hold off a much larger enemy.

Now imagine the United States in a similar situation, only the enemy isn't the Taliban or a resource-starved Iraq.

NASA's FIRMS shows dozens of fires earlier today in Berezivka, about 20 km to the west of Kyiv. https://t.co/4ksQB3shJq pic.twitter.com/yT6WIr8m41

— Brady Africk (@bradyafr) February 28, 2022

Build It said:

---

Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine hasn't delayed my project, the Feds have. I know perfectly well of each of those projects but thanks for reminding me of where the BD dollars went over the last few years.

---

You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts:

"In 2022, US LNG export capacity will exceed that of the two current largest global LNG exporters, Australia (11.4 6 billion ft3/day) and Qatar (10.3 6 billion ft3/day). By 2024, when Golden Pass LNG the eighth US LNG export facility completes construction and begins operations, US LNG peak export capacity will further increase to an estimated 16.3 6 billion ft3/day.

In addition, FERC and the US Department of Energy have approved another 10 US LNG export projects and capacity expansions at three existing LNG terminals Cameron, Freeport, and Corpus Christi totalling 25 6 billion ft3/day of new capacity. Developers of some of these projects announced plans to make a final investment decision (FID) in 2022."

74OA said:

---

wessimo said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

---

FERC has approved zero projects since the commission flipped to D control last summer. They also recently made a policy change that makes it much harder to get pipelines approved. Hopefully the Ukraine crisis causes.a rethink.

---

That's because there are 14 major LNG expansion projects already approved and awaiting construction and only four more pending application. There's only so much expansion the industry can absorb at one time. TERMINALS

---

Edit - should have read the prior posts in quote.

TRM said:

---

NASA's FIRMS shows dozens of fires earlier today in Berezivka, about 20 km to the west of Kyiv. https://t.co/4ksQB3shJq pic.twitter.com/yT6WIr8m41

— Brady Africk (@bradyafr) February 28, 2022

---

with it being winter and probably lots of dry grass in the fields and forest, you would think forest fires and grass fires are everywhere do to all the bombs and munitions going off, they probably arent fighting them either with the war going on, these will only get worse

mike0305 said:

---

74OA said:

---

wessimo said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

---

FERC has approved zero projects since the commission flipped to D control last summer. They also recently made a policy change that makes it much harder to get pipelines approved. Hopefully the Ukraine crisis causes.a rethink.

---

That's because there are 14 major LNG expansion projects already approved and awaiting construction and only four more pending application. There's only so much expansion the industry can absorb at one time. TERMINALS

---

This is for the private industry to resolve. Huge fortunes to be made, and some will lose. Let market evolution work, not the govt.

---

Yes, but private industry has to have financing in place. Excerpt from my post just above: "Developers of some of these projects announced plans to make a final investment decision (FID) in 2022."

Maybe we can send all those celebrities to help put out forest fires.

A bit of "what-if" paranoia here.

It is widely assumed that Putin has not sent his best first line troops into Ukraine yet.
A lot of reserve armaments are being sent to Ukraine by NATO countries.

What if Putin's real target is Poland and/or the Baltics.?

Just crazy thinking on a Monday afternoon.

74OA said:

---

mike0305 said:

---

74OA said:

---

wessimo said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

74OA said:

---

Build It said:

---

Yea, I know I'm building for one.

To suggest the current Admin hasn't tried to slow and stop the expansion is dishonest.

---

EXPANSION

---

you keep posting the same thing. I never suggested it had all stopped? Many if not all those expansions began plans long before Biden. They have been trying to impede further industry growth since day 1. What is your point? We all know we once were a net exporter. We grew quickly in response to world demand fot LNG. Since that time they have been working against the industry. I have a couple projects in this sector that have had a 12 month delay because of gov delays.

Again, do you have a point?

---

My point is your assertion that Biden had stopped LNG expansion is not accurate.

As the article points out, there are expansion projects planned, approved and underway for years to come and none are on hold.

Your OP that I initially replied to was about LNG expansion and we are the #2 exporter of that in the world and forecast to become #1 this year.

Don't argue with me about it--call up the Hydrocarbon Engineering Magazine writers and tell them they don't know what they're talking about.

---

FERC has approved zero projects since the commission flipped to D control last summer. They also recently made a policy change that makes it much harder to get pipelines approved. Hopefully the Ukraine crisis causes.a rethink.

---

That's because there are 14 major LNG expansion projects already approved and awaiting construction and only four more pending application. There's only so much expansion the industry can absorb at one time. TERMINALS

---

This is for the private industry to resolve. Huge fortunes to be made, and some will lose. Let market evolution work, not the govt.

---

Yes, but private industry has to have financing in place. Excerpt from my post just above: "Developers of some of these projects announced plans to make a final investment decision (FID) in 2022."

---

Yea, I followed your point once I read more of the context. I went back and re-read as I've read a lot of your posts and it didn't sit well, no way you were taking that stance w/o reason

Demosthenes81 said:

---

A bit of "what-if" paranoia here.

It is widely assumed that Putin has not sent his best first line troops into Ukraine yet.
A lot of reserve armaments are being sent to Ukraine by NATO countries.

What if Putin's real target is Poland and/or the Baltics.?

Just crazy thinking on a Monday afternoon.

---

Putin thought he was playing Prairie View A&M and started his 3rd stringers?

Bubblez said:

---

Putin thought he was playing Prairie View A&M and started his 3rd stringers?

---

Arkansas State.

Except for all those elite VdV paratroopers who got wiped out on D+1 I suppose...

Putin apologists clinging desperately to the myth of their internet meme hero. If only Russian solders showed such determination.

Demosthenes81 said:

---

A bit of "what-if" paranoia here.

It is widely assumed that Putin has not sent his best first line troops into Ukraine yet.
A lot of reserve armaments are being sent to Ukraine by NATO countries.

What if Putin's real target is Poland and/or the Baltics.?

Just crazy thinking on a Monday afternoon.

---

This is the exact plot for Red War by: Kyle Mills written ~3 years ago. Fane an attack on ukraine and then slam all 3 Baltic states. Look it up, good book.