***** OFFICIAL Russia v. Ukraine *****

1,056,959 Views | 10330 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by TRM
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
45-70Ag said:




*insert of you're really ****ed now gif*

FFL might be the craziest expeditionary force of them all.
FamousAgg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like their are 3 ways this could end based on how badly the invasion is going:
A - Putin eats a bullet
B - Russians drag Putin out into the streets
C - Putin escalates into a true WW3
D - Putin takes the L and goes home

Thoughts?
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BattleGrackle said:

Looks like their are 3 ways this could end based on how badly the invasion is going:
A - Putin eats a bullet
B - Russians drag Putin out into the streets
C - Putin escalates into a true WW3
D - Putin takes the L and goes home

Thoughts?


D or A will never happen.
The Russian people had better get to B before Putin's only option is to go all in with C.
TChaney
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Probably one of the most important videos we all missed from early in the conflict.
mickeyrig06sq3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:



One way to motivate the defenders

Hell, that's a way to motivate a Russian soldier. "800 bucks and I can leave Russia? Deuces b*tches"
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
45-70Ag said:


To be fair, the Kiev nightlife is still booming.
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mickeyrig06sq3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1872walker said:

BattleGrackle said:

Looks like their are 3 ways this could end based on how badly the invasion is going:
A - Putin eats a bullet
B - Russians drag Putin out into the streets
C - Putin escalates into a true WW3
D - Putin takes the L and goes home

Thoughts?


D or A will never happen.
The Russian people had better get to B before Putin's only option is to go all in with C.

There's also the Clinton variant of A. He had his oligarchs in line when he was the only one who would sieze their toys. Now that the rest of the world is doing the seizing...
1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mickeyrig06sq3 said:

1872walker said:

BattleGrackle said:

Looks like their are 3 ways this could end based on how badly the invasion is going:
A - Putin eats a bullet
B - Russians drag Putin out into the streets
C - Putin escalates into a true WW3
D - Putin takes the L and goes home

Thoughts?


D or A will never happen.
The Russian people had better get to B before Putin's only option is to go all in with C.

There's also the Clinton variant of A. He had his oligarchs in line when he was the only one who would sieze their toys. Now that the rest of the world is doing the seizing...


Right. I'm assuming A is the Hitler escape plan and am tossing his inner circle in with B.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B would be how Mussolini met his doom…
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


jetch17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Amazing. I would love to know what eventually happened.

45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Peace talks to be held on Belarus-Ukraine border
Seabreeze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:

Amazing. I would love to know what eventually happened.



Hopefully take them tanks and use them to ambush other Ruskie tank columns.
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nope

45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

sanangelo said:

GAC06 said:

MagnumLoad said:

I would be amazed if the US and NATO have zero tactical nuclear weapons, regardless of what they say. If so, while Russia retains tactical nukes, that would be beyond stupid.


We absolutely have tactical nukes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb
A b61 is delivered from a _strategic_ bomber called a B-52 and launched at large, pre-planned targets. Half the Buff bomb bay is designed to hold 4 of them. It is NOT a tactical nuke in the mindset of a battlefield. A tac nuke is launched from the army men at other army men, not from strategic bombers.


"It is a low to intermediate-yield strategic and tactical nuclear weapon"

" The B61 is of the variable yield ("dial-a-yield" in informal military jargon) design with a yield of 0.3 to 340 kilotons in its various mods. It is a Full Fuzing Option (FUFO) weapon meaning it is equipped with the full range of fuzing and delivery options including air and ground burst fuzing, and free-fall, ******ed free-fall and laydown delivery."

It's 715lbs so I bet a B-52 could carry a LOT more than that. Oh and:

" The B61 has been deployed by a variety of U.S. military aircraft. US aircraft cleared for its use have included the B-1 Lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 Stratofortress, F/A-18 Hornet, A-6 Intruder, F-15E Strike Eagle and F-16 Falcon. As part of NATO Nuclear Weapons Sharing British, German and Italian Panavia Tornado aircraft can also carry B61s.[3] The B61 can fit inside the F-22 Raptor's weapons bays and will also be carried by the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II."

Edit: Asterix word is "re tar ded" which is dumb to censor in this context.


I am not privy to all the secret info, but the B-61 is the main nuclear bomb in the inventory today.

I know that the "dial-a-yield", which allows it to be used as a tactical nuke, is employed on the new version, the B-61-12 (also known as the B-61 Mod 12). I don't know how many of the older bombs already have that capability.

The MOD 12 also has a "tail unit", which makes it a precision guided bomb, which also allows it to be a tactical weapon.

And for those who commented that the -61 is an old bomb, yes, it is. But part of the B-61-12 program is the LEP, Life Extension Program. For instance, assume there are electronics, conventional explosives, or other components that don't age well. They are replaced o the -12.

I also know that the first B-61-12 didn't roll off the line until about three months ago. Who knows how many are in service.

https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-completes-first-production-unit-b61-12-life-extension-program
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:




Man if this keeps up it will be the russians asking biden for an uber, and the Ukes can refresh their 7.62 out of all their mostly intact vehicles.

“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phat32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Putting nuke forces on alert publicly is a dick move.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12 said:



Peace talks to be held on Belarus-Ukraine border
TX04Aggie said:

BBC backing off the meeting happening on the border of Belarus. Saying Ukraine has not confirmed that this meeting is on.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Modern day Stubby. Currently my 6 yos fav.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:


TX_COWDOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where's Joe?
www.southpawprecision.com
Type 07 FFL / Class 2 SOT
Nightforce Optics Dealer
AGM Night Vision Dealer
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TX_COWDOC said:

Where's Joe?

This is interesting in that, at least during the Cold War, the US would have matched such a nuclear-readiness escalation with an announcement of our own…
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

TX_COWDOC said:

Where's Joe?

This is interesting in that, at least during the Cold War, the US would have matched such a nuclear-readiness escalation with an announcement of our own…
Maybe we've decided not to play Putin's game.
45-70Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm hoping we've matched it, whether or not announced is irrelevant. They can probably tell if/when we do.
brad5q
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In his basement in Delaware, eating ice cream?
Ag BQ '80
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
45-70Ag said:



Anyone know what this signals?
First Page Last Page
Page 147 of 296
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.