Nadler: "you'd use semi-automatic weapons against American Troops?"


Yes Jerry. If the government became tyrannical and the use of firearms became necessary to defend our God-given rights, the second amendment gives us the right to do that.That's what it's there for.

How does Wadler not know that?

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

How does Wadler not know that?

---

He knows. He wants a soundbite hoping to make the right look crazy for suggesting that our benevolent government might need to be confronted with guns.

Jerry is just testing the water. He know what he is asking.

Besides...the 2nd Amendment predates the modern notions and conceptions of a standing army by a good margin.

96AgGrad said:

---

Funky Winkerbean said:

---

How does Wadler not know that?

---

He knows. He wants a soundbite hoping to make the right look crazy for suggesting that our benevolent government might need to be confronted with guns.

---

Even though it says, right there in the declaration, that it is our right and duty to THROW OFF a tyrannical government. That doesn't mean "vote them out".

AggieUSMC said:

---

Nadler: "you'd use semi-automatic weapons against American Troops?"


Yes Jerry. If the government became tyrannical and the use of firearms became necessary to defend our God-given rights, the second amendment gives us the right to do that.That's what it's there for.

---

How quickly it is forgotten that troops with semi-automatic weapons stood along the capital to protect the new president FROM.THE PEOPLE during inauguration.

Now watch the propaganda arm of the totalitarians parse Congressman Roy's excellent point of clarification of the second amendment and make it sound much different.

Nadler: What do you use semi-automatic weapons for?

The level of ignorance at his position is astounding.

geoag58 said:

---

Now watch the propaganda arm of the totalitarians parse Congressman Roy's excellent point of clarification of the second amendment and make it sound much different.

---

Yep, this is exactly what will happen and what Nadler was leading Roy towards. They now have a conservative congressman openly admitting that guns should be used against government. Roy will be colored a insurrectionist and terrorist. Democrats and the media are working hard to push this narrative that conservatives are dangerous to national security.

https://news.yahoo.com/prri-poll-republicans-violence-040144322.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_03

This is exactly how the Nazis neutralized the Communists in pre-Nazi Germany. Dems are copying the Nazi playbook right down to their own Reichstag event on Jan 6.

Debate is lost when members ask for an additional 30 seconds be granted "please".

well done. Democrats have been trying to take away gun rights since the 1800's.

I think Chip's point needs to be driven home hard especially to the black community. Trump started to turn that demographic and I think there's room for growth.

Quote:

---

Yes Jerry. If the government became tyrannical and the use of firearms became necessary to defend our God-given rights, the second amendment gives us the right to do that.That's what it's there for.

---

Deez be yo people Jerry.

HumpitPuryear said:

---

geoag58 said:

---

Now watch the propaganda arm of the totalitarians parse Congressman Roy's excellent point of clarification of the second amendment and make it sound much different.

---

Yep, this is exactly what will happen and what Nadler was leading Roy towards. They now have a conservative congressman openly admitting that guns should be used against government. Roy will be colored a insurrectionist and terrorist. Democrats and the media are working hard to push this narrative that conservatives are dangerous to national security.

https://news.yahoo.com/prri-poll-republicans-violence-040144322.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_03

This is exactly how the Nazis neutralized the Communists in pre-Nazi Germany. Dems are copying the Nazi playbook right down to their own Reichstag event on Jan 6.

---

We are and that's the entire design of the nation. They're trying to equate the nation and it's government as if they're one in the same so that the nave believe that fighting back against government tyranny is effectively fighting back against the nation itself. And if the naive among my family are any indication it's working swimmingly well.

LOYAL AG said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

geoag58 said:

---

Now watch the propaganda arm of the totalitarians parse Congressman Roy's excellent point of clarification of the second amendment and make it sound much different.

---

Yep, this is exactly what will happen and what Nadler was leading Roy towards. They now have a conservative congressman openly admitting that guns should be used against government. Roy will be colored a insurrectionist and terrorist. Democrats and the media are working hard to push this narrative that conservatives are dangerous to national security.

https://news.yahoo.com/prri-poll-republicans-violence-040144322.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_03

This is exactly how the Nazis neutralized the Communists in pre-Nazi Germany. Dems are copying the Nazi playbook right down to their own Reichstag event on Jan 6.

---

We are and that's the entire design of the nation. They're trying to equate the nation and it's government as if they're one in the same so that the nave believe that fighting back against government tyranny is effectively fighting back against the nation itself. And if the naive among my family are any indication it's working swimmingly well.

---

Agree. That's a good distinction between "government" and "nation".

Emotional Support Cobra said:

---

AggieUSMC said:

---

Nadler: "you'd use semi-automatic weapons against American Troops?"


Yes Jerry. If the government became tyrannical and the use of firearms became necessary to defend our God-given rights, the second amendment gives us the right to do that.That's what it's there for.

---

How quickly it is forgotten that troops with semi-automatic weapons stood along the capital to protect the new president FROM.THE PEOPLE during inauguration.

---

Exactly what I was thinking.

Chairman Nadler
1. Do highly-trained professionals paid for by US citizens, protect you in your daily life?
1. What type of firearms do they use to protect you and why shouldn't they use a single shot .410?
2. Should you (the gov't) be able to decide how much protection the common man is able to possess?

Have any R's ever asked them point-blank the above?

Chip is super smart and surprisingly conservative and principled. I worked with him 20 years ago while he was in school. He ran our statewide political campaign's IT infrastructure. Then he went on to get his law degree i think from Virginia while working for Cornyn as an aid.

He ain't no Cornyn disciple.

How many people can equally run an IT dept and also get a law degree.